You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> on 2008/06/06 10:21:26 UTC
Release 1.3?
It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then there
has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like the
right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the last
couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that I can
see;
Better BPEL support
Improvements to the domain manager app
Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing
Support for validation monitoring
Databinding improvements
Performance improvements
JSR250 annotation support
OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test
Java 2 security enablement
Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime
Lots of JIRA fixes.
and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up a bit of
publicity for our TLP graduation
I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove the old
domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately)
What else has been added or changed?
I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next week
ready to cut a branch.
Thoughts?
Simon
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
+1 for 1.3 release.
BTW, Are you volunteering for Release Manager Simon ? Otherwise I
could help with that.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Mark Combellack <mc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> In your original comments, you mentioned that you wanted to remove the old
>> domain modules that we are no longer using. I was interested as to whether
>> you had a provisional list of modules that you were going to remove. I've
>> not seen a follow-up email on this subject.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Simon Laws [mailto:simonslaws@googlemail.com]
>> > Sent: 06 June 2008 09:21
>> > To: tuscany-dev
>> > Subject: Release 1.3?
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> > I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove the
>> > old
>> > domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately)
>> >
>> > What else has been added or changed?
>> >
>> > I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next week
>> > ready to cut a branch.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Simon
>>
>>
> Hi Mark, yes let me do that. I just didn't get round to it.
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Mark Combellack <mc...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> In your original comments, you mentioned that you wanted to remove the old
> domain modules that we are no longer using. I was interested as to whether
> you had a provisional list of modules that you were going to remove. I've
> not seen a follow-up email on this subject.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Laws [mailto:simonslaws@googlemail.com]
> > Sent: 06 June 2008 09:21
> > To: tuscany-dev
> > Subject: Release 1.3?
>
> <snip>
>
> > I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove the
> > old
> > domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately)
> >
> > What else has been added or changed?
> >
> > I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next week
> > ready to cut a branch.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Simon
>
>
Hi Mark, yes let me do that. I just didn't get round to it.
Regards
Simon
RE: Release 1.3?
Posted by Mark Combellack <mc...@apache.org>.
Hi Simon,
In your original comments, you mentioned that you wanted to remove the old
domain modules that we are no longer using. I was interested as to whether
you had a provisional list of modules that you were going to remove. I've
not seen a follow-up email on this subject.
Thanks,
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Laws [mailto:simonslaws@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 06 June 2008 09:21
> To: tuscany-dev
> Subject: Release 1.3?
<snip>
> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove the
> old
> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately)
>
> What else has been added or changed?
>
> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next week
> ready to cut a branch.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Simon
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:43 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm back after a couple of weeks on holiday and catching up on the mailing
> list, what is the status of this 1.3 release and how can I help get it out?
> Start picking up JIRAs in Java-SCA-1.3, test run all the samples, checking
> legal files, ...?
>
> ...ant
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Mike Edwards <
> mike.edwards.inglenook@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi Luciano
> >>
> >> I'd like to keep a pretty close watch on how we change the branch this
> >> time
> >> so I would like all changes to be backed up with a JIRA even for
> >> committers. As for what changes we allow. I think we'll assume we are
> >> functionally complete when we cut the branch and concentrate on any JIRA
> >> that people think need to go into 1.3 to make it a good release. As long
> >> as
> >> we do that through JIRA we should be able to control it. I'll open the
> >> 1.3
> >> JIRA category when I cut the branch.
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >>
> > +1 from me.
> >
> >
> > Yours, Mike.
> >
>
Yes please, all of the above.
Here are the JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
Here is the summary page I've been using
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist
If you look at the mail list there has apparently been little activity in
1.3 in the last week. I say "apparently" as this is a product of mails being
sent to the old tuscay-dev going missing. Having said this the JIRA and
summary page should give a good indication of where we are.
Thanks
Simon
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
I'm back after a couple of weeks on holiday and catching up on the mailing
list, what is the status of this 1.3 release and how can I help get it out?
Start picking up JIRAs in Java-SCA-1.3, test run all the samples, checking
legal files, ...?
...ant
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Mike Edwards <
mike.edwards.inglenook@gmail.com> wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Luciano
>>
>> I'd like to keep a pretty close watch on how we change the branch this
>> time
>> so I would like all changes to be backed up with a JIRA even for
>> committers. As for what changes we allow. I think we'll assume we are
>> functionally complete when we cut the branch and concentrate on any JIRA
>> that people think need to go into 1.3 to make it a good release. As long
>> as
>> we do that through JIRA we should be able to control it. I'll open the
>> 1.3
>> JIRA category when I cut the branch.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
> +1 from me.
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
Simon Laws wrote:
>
> Hi Luciano
>
> I'd like to keep a pretty close watch on how we change the branch this time
> so I would like all changes to be backed up with a JIRA even for
> committers. As for what changes we allow. I think we'll assume we are
> functionally complete when we cut the branch and concentrate on any JIRA
> that people think need to go into 1.3 to make it a good release. As long as
> we do that through JIRA we should be able to control it. I'll open the 1.3
> JIRA category when I cut the branch.
>
> Simon
>
+1 from me.
Yours, Mike.
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 for Simon L as RM and for cutting the release over the weekend.
>
> BTW, any specific guidelines for adding changes to the 1.3 branch ?
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 to cut 1.3 branch.
> >
> > Raymond
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Simon Laws" <si...@googlemail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM
> > To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>; <an...@apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Release 1.3?
> >
> >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws <
> simonslaws@googlemail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <na...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Mike Edwards wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Simon Laws wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since
> >
> >>> > >>> >>> then
> >>> > >>> there
> >>> > >>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It
> feels
> >>> > like
> >>> > >>> the
> >>> > >>> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list
> over
> >>> the
> >>> > >>> last
> >>> > >>> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion >
> >>> > >>> >>> that
> >>> I
> >>> > >>> can
> >>> > >>> see;
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> Better BPEL support
> >>> > >>> Improvements to the domain manager app
> >>> > >>> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing
> >>> > >>> Support for validation monitoring
> >>> > >>> Databinding improvements
> >>> > >>> Performance improvements
> >>> > >>> JSR250 annotation support
> >>> > >>> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test
> >>> > >>> Java 2 security enablement
> >>> > >>> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime
> >>> > >>> Lots of JIRA fixes.
> >>> > >>> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum
> up
> >>> > >>> > >>> a
> >>> > bit
> >>> > >>> of
> >>> > >>> publicity for our TLP graduation
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and >
> >>>
> >>> > >>> remove
> >>> > the
> >>> > >>> old
> >>> > >>> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this > >>>
> >>> > >>> separately)
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> What else has been added or changed?
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off
> next
> >>> week
> >>> > >>> ready to cut a branch.
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> Thoughts?
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> Simon
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> Yes, I give a +1.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of
> more
> >>> > >> sophisticated itests/samples as well and the release will be a
> good
> >>> > spur.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Yours, Mike.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> I think this is a good time to do a 1.3 release. This would make
> >>> > > the new runtime Java2WSDL generation available to Tuscany users,
> >>> > > and resolve a number of issues with the previous code generation
> >>> > > that used Axis2. The other improvements listed are valuable as
> well.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Simon
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > OK, so it looks like people want to do this
> >>> >
> >>> > Re. Luciano's question about RM. I'll volunteer to be RM this time >
> >>> > round
> >>> > and
> >>> > all help is greatly appreciated. If though Luciano (or anyone else
> for
> >>> that
> >>> > matter) you are keen to RM this time then I won't fight you for it;-)
> >>> Would
> >>> > seem a little unfair though as you did the last one.
> >>> >
> >>> > Anyone have things they are working one that would stop us moving >
> >>> > forward
> >>> > with this and cutting the R1.3 branch at the end of this week?
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards
> >>> >
> >>> > Simon
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> +1 to Simon as RM and taking the branch at the end of this week.
> >>>
> >>> ...ant
> >>
> >>
> >> We'll I'm not hearing any comments against. I'll probably take the
> branch
> >> at
> >> the weekend when things are a little quieter. I've still got changes I
> >> want
> >> to make in trunk before then which are taking longer than I had hoped.
> So
> >> if
> >> everyone could get all the changes they want to make done by close of
> play
> >> Friday and ensure that we're getting a clean build then that will be a
> >> good
> >> base to take the branch from. Any problems let me know.
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> Apache Tuscany Committer
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Hi Luciano
I'd like to keep a pretty close watch on how we change the branch this time
so I would like all changes to be backed up with a JIRA even for
committers. As for what changes we allow. I think we'll assume we are
functionally complete when we cut the branch and concentrate on any JIRA
that people think need to go into 1.3 to make it a good release. As long as
we do that through JIRA we should be able to control it. I'll open the 1.3
JIRA category when I cut the branch.
Simon
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
+1 for Simon L as RM and for cutting the release over the weekend.
BTW, any specific guidelines for adding changes to the 1.3 branch ?
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to cut 1.3 branch.
>
> Raymond
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Simon Laws" <si...@googlemail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM
> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>; <an...@apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Release 1.3?
>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Mike Edwards wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Simon Laws wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since >
>>> > >>> >>> then
>>> > >>> there
>>> > >>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels
>>> > like
>>> > >>> the
>>> > >>> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over
>>> the
>>> > >>> last
>>> > >>> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion >
>>> > >>> >>> that
>>> I
>>> > >>> can
>>> > >>> see;
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Better BPEL support
>>> > >>> Improvements to the domain manager app
>>> > >>> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing
>>> > >>> Support for validation monitoring
>>> > >>> Databinding improvements
>>> > >>> Performance improvements
>>> > >>> JSR250 annotation support
>>> > >>> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test
>>> > >>> Java 2 security enablement
>>> > >>> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime
>>> > >>> Lots of JIRA fixes.
>>> > >>> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up
>>> > >>> > >>> a
>>> > bit
>>> > >>> of
>>> > >>> publicity for our TLP graduation
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and > >>>
>>> > >>> remove
>>> > the
>>> > >>> old
>>> > >>> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this > >>>
>>> > >>> separately)
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> What else has been added or changed?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next
>>> week
>>> > >>> ready to cut a branch.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Thoughts?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Simon
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Yes, I give a +1.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of more
>>> > >> sophisticated itests/samples as well and the release will be a good
>>> > spur.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Yours, Mike.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I think this is a good time to do a 1.3 release. This would make
>>> > > the new runtime Java2WSDL generation available to Tuscany users,
>>> > > and resolve a number of issues with the previous code generation
>>> > > that used Axis2. The other improvements listed are valuable as well.
>>> > >
>>> > > Simon
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > OK, so it looks like people want to do this
>>> >
>>> > Re. Luciano's question about RM. I'll volunteer to be RM this time >
>>> > round
>>> > and
>>> > all help is greatly appreciated. If though Luciano (or anyone else for
>>> that
>>> > matter) you are keen to RM this time then I won't fight you for it;-)
>>> Would
>>> > seem a little unfair though as you did the last one.
>>> >
>>> > Anyone have things they are working one that would stop us moving >
>>> > forward
>>> > with this and cutting the R1.3 branch at the end of this week?
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> >
>>> > Simon
>>> >
>>>
>>> +1 to Simon as RM and taking the branch at the end of this week.
>>>
>>> ...ant
>>
>>
>> We'll I'm not hearing any comments against. I'll probably take the branch
>> at
>> the weekend when things are a little quieter. I've still got changes I
>> want
>> to make in trunk before then which are taking longer than I had hoped. So
>> if
>> everyone could get all the changes they want to make done by close of play
>> Friday and ensure that we're getting a clean build then that will be a
>> good
>> base to take the branch from. Any problems let me know.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
+1 to cut 1.3 branch.
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Simon Laws" <si...@googlemail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 6:26 AM
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>; <an...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Release 1.3?
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Mike Edwards wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Simon Laws wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since
>> > >>> then
>> > >>> there
>> > >>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels
>> > like
>> > >>> the
>> > >>> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over
>> the
>> > >>> last
>> > >>> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion
>> > >>> that
>> I
>> > >>> can
>> > >>> see;
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Better BPEL support
>> > >>> Improvements to the domain manager app
>> > >>> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing
>> > >>> Support for validation monitoring
>> > >>> Databinding improvements
>> > >>> Performance improvements
>> > >>> JSR250 annotation support
>> > >>> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test
>> > >>> Java 2 security enablement
>> > >>> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime
>> > >>> Lots of JIRA fixes.
>> > >>> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up
>> > >>> a
>> > bit
>> > >>> of
>> > >>> publicity for our TLP graduation
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and
>> > >>> remove
>> > the
>> > >>> old
>> > >>> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this
>> > >>> separately)
>> > >>>
>> > >>> What else has been added or changed?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next
>> week
>> > >>> ready to cut a branch.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thoughts?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Simon
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Yes, I give a +1.
>> > >>
>> > >> BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of more
>> > >> sophisticated itests/samples as well and the release will be a good
>> > spur.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Yours, Mike.
>> > >>
>> > >> I think this is a good time to do a 1.3 release. This would make
>> > > the new runtime Java2WSDL generation available to Tuscany users,
>> > > and resolve a number of issues with the previous code generation
>> > > that used Axis2. The other improvements listed are valuable as well.
>> > >
>> > > Simon
>> > >
>> > >
>> > OK, so it looks like people want to do this
>> >
>> > Re. Luciano's question about RM. I'll volunteer to be RM this time
>> > round
>> > and
>> > all help is greatly appreciated. If though Luciano (or anyone else for
>> that
>> > matter) you are keen to RM this time then I won't fight you for it;-)
>> Would
>> > seem a little unfair though as you did the last one.
>> >
>> > Anyone have things they are working one that would stop us moving
>> > forward
>> > with this and cutting the R1.3 branch at the end of this week?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Simon
>> >
>>
>> +1 to Simon as RM and taking the branch at the end of this week.
>>
>> ...ant
>
>
> We'll I'm not hearing any comments against. I'll probably take the branch
> at
> the weekend when things are a little quieter. I've still got changes I
> want
> to make in trunk before then which are taking longer than I had hoped. So
> if
> everyone could get all the changes they want to make done by close of play
> Friday and ensure that we're getting a clean build then that will be a
> good
> base to take the branch from. Any problems let me know.
>
> Simon
>
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:47 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Mike Edwards wrote:
> > >
> > >> Simon Laws wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then
> > >>> there
> > >>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels
> > like
> > >>> the
> > >>> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over
> the
> > >>> last
> > >>> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that
> I
> > >>> can
> > >>> see;
> > >>>
> > >>> Better BPEL support
> > >>> Improvements to the domain manager app
> > >>> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing
> > >>> Support for validation monitoring
> > >>> Databinding improvements
> > >>> Performance improvements
> > >>> JSR250 annotation support
> > >>> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test
> > >>> Java 2 security enablement
> > >>> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime
> > >>> Lots of JIRA fixes.
> > >>> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up a
> > bit
> > >>> of
> > >>> publicity for our TLP graduation
> > >>>
> > >>> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove
> > the
> > >>> old
> > >>> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately)
> > >>>
> > >>> What else has been added or changed?
> > >>>
> > >>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next
> week
> > >>> ready to cut a branch.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thoughts?
> > >>>
> > >>> Simon
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, I give a +1.
> > >>
> > >> BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of more
> > >> sophisticated itests/samples as well and the release will be a good
> > spur.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Yours, Mike.
> > >>
> > >> I think this is a good time to do a 1.3 release. This would make
> > > the new runtime Java2WSDL generation available to Tuscany users,
> > > and resolve a number of issues with the previous code generation
> > > that used Axis2. The other improvements listed are valuable as well.
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> > >
> > OK, so it looks like people want to do this
> >
> > Re. Luciano's question about RM. I'll volunteer to be RM this time round
> > and
> > all help is greatly appreciated. If though Luciano (or anyone else for
> that
> > matter) you are keen to RM this time then I won't fight you for it;-)
> Would
> > seem a little unfair though as you did the last one.
> >
> > Anyone have things they are working one that would stop us moving forward
> > with this and cutting the R1.3 branch at the end of this week?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Simon
> >
>
> +1 to Simon as RM and taking the branch at the end of this week.
>
> ...ant
We'll I'm not hearing any comments against. I'll probably take the branch at
the weekend when things are a little quieter. I've still got changes I want
to make in trunk before then which are taking longer than I had hoped. So if
everyone could get all the changes they want to make done by close of play
Friday and ensure that we're getting a clean build then that will be a good
base to take the branch from. Any problems let me know.
Simon
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Mike Edwards wrote:
> >
> >> Simon Laws wrote:
> >>
> >>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then
> >>> there
> >>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels
> like
> >>> the
> >>> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the
> >>> last
> >>> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that I
> >>> can
> >>> see;
> >>>
> >>> Better BPEL support
> >>> Improvements to the domain manager app
> >>> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing
> >>> Support for validation monitoring
> >>> Databinding improvements
> >>> Performance improvements
> >>> JSR250 annotation support
> >>> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test
> >>> Java 2 security enablement
> >>> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime
> >>> Lots of JIRA fixes.
> >>> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up a
> bit
> >>> of
> >>> publicity for our TLP graduation
> >>>
> >>> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove
> the
> >>> old
> >>> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately)
> >>>
> >>> What else has been added or changed?
> >>>
> >>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next week
> >>> ready to cut a branch.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Simon
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I give a +1.
> >>
> >> BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of more
> >> sophisticated itests/samples as well and the release will be a good
> spur.
> >>
> >>
> >> Yours, Mike.
> >>
> >> I think this is a good time to do a 1.3 release. This would make
> > the new runtime Java2WSDL generation available to Tuscany users,
> > and resolve a number of issues with the previous code generation
> > that used Axis2. The other improvements listed are valuable as well.
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
> OK, so it looks like people want to do this
>
> Re. Luciano's question about RM. I'll volunteer to be RM this time round
> and
> all help is greatly appreciated. If though Luciano (or anyone else for that
> matter) you are keen to RM this time then I won't fight you for it;-) Would
> seem a little unfair though as you did the last one.
>
> Anyone have things they are working one that would stop us moving forward
> with this and cutting the R1.3 branch at the end of this week?
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
+1 to Simon as RM and taking the branch at the end of this week.
...ant
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> Mike Edwards wrote:
>
>> Simon Laws wrote:
>>
>>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then
>>> there
>>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like
>>> the
>>> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the
>>> last
>>> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that I
>>> can
>>> see;
>>>
>>> Better BPEL support
>>> Improvements to the domain manager app
>>> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing
>>> Support for validation monitoring
>>> Databinding improvements
>>> Performance improvements
>>> JSR250 annotation support
>>> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test
>>> Java 2 security enablement
>>> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime
>>> Lots of JIRA fixes.
>>> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up a bit
>>> of
>>> publicity for our TLP graduation
>>>
>>> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove the
>>> old
>>> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately)
>>>
>>> What else has been added or changed?
>>>
>>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next week
>>> ready to cut a branch.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>> Yes, I give a +1.
>>
>> BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of more
>> sophisticated itests/samples as well and the release will be a good spur.
>>
>>
>> Yours, Mike.
>>
>> I think this is a good time to do a 1.3 release. This would make
> the new runtime Java2WSDL generation available to Tuscany users,
> and resolve a number of issues with the previous code generation
> that used Axis2. The other improvements listed are valuable as well.
>
> Simon
>
>
OK, so it looks like people want to do this
Re. Luciano's question about RM. I'll volunteer to be RM this time round and
all help is greatly appreciated. If though Luciano (or anyone else for that
matter) you are keen to RM this time then I won't fight you for it;-) Would
seem a little unfair though as you did the last one.
Anyone have things they are working one that would stop us moving forward
with this and cutting the R1.3 branch at the end of this week?
Regards
Simon
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Simon Nash <na...@apache.org>.
Mike Edwards wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then
>> there
>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels
>> like the
>> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the
>> last
>> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that I
>> can
>> see;
>>
>> Better BPEL support
>> Improvements to the domain manager app
>> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing
>> Support for validation monitoring
>> Databinding improvements
>> Performance improvements
>> JSR250 annotation support
>> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test
>> Java 2 security enablement
>> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime
>> Lots of JIRA fixes.
>> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up a
>> bit of
>> publicity for our TLP graduation
>>
>> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove
>> the old
>> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately)
>>
>> What else has been added or changed?
>>
>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next week
>> ready to cut a branch.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Simon
>>
> Yes, I give a +1.
>
> BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of more
> sophisticated itests/samples as well and the release will be a good spur.
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
I think this is a good time to do a 1.3 release. This would make
the new runtime Java2WSDL generation available to Tuscany users,
and resolve a number of issues with the previous code generation
that used Axis2. The other improvements listed are valuable as well.
Simon
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
Simon Laws wrote:
> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then there
> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like the
> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the last
> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that I can
> see;
>
> Better BPEL support
> Improvements to the domain manager app
> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing
> Support for validation monitoring
> Databinding improvements
> Performance improvements
> JSR250 annotation support
> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test
> Java 2 security enablement
> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime
> Lots of JIRA fixes.
> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up a bit of
> publicity for our TLP graduation
>
> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove the old
> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately)
>
> What else has been added or changed?
>
> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next week
> ready to cut a branch.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Simon
>
Yes, I give a +1.
BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of more sophisticated itests/samples as
well and the release will be a good spur.
Yours, Mike.
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by Dan Becker <da...@gmail.com>.
ant elder wrote:
> +1 from me.
+1 from me also. Seems like a good time.
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
Re: Release 1.3?
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me. Incidentally I've spent a bit of time over the last couple of
days trying all the various samples and demos etc with the latest trunk code
and its all looking in quite good shape so it does seem like a fine time to
be taking a release branch.
...ant
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then there
> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like
> the
> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the last
> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that I can
> see;
>
> Better BPEL support
> Improvements to the domain manager app
> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing
> Support for validation monitoring
> Databinding improvements
> Performance improvements
> JSR250 annotation support
> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test
> Java 2 security enablement
> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime
> Lots of JIRA fixes.
> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up a bit
> of
> publicity for our TLP graduation
>
> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove the
> old
> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately)
>
> What else has been added or changed?
>
> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next week
> ready to cut a branch.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Simon
>