RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/interop4/groupH/complexRP Cenc ComplexRpcEncServiceTestCase.java

[Tom Jordahl <to...@macromedia.com>]

Look guys, you all can't have it both ways.

Sam says - "why do you have this branch, I'm not going to use it"
Russell says - "you can't merge this crap on to HEAD"

Fine, Sam, Russell could you please work out what YOU would like to happen.

Since we are once again scrambling to get our s**t together before tomorrow 10:00am so we can do some real interop with other folks, we just don't have time to fix all the broken WSDL in our functional tests, which is (probably) why they don't pass.

(and yeah, I'm in a bad mood this morning)

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development



-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Butek [mailto:butek@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:19 AM
To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: RE: cvs commit:
xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/interop4/groupH/complexRP Cenc
ComplexRpcEncServiceTestCase.java






Whoa!  You will merge interop4 to HEAD!?!?!  I'll veto that right now.  It
doesn't pass functional-tests!  We NEED to keep the head branch clean.

Russell Butek
butek@us.ibm.com


Tom Jordahl <to...@macromedia.com> on 10/07/2002 09:27:39 AM

Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org

To:    "'axis-dev@xml.apache.org'" <ax...@xml.apache.org>
cc:
Subject:    RE: cvs commit:
       xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/interop4/groupH/complexRP    Cenc
       ComplexRpcEncServiceTestCase.java




OK, Dims needs both the header and interop4 branch.
We don't pass all-tests, but Dims said he would fix that as Glen and I are
still working on the interop tests (which is much higher priority).

So Glen and I will merge interop4 to HEAD.
Dims will take a look at fixing the functional-tests which fail.
The header stuff can go it also.

I am not happy with putting our source tree in to a CVS cuisinart mere
hours before walking in to the interop, but it seems we have no choice.


--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development



-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:rubys@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:56 AM
To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: RE: cvs commit:
xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/interop4/groupH/complexRPCenc
ComplexRpcEncServiceTestCase.java


Sam Ruby
 >
 > But Glen and I have been running hard and fast (particularly with
 > respect to running all the functional tests before check in ;-) so we
 > didn't want to mess up the world.
 >
 > The tests don't pass right now on the branch, otherwise I would say
 > we should merge to HEAD and continue our work.  We still have lots of
 > work to do today (doc/lit faults).  Have you had a chance to work on
 > the attachment tests Sam?  I think that is our biggest hole for
 > tomorrow.

So the plan is to go into soapbuilders with a version of Axis that
doesn't pass the functional tests?  I'm not sure that is wise.

 > In any case, is someone wants to pick up the interop4 branch and fix
 > the functional tests today, that would be great, otherwise we can
 > just wait till after the interop.

Anything I check in will be on the HEAD.

- Sam Ruby

Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/interop4/groupH/complexRP Cenc ComplexRpcEncServiceTestCase.java

[Sam Ruby <ru...@apache.org>]

Tom Jordahl wrote:
 > Look guys, you all can't have it both ways.
 >
 > Sam says - "why do you have this branch, I'm not going to use it"
 > Russell says - "you can't merge this crap on to HEAD"
 >
 > Fine, Sam, Russell could you please work out what YOU would like to
 > happen.
 >
 > Since we are once again scrambling to get our s**t together before
 > tomorrow 10:00am so we can do some real interop with other folks, we
 > just don't have time to fix all the broken WSDL in our functional
 > tests, which is (probably) why they don't pass.
 >
 > (and yeah, I'm in a bad mood this morning)

We do have differences in perspectives.  Sometimes the best way to work 
through this is to talk it out.

My development process is to start with a clean checkout, verify that it 
passes all tests.  Make whatever changes I feel are appropriate.  Verify 
that the result still passes all tests.  And then commit.

 From my perspective, keeping the functional tests running clean is a 
discipline that benefits us all.  Going off and making a bunch of 
experimental changes without respecting that immediately prior to a 
SOAPBuilder event is a bit... er, um, unwise.

My preference is that whavever changes are safe to merge back to HEAD 
should be done so ASAP.  Everything else doesn't make this round of 
SOAPBuilders.

- Sam Ruby