proposal: 3.1.0-pre3 and rescore update

[Daniel Quinlan <qu...@pathname.com>]

First, please review:

  http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4450

I propose that:

  1. We release pre3 and encourage people to mass-check with it (and
     extend mass-checks).  mass-checks will be faster with URIBL reuse
     anyway (SPF can be reused, but the check still has to be done since
     the NEUTRAL rules are new).

  2. I'll send an updated announcement saying as much.  I also want to
     take the chance to tweak the directions a tiny bit.

  3. We extend the mass-check period by the amount of time lost (rounded
     up to the nearest day and overlapping another weekend).  Lots of
     time.

  4. We will accept pre2 mass-checks, but prefer pre3 mass-checks.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

Re: proposal: 3.1.0-pre3 and rescore update

[Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 06:09:11PM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote:
>   1. We release pre3 and encourage people to mass-check with it (and
>      extend mass-checks).  mass-checks will be faster with URIBL reuse
>      anyway (SPF can be reused, but the check still has to be done since
>      the NEUTRAL rules are new).

We may want to do up http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4443
before doing pre3.

It'll add in a redirector that's in use.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"On the big starship of life, I think I'd be the morale officer..." - Theo

Re: proposal: 3.1.0-pre3 and rescore update

[Duncan Findlay <du...@debian.org>]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 06:12:30PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> +1.

+1 on pre3

Duncan