You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ctakes.apache.org by "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> on 2012/11/27 01:00:11 UTC
cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
Hi,
Release cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review. The files are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/RCs/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc3/target/
The main differences since RC2 is:
CTAKES-53 - move UMLS out of Apache distribution
This is available on sourceforge.net instead (http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=net/sourceforge/ctakesresources/ctakes-resources-distribution/3.0.0/ctakes-resources*)
The full release notes are available at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313621&version=12322969
Thanks,
Pei
RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
Posted by "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu>.
I don't have projects that depend on cTAKES in any more meaningful of a way than what can be tested by comparing the xcas generated by this release to the xcas output of a previous release. xcas_comparison.Compare was written for this, although first you'll need to do a search/replace within one set of the xcas files for the type system changes.
Hopefully someone among our user base will reply to your email with a suggestion.
Repeat of testing of components you are familiar with is the biggest way I see for now. There are multiple aggregates to be tested across all the components.
________________________________________
From: ctakes-dev-return-923-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [ctakes-dev-return-923-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] on behalf of Steven Bethard [steven.bethard@Colorado.EDU]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 5:30 AM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:00 AM, "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Release cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review. The files are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/RCs/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc3/target/
So what do people recommend for "reviewing" such a release? I mentioned before that the ideal review, to me, would be to take this release, use it in some project that depends on cTAKES, and run that project's tests to make sure everything works. But I don't actually have any projects of my own that depend on cTAKES.
Are there other ways I could usefully review this RC?
Steve
RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
Posted by "Bleeker, Troy C." <Bl...@mayo.edu>.
We should build from scratch as a new developer would. I could do it but I'm tied up for a few days.
Thanks
Troy
-----Original Message-----
From: ctakes-dev-return-927-Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-927-Bleeker.Troy=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] On Behalf Of Chen, Pei
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 8:55 AM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
One more thing in addition to what James mentioned, Since this is our first release from ASF, it might be good to verify the below (perhaps our mentors could also chime in in case we miss anything) before we send out a VOTE email.
I think some of things people on general@ look for include:
Sig: OK?
Hashes: OK?
RAT: OK?
Source: OK?
Build: OK?
Tests: OK?
License/Notice: OK?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:Masanz.James@mayo.edu]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:05 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
>
>
> I don't have something that uses cTAKES and exercises enough of it to
> be helpful. Hopefully someone from our user base will reply.
>
> What I was envisioning is that each person who has worked on some
> component, rerun any tests on those component(s) and also do some
> artistic testing, eyeballing a few results and looking for oddities.
>
> xcas_comparison.Compare was written for comparing 2 sets of xcas. So
> for components that are not new, you could compare the output of a
> previous release with the output of this RC. It doesn't handle/know
> about the changes to the type system package names, so you'd have to
> do global find/replace first.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: ctakes-dev-return-923-
> Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [ctakes-dev-return-923-
> Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] on behalf of Steven
> Bethard [steven.bethard@Colorado.EDU]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 5:30 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:00 AM, "Chen, Pei"
> <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
> > Release cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review. The files
> > are
> available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/RCs/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-
> rc3/target/
>
> So what do people recommend for "reviewing" such a release? I
> mentioned before that the ideal review, to me, would be to take this
> release, use it in some project that depends on cTAKES, and run that
> project's tests to make sure everything works. But I don't actually
> have any projects of my own that depend on cTAKES.
>
> Are there other ways I could usefully review this RC?
>
> Steve
RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
Posted by "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu>.
One more thing in addition to what James mentioned, Since this is our first release from ASF, it might be good to verify the below (perhaps our mentors could also chime in in case we miss anything) before we send out a VOTE email.
I think some of things people on general@ look for include:
Sig: OK?
Hashes: OK?
RAT: OK?
Source: OK?
Build: OK?
Tests: OK?
License/Notice: OK?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:Masanz.James@mayo.edu]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:05 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
>
>
> I don't have something that uses cTAKES and exercises enough of it to be
> helpful. Hopefully someone from our user base will reply.
>
> What I was envisioning is that each person who has worked on some
> component, rerun any tests on those component(s) and also do some artistic
> testing, eyeballing a few results and looking for oddities.
>
> xcas_comparison.Compare was written for comparing 2 sets of xcas. So for
> components that are not new, you could compare the output of a previous
> release with the output of this RC. It doesn't handle/know about the
> changes to the type system package names, so you'd have to do global
> find/replace first.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: ctakes-dev-return-923-
> Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [ctakes-dev-return-923-
> Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] on behalf of Steven
> Bethard [steven.bethard@Colorado.EDU]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 5:30 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:00 AM, "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
> > Release cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review. The files are
> available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/RCs/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-
> rc3/target/
>
> So what do people recommend for "reviewing" such a release? I mentioned
> before that the ideal review, to me, would be to take this release, use it in
> some project that depends on cTAKES, and run that project's tests to make
> sure everything works. But I don't actually have any projects of my own that
> depend on cTAKES.
>
> Are there other ways I could usefully review this RC?
>
> Steve
RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
Posted by "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu>.
I don't have something that uses cTAKES and exercises enough of it to be helpful. Hopefully someone from our user base will reply.
What I was envisioning is that each person who has worked on some component, rerun any tests on those component(s) and also do some artistic testing, eyeballing a few results and looking for oddities.
xcas_comparison.Compare was written for comparing 2 sets of xcas. So for components that are not new, you could compare the output of a previous release with the output of this RC. It doesn't handle/know about the changes to the type system package names, so you'd have to do global find/replace first.
________________________________________
From: ctakes-dev-return-923-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [ctakes-dev-return-923-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] on behalf of Steven Bethard [steven.bethard@Colorado.EDU]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 5:30 AM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:00 AM, "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Release cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review. The files are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/RCs/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc3/target/
So what do people recommend for "reviewing" such a release? I mentioned before that the ideal review, to me, would be to take this release, use it in some project that depends on cTAKES, and run that project's tests to make sure everything works. But I don't actually have any projects of my own that depend on cTAKES.
Are there other ways I could usefully review this RC?
Steve
Re: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
Posted by Steven Bethard <st...@Colorado.EDU>.
On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:00 AM, "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Release cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review. The files are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/RCs/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc3/target/
So what do people recommend for "reviewing" such a release? I mentioned before that the ideal review, to me, would be to take this release, use it in some project that depends on cTAKES, and run that project's tests to make sure everything works. But I don't actually have any projects of my own that depend on cTAKES.
Are there other ways I could usefully review this RC?
Steve
RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
Posted by "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu>.
> I downloaded these two zips (listed below) and noticed that the LICENSE and
> NOTICE files are different within the two. Oversight or intentional? It
> appears intentional but wanted to double check.
> apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.zip
> apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src.zip
Yes; done by intention.
Basically, the binary distribution contains all 3rd party libraries and mentions them in the LICENSE/NOTICE.
The source code/files doesn't bundle 3rd party libs and only contains what it needs so it should be much shorter.
--Pei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:Masanz.James@mayo.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:17 AM
> To: 'ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
>
> I downloaded these two zips (listed below) and noticed that the LICENSE and
> NOTICE files are different within the two. Oversight or intentional? It
> appears intentional but wanted to double check.
>
> apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.zip
> apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src.zip
>
> -- James
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ctakes-dev-return-906-
> Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-906-
> > Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] On Behalf Of Chen, Pei
> > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 6:03 PM
> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
> >
> > Note: The ctakes-resources link should have been:
> > http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Ca%3A%22ctakes-
> resources-
> > distribution%22
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chen, Pei [mailto:Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 7:01 PM
> > > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Release cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review. The files
> > > are available at:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/RCs/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc3/ta
> > > rg
> > > et/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The main differences since RC2 is:
> > > CTAKES-53 - move UMLS out of Apache distribution This is available
> > > on sourceforge.net instead
> > >
> (http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=net/sourceforge/ctak
> > > es
> > > r
> > > esources/ctakes-resources-distribution/3.0.0/ctakes-resources*)
> > >
> > > The full release notes are available at:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=123
> > > 13
> > > 621
> > > &version=12322969
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Pei
RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
Posted by "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu>.
I downloaded these two zips (listed below) and noticed that the LICENSE and NOTICE files are different within the two. Oversight or intentional? It appears intentional but wanted to double check.
apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.zip
apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src.zip
-- James
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-906-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-906-
> Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] On Behalf Of Chen, Pei
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 6:03 PM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
>
> Note: The ctakes-resources link should have been:
> http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Ca%3A%22ctakes-resources-
> distribution%22
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chen, Pei [mailto:Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu]
> > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 7:01 PM
> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Release cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review. The files
> > are available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/RCs/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc3/targ
> > et/
> >
> >
> >
> > The main differences since RC2 is:
> > CTAKES-53 - move UMLS out of Apache distribution This is available on
> > sourceforge.net instead
> > (http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=net/sourceforge/ctakes
> > r
> > esources/ctakes-resources-distribution/3.0.0/ctakes-resources*)
> >
> > The full release notes are available at:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313
> > 621
> > &version=12322969
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Pei
RE: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
Posted by "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu>.
Note: The ctakes-resources link should have been: http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Ca%3A%22ctakes-resources-distribution%22
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chen, Pei [mailto:Pei.Chen@childrens.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 7:01 PM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review
>
> Hi,
>
> Release cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC3 is ready for review. The files are
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/RCs/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc3/target/
>
>
>
> The main differences since RC2 is:
> CTAKES-53 - move UMLS out of Apache distribution This is available on
> sourceforge.net instead
> (http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=net/sourceforge/ctakesr
> esources/ctakes-resources-distribution/3.0.0/ctakes-resources*)
>
> The full release notes are available at:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313621
> &version=12322969
>
> Thanks,
> Pei