You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Peyman Faratin <pe...@robustlinks.com> on 2013/09/04 19:51:11 UTC

subindex

Hi

Is there a way to build a new (smaller) index from an existing (larger) index where the smaller index contains a subset of the fields of the larger index? 

thank you

Re: subindex

Posted by Peyman Faratin <pe...@robustlinks.com>.
Hi Erick

it makes sense. Thank you for this. 

peyman

On Sep 5, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Nope. You can do this if you've stored _all_ the fields (with the exception
> of
> _version_ and the destinations of copyField directives). But there's no way
> I
> know of to do what you want if you haven't.
> 
> If you have, you'd be essentially spinning through all your docs and
> re-indexing
> just the fields you cared about. But if you still have access to your
> original
> docs this would be slower/more complicated than just re-indexing from
> scratch.
> 
> Best
> Erick
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Peyman Faratin <pe...@robustlinks.com>wrote:
> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> Is there a way to build a new (smaller) index from an existing (larger)
>> index where the smaller index contains a subset of the fields of the larger
>> index?
>> 
>> thank you


Re: subindex

Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
Nope. You can do this if you've stored _all_ the fields (with the exception
of
_version_ and the destinations of copyField directives). But there's no way
I
know of to do what you want if you haven't.

If you have, you'd be essentially spinning through all your docs and
re-indexing
just the fields you cared about. But if you still have access to your
original
docs this would be slower/more complicated than just re-indexing from
scratch.

Best
Erick


On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Peyman Faratin <pe...@robustlinks.com>wrote:

> Hi
>
> Is there a way to build a new (smaller) index from an existing (larger)
> index where the smaller index contains a subset of the fields of the larger
> index?
>
> thank you