You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@logging.apache.org by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> on 2022/07/28 14:51:26 UTC
log4net 2.0.15 vote
I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until Saturday.
Ralph
> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>
> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>
> -Robert Middleton
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>
>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>
>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>>
>> Thanks
>> -d
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Posted by Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi all
Thanks for the votes, 2.0.15 is now live.
-d
On Aug 4 2022, at 5:14 am, Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ralph
> Yes, I'll release as soon as I get a gap. I replied to the signing request too - not sure what happened to 2.0.14, but every other release is signed. The signing attribute was missing - I must have accidentally deleted it - I've added a test to check that it's in place and checked that the RC artifact assemblies are signed (that's the mystery: they are signed, even though I just added the signing attribute back 🤔. Oh well, now there's a test for it and tests are run as part of the release artifact generation, so if it happens again, at least I'll know).
> -e
>
> On 03 August 2022 22:00:34 Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> > Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as release manager you will be voting +1.
> > However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do that before you send it there.
> > Ralph
> > > On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Same here. I can review over the weekend.
> > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until Saturday.
> > > > Ralph
> > > > > On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org (http://downloads.apache.org) until actually
> > > > > released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
> > > > > course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
> > > > > are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Robert Middleton
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
> > > > > <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all
> > > > > > It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
> > > > > > I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
> > > > > > I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
> > > > > > @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > -d
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Posted by Davyd McColl <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ralph
Yes, I'll release as soon as I get a gap. I replied to the signing request
too - not sure what happened to 2.0.14, but every other release is signed.
The signing attribute was missing - I must have accidentally deleted it -
I've added a test to check that it's in place and checked that the RC
artifact assemblies are signed (that's the mystery: they are signed, even
though I just added the signing attribute back 🤔. Oh well, now there's a
test for it and tests are run as part of the release artifact generation,
so if it happens again, at least I'll know).
-e
On 03 August 2022 22:00:34 Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as
> release manager you will be voting +1.
>
> However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do
> that before you send it there.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Same here. I can review over the weekend.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until
>>> Saturday.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
>>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
>>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>>>>
>>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
>>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>>>>
>>>> -Robert Middleton
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
>>>> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>
>>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15
>>>>> release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at
>>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>>>>
>>>>> This is probably why download links from
>>>>> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>>>>
>>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something
>>>>> obvious ):
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -d
>>>
>
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
Doesn’t this vote have the necessary 3 +1 votes? Davyd, I am assuming as release manager you will be voting +1.
However, see the request to sign stuff going to Nuget. You may want to do that before you send it there.
Ralph
> On Jul 28, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Same here. I can review over the weekend.
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until Saturday.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
>>> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
>>> course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
>>>
>>> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
>>> are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
>>>
>>> -Robert Middleton
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
>>> <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
>>>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
>>>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
>>>>
>>>> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
>>>>
>>>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -d
>>
Re: log4net 2.0.15 vote
Posted by Matt Sicker <bo...@gmail.com>.
Same here. I can review over the weekend.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:51 AM Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> I haven’t forgotten about this, but I may not be able to look at it until Saturday.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually
> > released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of
> > course only happen after the release is done via this vote.
> >
> > I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures
> > are good, as I know nothing about .net development.
> >
> > -Robert Middleton
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl
> > <da...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1
> >> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however
> >> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net
> >>
> >> This is probably why download links from https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't working?
> >>
> >> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing something obvious ):
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -d
>