You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to droids-dev@incubator.apache.org by "Richard Frovarp (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/06/15 02:46:44 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (DROIDS-123) Better formatting consistency for the
Droids codebase
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DROIDS-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Richard Frovarp updated DROIDS-123:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.2.0)
0.3.0
> Better formatting consistency for the Droids codebase
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROIDS-123
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DROIDS-123
> Project: Droids
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 0.2.0
> Reporter: Eugen Paraschiv
> Fix For: 0.3.0
>
> Attachments: DROIDS-123-introducing-jalopy.patch, DROIDS-123_step1_v1.patch, DROIDS-123_step2_v1.patch, eclipse-java-profile.xml
>
>
> The formatting in droids should effectively be the same as the standard Java Conventions build in Eclipse formatter. However, the are multiple formatting inconsistencies in the droids codebas.
> Examples:
> 1. braces
> - SimpleTaskQueue - even in the same class, there are cases where the opening braces are on the same line as the method signature:
> public T next() {
> and cases where they are not:
> public void clear()
> {
> 2. whitespace
> - sometimes there is a whitespace between a 'for' and the '('
> for (
> and sometimes there is not:
> for(
> The proposal to deal with this is to start with the Java build in formatter in Eclipse (with a few minor changes), and format the entire droids codebase - the changes should be minor in most cases.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira