[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on pull request #20148: [Update] Breeze2-on-windows

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

potiuk commented on pull request #20148:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20148#issuecomment-989913109


   > > The docs would be better in `./dev/breeze` (see the comment)
   > > @potiuk I will make a copy of BREEZE.rst with the changes about Windows and I will add it here: ./dev/breeze/docs. Is that okay?
   
   I think it woudl be better Just start "fresh" the  BREEZE documention basicaly has everything but a kitchen sink, and I think it will be better outcome if we start from zero (and maybe move relevant start from Breeze.rst and decide later what to do when we switch. 
   
   Actually - I think a simple/standard approach is to have INSTALL.md in the "project" directory. And maybe that's a good starting point ("./dev/breeze/INSTALL.md"). Md is much easier/more lightweight format for documentation and seems to be better suited for that.  Unless others have another opinion. @uranusjr WDYT? 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org