You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Wangda Tan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/01/20 08:54:39 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (YARN-4606) CapacityScheduler: applications could get starved because computation of #activeUsers considers pending apps

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Wangda Tan updated YARN-4606:
-----------------------------
    Summary: CapacityScheduler: applications could get starved because computation of #activeUsers considers pending apps   (was: CapacityScheduler: applications could get starved because #activeUsers considers pending apps)

> CapacityScheduler: applications could get starved because computation of #activeUsers considers pending apps 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4606
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4606
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: capacity scheduler, capacityscheduler
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0, 2.7.1
>            Reporter: Karam Singh
>            Assignee: Wangda Tan
>
> Currently, if all applications belong to same user in LeafQueue are pending (caused by max-am-percent, etc.), ActiveUsersManager still considers the user is an active user. This could lead to starvation of active applications, for example:
> - App1(belongs to user1)/app2(belongs to user2) are active, app3(belongs to user3)/app4(belongs to user4) are pending
> - ActiveUsersManager returns #active-users=4
> - However, there're only two users (user1/user2) are able to allocate new resources. So computed user-limit-resource could be lower than expected.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)