You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/16 03:01:58 UTC
[Dojo] Tooltips
The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo plugin.
We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have any
recommendations? I'm looking at this one:
http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine, compressed it is
25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2007/3/16, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>:
> I will do that, on that same topic I have an old question , what licenses
> can we use?
http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
HTH
Antonio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
I will do that, on that same topic I have an old question , what licenses
can we use?
musachy
On 3/16/07, Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You could ask if they'd be willing/able to change the license...
>
> On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yeah I liked that one, and compressed got to 7K, but it is GPL.
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On 3/16/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2007/3/16, Nate Drake <nd...@gmail.com>:
> > > > http://boxover.swazz.org/
> > > >
> > > > Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is.
> > >
> > > I was curious and found this in their homepage:
> > > <snip>
> > > - BoxOver is free and distributed under the GNU license
> > > </snip>
> > >
> > > GNU Licence what? GPL, LGPL? Either way, I think that cannot be used.
> > >
> > > Antonio
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Nathan Bubna <nb...@gmail.com>.
You could ask if they'd be willing/able to change the license...
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah I liked that one, and compressed got to 7K, but it is GPL.
>
> musachy
>
> On 3/16/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 2007/3/16, Nate Drake <nd...@gmail.com>:
> > > http://boxover.swazz.org/
> > >
> > > Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is.
> >
> > I was curious and found this in their homepage:
> > <snip>
> > - BoxOver is free and distributed under the GNU license
> > </snip>
> >
> > GNU Licence what? GPL, LGPL? Either way, I think that cannot be used.
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
Yeah I liked that one, and compressed got to 7K, but it is GPL.
musachy
On 3/16/07, Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2007/3/16, Nate Drake <nd...@gmail.com>:
> > http://boxover.swazz.org/
> >
> > Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is.
>
> I was curious and found this in their homepage:
> <snip>
> - BoxOver is free and distributed under the GNU license
> </snip>
>
> GNU Licence what? GPL, LGPL? Either way, I think that cannot be used.
>
> Antonio
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Antonio Petrelli <an...@gmail.com>.
2007/3/16, Nate Drake <nd...@gmail.com>:
> http://boxover.swazz.org/
>
> Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is.
I was curious and found this in their homepage:
<snip>
- BoxOver is free and distributed under the GNU license
</snip>
GNU Licence what? GPL, LGPL? Either way, I think that cannot be used.
Antonio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Nate Drake <nd...@gmail.com>.
http://boxover.swazz.org/
Claims to be under 10k, but I'm not sure what the license is.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Philip Luppens <ph...@gmail.com>.
On 3/17/07, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > After applying JSLinker, Dojo Compressor and JSMin to domTT, I got it down
> > to 21.7K, would that be acceptable?
>
>
> That's a pretty huge shrinkage, and seems reasonable to me. What do other
> folks think?
+1 Acceptable for me.
Phil
>
> --
> Marin Cooper
>
> musachy
> >
> > On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The size is 234K, by the way I didn't know you could build a Dojo
> > profile
> > > online, quite cool:
> > >
> > > http://build.dojotoolkit.org/0.4.2rc2/web/buildscripts/webbuild/
> > >
> > > musachy
> > >
> > > On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these
> > are
> > > > the
> > > > > imports on Tooltip.js:
> > > > >
> > > > > dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
> > > > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
> > > > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
> > > > > dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
> > > > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
> > > > > dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
> > > > > dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
> > > > > dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
> > > > > dojo.require(" dojo.html.iframe");
> > > > >
> > > > > ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and
> > remove
> > > > all
> > > > > the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time
> > to
> > > > do.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > OK, I just wanted to be sure we weren't overlooking the obvious. That
> > > > does
> > > > look a little hefty for just tooltips. And no, I would not recommend
> > > > trying
> > > > to shrink the size beyond what the Dojo profile mechanism already
> > > > provides.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Cooper
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > musachy
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the
> > > > dojo
> > > > > > > plugin.
> > > > > > > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys
> > > > have
> > > > > any
> > > > > > > recommendations?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a
> > > > custom
> > > > > > profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would
> > > > that
> > > > > > be?
> > > > > > Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer
> > > > external
> > > > > > code
> > > > > > bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my
> > > > book...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm looking at this one:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine,
> > > > compressed
> > > > > it
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > musachy
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
>
--
iDTV System Engineer
"Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a
violent psychopath who knows where you live." - John F. Woods
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After applying JSLinker, Dojo Compressor and JSMin to domTT, I got it down
> to 21.7K, would that be acceptable?
That's a pretty huge shrinkage, and seems reasonable to me. What do other
folks think?
--
Marin Cooper
musachy
>
> On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The size is 234K, by the way I didn't know you could build a Dojo
> profile
> > online, quite cool:
> >
> > http://build.dojotoolkit.org/0.4.2rc2/web/buildscripts/webbuild/
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these
> are
> > > the
> > > > imports on Tooltip.js:
> > > >
> > > > dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
> > > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
> > > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
> > > > dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
> > > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
> > > > dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
> > > > dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
> > > > dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
> > > > dojo.require(" dojo.html.iframe");
> > > >
> > > > ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and
> remove
> > > all
> > > > the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time
> to
> > > do.
> > >
> > >
> > > OK, I just wanted to be sure we weren't overlooking the obvious. That
> > > does
> > > look a little hefty for just tooltips. And no, I would not recommend
> > > trying
> > > to shrink the size beyond what the Dojo profile mechanism already
> > > provides.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Cooper
> > >
> > >
> > > musachy
> > > >
> > > > On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the
> > > dojo
> > > > > > plugin.
> > > > > > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys
> > > have
> > > > any
> > > > > > recommendations?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a
> > > custom
> > > > > profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would
> > > that
> > > > > be?
> > > > > Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer
> > > external
> > > > > code
> > > > > bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my
> > > book...
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Martin Cooper
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm looking at this one:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine,
> > > compressed
> > > > it
> > > > > is
> > > > > > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > musachy
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
After applying JSLinker, Dojo Compressor and JSMin to domTT, I got it down
to 21.7K, would that be acceptable?
musachy
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The size is 234K, by the way I didn't know you could build a Dojo profile
> online, quite cool:
>
> http://build.dojotoolkit.org/0.4.2rc2/web/buildscripts/webbuild/
>
> musachy
>
> On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are
> > the
> > > imports on Tooltip.js:
> > >
> > > dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
> > > dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
> > > dojo.require(" dojo.html.iframe");
> > >
> > > ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and remove
> > all
> > > the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time to
> > do.
> >
> >
> > OK, I just wanted to be sure we weren't overlooking the obvious. That
> > does
> > look a little hefty for just tooltips. And no, I would not recommend
> > trying
> > to shrink the size beyond what the Dojo profile mechanism already
> > provides.
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> >
> >
> > musachy
> > >
> > > On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper < martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the
> > dojo
> > > > > plugin.
> > > > > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys
> > have
> > > any
> > > > > recommendations?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a
> > custom
> > > > profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would
> > that
> > > > be?
> > > > Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer
> > external
> > > > code
> > > > bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my
> > book...
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Cooper
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking at this one:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> > > > >
> > > > > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine,
> > compressed
> > > it
> > > > is
> > > > > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> > > > >
> > > > > musachy
> > > > > --
> > > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
The size is 234K, by the way I didn't know you could build a Dojo profile
online, quite cool:
http://build.dojotoolkit.org/0.4.2rc2/web/buildscripts/webbuild/
musachy
On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are
> the
> > imports on Tooltip.js:
> >
> > dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
> > dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
> > dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
> > dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
> > dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
> > dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
> > dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
> > dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
> > dojo.require("dojo.html.iframe");
> >
> > ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and remove
> all
> > the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time to
> do.
>
>
> OK, I just wanted to be sure we weren't overlooking the obvious. That does
> look a little hefty for just tooltips. And no, I would not recommend
> trying
> to shrink the size beyond what the Dojo profile mechanism already
> provides.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> musachy
> >
> > On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo
> > > > plugin.
> > > > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have
> > any
> > > > recommendations?
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a custom
> > > profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would
> that
> > > be?
> > > Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer
> external
> > > code
> > > bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my book...
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Cooper
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm looking at this one:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> > > >
> > > > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine, compressed
> > it
> > > is
> > > > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> > > >
> > > > musachy
> > > > --
> > > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On 3/16/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are the
> imports on Tooltip.js:
>
> dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
> dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
> dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
> dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
> dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
> dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
> dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
> dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
> dojo.require("dojo.html.iframe");
>
> ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and remove all
> the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time to do.
OK, I just wanted to be sure we weren't overlooking the obvious. That does
look a little hefty for just tooltips. And no, I would not recommend trying
to shrink the size beyond what the Dojo profile mechanism already provides.
--
Martin Cooper
musachy
>
> On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo
> > > plugin.
> > > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have
> any
> > > recommendations?
> >
> >
> > Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a custom
> > profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would that
> > be?
> > Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer external
> > code
> > bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my book...
> >
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> >
> >
> > I'm looking at this one:
> > >
> > > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> > >
> > > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine, compressed
> it
> > is
> > > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> > >
> > > musachy
> > > --
> > > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
I was looking at that yesterday and I think it will be big, these are the
imports on Tooltip.js:
dojo.provide("dojo.widget.Tooltip");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.ContentPane");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.PopupContainer");
dojo.require("dojo.uri.Uri");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.*");
dojo.require("dojo.event.*");
dojo.require("dojo.html.style");
dojo.require("dojo.html.util");
dojo.require("dojo.html.iframe");
ContentPane alone is 23K. We can of course build a profile and remove all
the functions that are not needed, but that would take a long time to do.
musachy
On 3/16/07, Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo
> > plugin.
> > We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have any
> > recommendations?
>
>
> Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a custom
> profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would that
> be?
> Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer external
> code
> bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my book...
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> I'm looking at this one:
> >
> > http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
> >
> > which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine, compressed it
> is
> > 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
> >
> > musachy
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
Re: [Dojo] Tooltips
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On 3/15/07, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The ajaxtags are "working"(plenty of stuff to do yet) from the dojo
> plugin.
> We need to find something for the tooltips on core, do you guys have any
> recommendations?
Sorry if this is too obvious, but have we looked at building a custom
profile of Dojo that includes only the tooltip code? How big would that be?
Or is there another reason we don't want to do that? The fewer external code
bases we need to be familiar with, the better, at least in my book...
--
Martin Cooper
I'm looking at this one:
>
> http://www.mojavelinux.com/projects/domtooltip/
>
> which is under Apache 2.0 license and seems to work fine, compressed it is
> 25K, which I find still big for just tooltips.
>
> musachy
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>