You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@buildr.apache.org by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com> on 2010/04/23 00:27:08 UTC
Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
Thanks,
Antoine
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com> wrote:
>> 1882 examples, 48 failures
>> rake aborted!
>> Command C:/Ruby/bin/ruby.exe [...] failed
>
> Not sure. If you run with --trace, it gives a lot more info and should send
> a backtrace.
I think maybe the "error" I reported after running "rake spec" is
normal? It's rake saying, "Hey, that task 'spec' you ran failed!"
because the number of failures is non-zero. Can anyone who uses
rake/RSpec more than me confirm?
> The fix is to remove 1.3.0. What happens is that Buildr requires a few gems,
> which lazily require rspec with version >0, and your system picks up the
> latest version. When buildr gets around to dictate to start 1.2.9, rubygems
> throws an error.
Confirmed that uninstalling rspec 1.3.0 fixes those particular specs.
Still 48 failures mostly related to Windows filesystem stuff.
Thanks,
-- Will
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
Thanks for the bug. Comments below:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:19, Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
> wrote:
> > Also, can you please open a bug with the output of the testing you made ?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-427
>
> Also, I just realized I get an error at the end of "rake spec", too:
>
> rake aborted!
> Command C:/Ruby/bin/ruby.exe -I"lib"
> "C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.3.0/bin/spec"
> "spec/addon/drb_spec.rb" "spec/core/application_spec.rb"
> "spec/core/build_spec.rb" "spec/core/cc_spec.rb"
> "spec/core/checks_spec.rb" "spec/core/common_spec.rb"
> "spec/core/compile_spec.rb" "spec/core/extension_spec.rb"
> "spec/core/generate_spec.rb" "spec/core/project_spec.rb"
> "spec/core/test_spec.rb" "spec/core/transport_spec.rb"
> "spec/core/util_spec.rb" "spec/groovy/bdd_spec.rb"
> "spec/groovy/compiler_spec.rb" "spec/ide/eclipse_spec.rb"
> "spec/ide/idea7x_spec.rb" "spec/java/ant_spec.rb"
> "spec/java/bdd_spec.rb" "spec/java/cobertura_spec.rb"
> "spec/java/commands_spec.rb" "spec/java/compiler_spec.rb"
> "spec/java/emma_spec.rb" "spec/java/java_spec.rb"
> "spec/java/packaging_spec.rb" "spec/java/tests_spec.rb"
> "spec/packaging/archive_spec.rb"
> "spec/packaging/artifact_namespace_spec.rb"
> "spec/packaging/artifact_spec.rb" "spec/packaging/packaging_spec.rb"
> "spec/scala/bdd_spec.rb" "spec/scala/compiler_spec.rb"
> "spec/scala/tests_spec.rb" "spec/version_requirement_spec.rb" --format
> specdoc --format failing_examples:failed --format
> html:_reports/specs.html --backtrace --colour failed
>
> Am I missing something required for generating test output?
>
Not sure. If you run with --trace, it gives a lot more info and should send
a backtrace.
>
>
> > Will, the problem with the gem versions are something you need to fix on
>
> I downloaded
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/dist/buildr-1.4.0.gem
> and installed it with "gem install buildr-1.4.0.gem". I have rspec
> (1.3.0, 1.2.9, 1.2.8) in "gem list rspec". What should I do to fix the
> problem? I also tried the file buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32.gem but got 59
> spec failures including the same rspec gem version errors.
>
The fix is to remove 1.3.0. What happens is that Buildr requires a few gems,
which lazily require rspec with version >0, and your system picks up the
latest version. When buildr gets around to dictate to start 1.2.9, rubygems
throws an error.
>
> I admit I don't understand the difference between the plain .gem and
> the -x86-mswin32.gem. I have been using the plain .gem because
> -x86-mswin32 doesn't match my ruby version string. Is that wrong?
>
You're not doing anything wrong. I'll open a new bug for that. The ruby
version of windows 7 changed, but I'm not sure if we need to change our
packaging much.
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com> wrote:
> Also, can you please open a bug with the output of the testing you made ?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-427
Also, I just realized I get an error at the end of "rake spec", too:
rake aborted!
Command C:/Ruby/bin/ruby.exe -I"lib"
"C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.3.0/bin/spec"
"spec/addon/drb_spec.rb" "spec/core/application_spec.rb"
"spec/core/build_spec.rb" "spec/core/cc_spec.rb"
"spec/core/checks_spec.rb" "spec/core/common_spec.rb"
"spec/core/compile_spec.rb" "spec/core/extension_spec.rb"
"spec/core/generate_spec.rb" "spec/core/project_spec.rb"
"spec/core/test_spec.rb" "spec/core/transport_spec.rb"
"spec/core/util_spec.rb" "spec/groovy/bdd_spec.rb"
"spec/groovy/compiler_spec.rb" "spec/ide/eclipse_spec.rb"
"spec/ide/idea7x_spec.rb" "spec/java/ant_spec.rb"
"spec/java/bdd_spec.rb" "spec/java/cobertura_spec.rb"
"spec/java/commands_spec.rb" "spec/java/compiler_spec.rb"
"spec/java/emma_spec.rb" "spec/java/java_spec.rb"
"spec/java/packaging_spec.rb" "spec/java/tests_spec.rb"
"spec/packaging/archive_spec.rb"
"spec/packaging/artifact_namespace_spec.rb"
"spec/packaging/artifact_spec.rb" "spec/packaging/packaging_spec.rb"
"spec/scala/bdd_spec.rb" "spec/scala/compiler_spec.rb"
"spec/scala/tests_spec.rb" "spec/version_requirement_spec.rb" --format
specdoc --format failing_examples:failed --format
html:_reports/specs.html --backtrace --colour failed
Am I missing something required for generating test output?
> Will, the problem with the gem versions are something you need to fix on
I downloaded http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/dist/buildr-1.4.0.gem
and installed it with "gem install buildr-1.4.0.gem". I have rspec
(1.3.0, 1.2.9, 1.2.8) in "gem list rspec". What should I do to fix the
problem? I also tried the file buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32.gem but got 59
spec failures including the same rspec gem version errors.
I admit I don't understand the difference between the plain .gem and
the -x86-mswin32.gem. I have been using the plain .gem because
-x86-mswin32 doesn't match my ruby version string. Is that wrong?
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
Also, can you please open a bug with the output of the testing you made ?
Thanks,
Antoine
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:33, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
> Will, the problem with the gem versions are something you need to fix on
> your machine, I think.
>
> How did you install Buildr ? Using the gem command ?
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:29, Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I pushed RC3 which fixes this bug. I will start a vote for this RC3 to
>> be
>> > our GA now.
>> > http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/
>>
>> Thanks. Sorry I didn't file a bug; I hadn't gotten around to resetting
>> my issues.apache.org password after the break-in they had earlier this
>> month.
>>
>> I ran buildr's tests w/ RC3 and got 52 failures on my Win7 install of
>> ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]. Here's the
>> output:
>>
>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26070/specs_buildr_1.4.0rc3.html.gz
>>
>> Many of the problems appear to be Windows path issues (especially the
>> URI specs). There are some failures under "Buildr::Application gems"
>> that look like more fixable gem version mismatch problems, though,
>> e.g.:
>>
>> "should return one entry for each gem specified in buildr.yaml
>> can't activate rspec (= 1.3.0, runtime) for [], already activated
>> rspec-1.2.9 for []"
>>
>> ...and it looks like calling File.utime throws a Permission denied
>> error every time.
>>
>>
>> On the upside, looks like you fixed the problems with not repackaging
>> when some files are changed, so thanks!
>>
>> -- Will
>>
>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
Will, the problem with the gem versions are something you need to fix on
your machine, I think.
How did you install Buildr ? Using the gem command ?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:29, Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
> wrote:
> > I pushed RC3 which fixes this bug. I will start a vote for this RC3 to be
> > our GA now.
> > http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/
>
> Thanks. Sorry I didn't file a bug; I hadn't gotten around to resetting
> my issues.apache.org password after the break-in they had earlier this
> month.
>
> I ran buildr's tests w/ RC3 and got 52 failures on my Win7 install of
> ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]. Here's the
> output:
>
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26070/specs_buildr_1.4.0rc3.html.gz
>
> Many of the problems appear to be Windows path issues (especially the
> URI specs). There are some failures under "Buildr::Application gems"
> that look like more fixable gem version mismatch problems, though,
> e.g.:
>
> "should return one entry for each gem specified in buildr.yaml
> can't activate rspec (= 1.3.0, runtime) for [], already activated
> rspec-1.2.9 for []"
>
> ...and it looks like calling File.utime throws a Permission denied
> error every time.
>
>
> On the upside, looks like you fixed the problems with not repackaging
> when some files are changed, so thanks!
>
> -- Will
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com> wrote:
> I pushed RC3 which fixes this bug. I will start a vote for this RC3 to be
> our GA now.
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/
Thanks. Sorry I didn't file a bug; I hadn't gotten around to resetting
my issues.apache.org password after the break-in they had earlier this
month.
I ran buildr's tests w/ RC3 and got 52 failures on my Win7 install of
ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]. Here's the
output:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26070/specs_buildr_1.4.0rc3.html.gz
Many of the problems appear to be Windows path issues (especially the
URI specs). There are some failures under "Buildr::Application gems"
that look like more fixable gem version mismatch problems, though,
e.g.:
"should return one entry for each gem specified in buildr.yaml
can't activate rspec (= 1.3.0, runtime) for [], already activated
rspec-1.2.9 for []"
...and it looks like calling File.utime throws a Permission denied
error every time.
On the upside, looks like you fixed the problems with not repackaging
when some files are changed, so thanks!
-- Will
RE: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Klaas Prause <kl...@blau.de>.
Hi,
if you are using ivy4r with the new buildr release you need to update to ivy4r 0.10.5 it is already published in gemcutter.org.
Regards Klaas
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Schröder [mailto:ps@blau.de]
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:46 PM
To: users@buildr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
we had some problems with circular dependencies on the ivy4r plugin but now everything works.
Am 24.04.2010 um 19:05 schrieb Antoine Toulme:
> I pushed RC3 which fixes this bug. I will start a vote for this RC3 to be
> our GA now.
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 15:51, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
>
>> Will, please file a bug and we will move to the latest json_pure gem.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 15:48, Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>>>
>>> I have:
>>>
>>> C:\buildr -V
>>> C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:230:in `activate': can't
>>> activate json_pure (= 1.2.0, runtime) for ["buildr-1.4.0"], already
>>> activated json_pure-1.2.3 for ["gemcutter-0.5.0"] (Gem::LoadError)
>>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:246:in `activate'
>>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `each'
>>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `activate'
>>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:1056:in `gem'
>>> from C:/Ruby/bin/buildr:18
>>>
>>> after installing
>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/dist/buildr-1.4.0.gem
>>> on ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Peter Schröder <ps...@blau.de>.
we had some problems with circular dependencies on the ivy4r plugin but now everything works.
Am 24.04.2010 um 19:05 schrieb Antoine Toulme:
> I pushed RC3 which fixes this bug. I will start a vote for this RC3 to be
> our GA now.
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 15:51, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
>
>> Will, please file a bug and we will move to the latest json_pure gem.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 15:48, Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>>>
>>> I have:
>>>
>>> C:\buildr -V
>>> C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:230:in `activate': can't
>>> activate json_pure (= 1.2.0, runtime) for ["buildr-1.4.0"], already
>>> activated json_pure-1.2.3 for ["gemcutter-0.5.0"] (Gem::LoadError)
>>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:246:in `activate'
>>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `each'
>>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `activate'
>>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:1056:in `gem'
>>> from C:/Ruby/bin/buildr:18
>>>
>>> after installing
>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/dist/buildr-1.4.0.gem
>>> on ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]
>>>
>>
>>
AW: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Peter Schröder <ps...@blau.de>.
i will try running rc_3 on our integration server on monday and give feedback.
I pushed RC3 which fixes this bug. I will start a vote for this RC3 to be
our GA now.
http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 15:51, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
> Will, please file a bug and we will move to the latest json_pure gem.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Antoine
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 15:48, Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
>> wrote:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>>
>> I have:
>>
>> C:\buildr -V
>> C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:230:in `activate': can't
>> activate json_pure (= 1.2.0, runtime) for ["buildr-1.4.0"], already
>> activated json_pure-1.2.3 for ["gemcutter-0.5.0"] (Gem::LoadError)
>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:246:in `activate'
>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `each'
>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `activate'
>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:1056:in `gem'
>> from C:/Ruby/bin/buildr:18
>>
>> after installing
>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/dist/buildr-1.4.0.gem
>> on ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]
>>
>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
I pushed RC3 which fixes this bug. I will start a vote for this RC3 to be
our GA now.
http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 15:51, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
> Will, please file a bug and we will move to the latest json_pure gem.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Antoine
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 15:48, Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
>> wrote:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>>
>> I have:
>>
>> C:\buildr -V
>> C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:230:in `activate': can't
>> activate json_pure (= 1.2.0, runtime) for ["buildr-1.4.0"], already
>> activated json_pure-1.2.3 for ["gemcutter-0.5.0"] (Gem::LoadError)
>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:246:in `activate'
>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `each'
>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `activate'
>> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:1056:in `gem'
>> from C:/Ruby/bin/buildr:18
>>
>> after installing
>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/dist/buildr-1.4.0.gem
>> on ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]
>>
>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
Will, please file a bug and we will move to the latest json_pure gem.
Thanks!
Antoine
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 15:48, Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
> wrote:
> > http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>
> I have:
>
> C:\buildr -V
> C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:230:in `activate': can't
> activate json_pure (= 1.2.0, runtime) for ["buildr-1.4.0"], already
> activated json_pure-1.2.3 for ["gemcutter-0.5.0"] (Gem::LoadError)
> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:246:in `activate'
> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `each'
> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `activate'
> from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:1056:in `gem'
> from C:/Ruby/bin/buildr:18
>
> after installing
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/dist/buildr-1.4.0.gem
> on ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Will Rogers <wj...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com> wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
I have:
C:\buildr -V
C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:230:in `activate': can't
activate json_pure (= 1.2.0, runtime) for ["buildr-1.4.0"], already
activated json_pure-1.2.3 for ["gemcutter-0.5.0"] (Gem::LoadError)
from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:246:in `activate'
from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `each'
from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:245:in `activate'
from C:/Ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:1056:in `gem'
from C:/Ruby/bin/buildr:18
after installing
http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/dist/buildr-1.4.0.gem
on ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@realityforge.org>.
>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might need to
>> change packaging for that new OS.
>
> It would be good to know if the release actually works on Windows.
It does not under the latest 64bit Windows with jruby 1.3.1 or jruby
1.5. Unfortunately I don't have access to a Windows box to track it
down further.
> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and finding their
> Buildr install broken.
Whats even more annoying is that installing buildr 1.4 breaks buildr
1.3.6 as well. IIRC it installed an extra gem (rspec?) that had to be
removed to get buildr 1.3.6 working again.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>.
If nobody else beats me to it, I can test on Windows 7 tonight. Will
report tomorrow.
alex
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
> I don't have a windows 7 machine handy for testing so I'm kinda stuck.
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:56, Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
>>
>>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might need to
>>> change packaging for that new OS.
>>>
>>
>> It would be good to know if the release actually works on Windows.
>>
>> Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
>>
>>
>> I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance release
>>> with
>>> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
>>>
>>
>> Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
>>
>> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and finding their
>> Buildr install broken.
>>
>> alex
>>
>>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>.
I'm getting 56 failures now, which I would categorize as,
1) File.utime() permissions issues: I'm getting a lot of "Permission
Denied' when doing File.utime(). This may be because the temp directory
doesn't have the right permissions.
2) Windows path issues. I'm seeing similar errors to the ones below.
Invalid argument - /C:
c:/ruby-1.8.7/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:243:in `mkdir'
or
Looking for file:///C:/ruby-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32/tmp/source
and can't find it.
C:/ruby-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32/lib/buildr/core/transports.rb:517:in
`read'
3) Other permissions issues,
expected "100666" to match /644$/
c:/ruby-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/expectations/fail_with.rb:41:in
`fail_with'
should preserve file permissions
expected: 511,
got: 420 (using ==)
c:/ruby-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/expectations/fail_with.rb:41:in
`fail_with' c
4) Only a few others which may / may not be due to the above. (One failure
due to SCALA_HOME, a few failures in Eclipse task)
I'll get started on fixing these today.
alex
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alex, could you try running the specs, see if everything works? It's good
> to hear that Buildr installs though, it's farther than I got. :-)
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On May 11, 2010, at 5:32 PM, "Antoine Toulme" <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
> wrote:
>
> So we're good to go, or do I have to buy a Windows 7 machine to test this
>> out ?
>>
>> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 07:58, Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> For what it's worth, 1.4.0 RC3 installed cleanly on my Windows 7 machine:
>>>
>>> C:\Users\Owner\Downloads>gem install buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32.gem
>>> **************************************************
>>>
>>> Thank you for installing rspec-1.2.9
>>>
>>> Please be sure to read History.rdoc and Upgrade.rdoc
>>> for useful information about this release.
>>>
>>> **************************************************
>>> To get started run buildr --help
>>> Successfully installed json_pure-1.4.0
>>> Successfully installed rubyforge-2.0.3
>>> Successfully installed rspec-1.2.9
>>> Successfully installed buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32
>>> 4 gems installed
>>> Installing ri documentation for json_pure-1.4.0...
>>> Installing ri documentation for rubyforge-2.0.3...
>>> Installing ri documentation for rspec-1.2.9...
>>> Installing ri documentation for buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32...
>>> Installing RDoc documentation for json_pure-1.4.0...
>>> Installing RDoc documentation for rubyforge-2.0.3...
>>> Installing RDoc documentation for rspec-1.2.9...
>>> Could not find main page README.rdoc
>>> Could not find main page README.rdoc
>>> Could not find main page README.rdoc
>>> Could not find main page README.rdoc
>>> Installing RDoc documentation for buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32...
>>>
>>> C:\Users\Owner\Downloads>
>>>
>>> and I was able to 'sucessfully' build the Apache Ode trunk... up to a
>>> point
>>> where it failed with a compile error.
>>>
>>> alex
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisvert@gmail.com
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Haven't gotten to it yet; my Windows machine suffered a power-supply
>>>> blowout yesterday when I turned it on :(
>>>>
>>>> alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My testing didn't get very far, since gem was unable to build the
>>>>> dependencies when I ran `rake setup` under MRI. I'm guessing either
>>>>> our
>>>>> gemspec is wrong, or Gem itself has a bug w.r.t. Windows 7 x86_64. I
>>>>>
>>>> had
>>>
>>>> other problems with JRuby (not Buildr-related) and wasn't able to do any
>>>>> meaningful testing in that area.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully Alex had more luck. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Antoine Toulme <
>>>>> antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you get anything from the testing ? Or should I consider getting a
>>>>>>
>>>>> VM
>>>>>
>>>>>> (please, no, please!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:04, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have Windows 7, so I'll try to do some quick testing tonight.
>>>>>>> Hopefully the fix is something reasonably straightforward; it would
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> be
>>>
>>>> disappointing if windows 7 broke Buildr in more fundamental ways.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 4, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't have a windows 7 machine handy for testing so I'm kinda
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> stuck.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:56, Alex Boisvert
>>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might
>>>>>>>>>> need to
>>>>>>>>>> change packaging for that new OS.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It would be good to know if the release actually works on
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Windows.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> finding
>>>
>>>> their
>>>>>>>>> Buildr install broken.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> alex
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>.
Alex, could you try running the specs, see if everything works? It's
good to hear that Buildr installs though, it's farther than I got. :-)
Daniel
On May 11, 2010, at 5:32 PM, "Antoine Toulme" <antoine@lunar-
ocean.com> wrote:
> So we're good to go, or do I have to buy a Windows 7 machine to test
> this
> out ?
>
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 07:58, Alex Boisvert
> <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, 1.4.0 RC3 installed cleanly on my Windows 7
>> machine:
>>
>> C:\Users\Owner\Downloads>gem install buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32.gem
>> **************************************************
>>
>> Thank you for installing rspec-1.2.9
>>
>> Please be sure to read History.rdoc and Upgrade.rdoc
>> for useful information about this release.
>>
>> **************************************************
>> To get started run buildr --help
>> Successfully installed json_pure-1.4.0
>> Successfully installed rubyforge-2.0.3
>> Successfully installed rspec-1.2.9
>> Successfully installed buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32
>> 4 gems installed
>> Installing ri documentation for json_pure-1.4.0...
>> Installing ri documentation for rubyforge-2.0.3...
>> Installing ri documentation for rspec-1.2.9...
>> Installing ri documentation for buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32...
>> Installing RDoc documentation for json_pure-1.4.0...
>> Installing RDoc documentation for rubyforge-2.0.3...
>> Installing RDoc documentation for rspec-1.2.9...
>> Could not find main page README.rdoc
>> Could not find main page README.rdoc
>> Could not find main page README.rdoc
>> Could not find main page README.rdoc
>> Installing RDoc documentation for buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32...
>>
>> C:\Users\Owner\Downloads>
>>
>> and I was able to 'sucessfully' build the Apache Ode trunk... up to
>> a point
>> where it failed with a compile error.
>>
>> alex
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Alex Boisvert
>> <alex.boisvert@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> Haven't gotten to it yet; my Windows machine suffered a power-
>>> supply
>>> blowout yesterday when I turned it on :(
>>>
>>> alex
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> My testing didn't get very far, since gem was unable to build the
>>>> dependencies when I ran `rake setup` under MRI. I'm guessing
>>>> either our
>>>> gemspec is wrong, or Gem itself has a bug w.r.t. Windows 7
>>>> x86_64. I
>> had
>>>> other problems with JRuby (not Buildr-related) and wasn't able to
>>>> do any
>>>> meaningful testing in that area.
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully Alex had more luck. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Did you get anything from the testing ? Or should I consider
>>>>> getting a
>>>> VM
>>>>> (please, no, please!)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:04, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have Windows 7, so I'll try to do some quick testing tonight.
>>>>>> Hopefully the fix is something reasonably straightforward; it
>>>>>> would
>> be
>>>>>> disappointing if windows 7 broke Buildr in more fundamental ways.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 4, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't have a windows 7 machine handy for testing so I'm kinda
>>>> stuck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:56, Alex Boisvert
>>>>>>> <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <
>>>>> antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might
>>>>>>>>> need to
>>>>>>>>> change packaging for that new OS.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would be good to know if the release actually works on
>> Windows.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and
>> finding
>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>> Buildr install broken.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
So we're good to go, or do I have to buy a Windows 7 machine to test this
out ?
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 07:58, Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For what it's worth, 1.4.0 RC3 installed cleanly on my Windows 7 machine:
>
> C:\Users\Owner\Downloads>gem install buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32.gem
> **************************************************
>
> Thank you for installing rspec-1.2.9
>
> Please be sure to read History.rdoc and Upgrade.rdoc
> for useful information about this release.
>
> **************************************************
> To get started run buildr --help
> Successfully installed json_pure-1.4.0
> Successfully installed rubyforge-2.0.3
> Successfully installed rspec-1.2.9
> Successfully installed buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32
> 4 gems installed
> Installing ri documentation for json_pure-1.4.0...
> Installing ri documentation for rubyforge-2.0.3...
> Installing ri documentation for rspec-1.2.9...
> Installing ri documentation for buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32...
> Installing RDoc documentation for json_pure-1.4.0...
> Installing RDoc documentation for rubyforge-2.0.3...
> Installing RDoc documentation for rspec-1.2.9...
> Could not find main page README.rdoc
> Could not find main page README.rdoc
> Could not find main page README.rdoc
> Could not find main page README.rdoc
> Installing RDoc documentation for buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32...
>
> C:\Users\Owner\Downloads>
>
> and I was able to 'sucessfully' build the Apache Ode trunk... up to a point
> where it failed with a compile error.
>
> alex
>
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisvert@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Haven't gotten to it yet; my Windows machine suffered a power-supply
> > blowout yesterday when I turned it on :(
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> My testing didn't get very far, since gem was unable to build the
> >> dependencies when I ran `rake setup` under MRI. I'm guessing either our
> >> gemspec is wrong, or Gem itself has a bug w.r.t. Windows 7 x86_64. I
> had
> >> other problems with JRuby (not Buildr-related) and wasn't able to do any
> >> meaningful testing in that area.
> >>
> >> Hopefully Alex had more luck. :-)
> >>
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Did you get anything from the testing ? Or should I consider getting a
> >> VM
> >> > (please, no, please!)
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:04, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I have Windows 7, so I'll try to do some quick testing tonight.
> >> > > Hopefully the fix is something reasonably straightforward; it would
> be
> >> > > disappointing if windows 7 broke Buildr in more fundamental ways.
> >> > >
> >> > > Daniel
> >> > >
> >> > > On May 4, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I don't have a windows 7 machine handy for testing so I'm kinda
> >> stuck.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:56, Alex Boisvert
> >> > > > <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <
> >> > antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> >> > > >> >wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might
> >> > > >>> need to
> >> > > >>> change packaging for that new OS.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> It would be good to know if the release actually works on
> Windows.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance
> >> > > >> release
> >> > > >>> with
> >> > > >>> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and
> finding
> >> > > >> their
> >> > > >> Buildr install broken.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> alex
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>.
For what it's worth, 1.4.0 RC3 installed cleanly on my Windows 7 machine:
C:\Users\Owner\Downloads>gem install buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32.gem
**************************************************
Thank you for installing rspec-1.2.9
Please be sure to read History.rdoc and Upgrade.rdoc
for useful information about this release.
**************************************************
To get started run buildr --help
Successfully installed json_pure-1.4.0
Successfully installed rubyforge-2.0.3
Successfully installed rspec-1.2.9
Successfully installed buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32
4 gems installed
Installing ri documentation for json_pure-1.4.0...
Installing ri documentation for rubyforge-2.0.3...
Installing ri documentation for rspec-1.2.9...
Installing ri documentation for buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32...
Installing RDoc documentation for json_pure-1.4.0...
Installing RDoc documentation for rubyforge-2.0.3...
Installing RDoc documentation for rspec-1.2.9...
Could not find main page README.rdoc
Could not find main page README.rdoc
Could not find main page README.rdoc
Could not find main page README.rdoc
Installing RDoc documentation for buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32...
C:\Users\Owner\Downloads>
and I was able to 'sucessfully' build the Apache Ode trunk... up to a point
where it failed with a compile error.
alex
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Haven't gotten to it yet; my Windows machine suffered a power-supply
> blowout yesterday when I turned it on :(
>
> alex
>
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> My testing didn't get very far, since gem was unable to build the
>> dependencies when I ran `rake setup` under MRI. I'm guessing either our
>> gemspec is wrong, or Gem itself has a bug w.r.t. Windows 7 x86_64. I had
>> other problems with JRuby (not Buildr-related) and wasn't able to do any
>> meaningful testing in that area.
>>
>> Hopefully Alex had more luck. :-)
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Did you get anything from the testing ? Or should I consider getting a
>> VM
>> > (please, no, please!)
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:04, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I have Windows 7, so I'll try to do some quick testing tonight.
>> > > Hopefully the fix is something reasonably straightforward; it would be
>> > > disappointing if windows 7 broke Buildr in more fundamental ways.
>> > >
>> > > Daniel
>> > >
>> > > On May 4, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I don't have a windows 7 machine handy for testing so I'm kinda
>> stuck.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:56, Alex Boisvert
>> > > > <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <
>> > antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>> > > >> >wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might
>> > > >>> need to
>> > > >>> change packaging for that new OS.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> It would be good to know if the release actually works on Windows.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance
>> > > >> release
>> > > >>> with
>> > > >>> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and finding
>> > > >> their
>> > > >> Buildr install broken.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> alex
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>.
Haven't gotten to it yet; my Windows machine suffered a power-supply
blowout yesterday when I turned it on :(
alex
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My testing didn't get very far, since gem was unable to build the
> dependencies when I ran `rake setup` under MRI. I'm guessing either our
> gemspec is wrong, or Gem itself has a bug w.r.t. Windows 7 x86_64. I had
> other problems with JRuby (not Buildr-related) and wasn't able to do any
> meaningful testing in that area.
>
> Hopefully Alex had more luck. :-)
>
> Daniel
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Did you get anything from the testing ? Or should I consider getting a VM
> > (please, no, please!)
> >
> > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:04, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I have Windows 7, so I'll try to do some quick testing tonight.
> > > Hopefully the fix is something reasonably straightforward; it would be
> > > disappointing if windows 7 broke Buildr in more fundamental ways.
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > On May 4, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't have a windows 7 machine handy for testing so I'm kinda
> stuck.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:56, Alex Boisvert
> > > > <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <
> > antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> > > >> >wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might
> > > >>> need to
> > > >>> change packaging for that new OS.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> It would be good to know if the release actually works on Windows.
> > > >>
> > > >> Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance
> > > >> release
> > > >>> with
> > > >>> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
> > > >>
> > > >> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and finding
> > > >> their
> > > >> Buildr install broken.
> > > >>
> > > >> alex
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>.
My testing didn't get very far, since gem was unable to build the
dependencies when I ran `rake setup` under MRI. I'm guessing either our
gemspec is wrong, or Gem itself has a bug w.r.t. Windows 7 x86_64. I had
other problems with JRuby (not Buildr-related) and wasn't able to do any
meaningful testing in that area.
Hopefully Alex had more luck. :-)
Daniel
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
> Did you get anything from the testing ? Or should I consider getting a VM
> (please, no, please!)
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:04, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have Windows 7, so I'll try to do some quick testing tonight.
> > Hopefully the fix is something reasonably straightforward; it would be
> > disappointing if windows 7 broke Buildr in more fundamental ways.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > On May 4, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I don't have a windows 7 machine handy for testing so I'm kinda stuck.
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:56, Alex Boisvert
> > > <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <
> antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might
> > >>> need to
> > >>> change packaging for that new OS.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> It would be good to know if the release actually works on Windows.
> > >>
> > >> Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance
> > >> release
> > >>> with
> > >>> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
> > >>
> > >> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and finding
> > >> their
> > >> Buildr install broken.
> > >>
> > >> alex
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
Did you get anything from the testing ? Or should I consider getting a VM
(please, no, please!)
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:04, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have Windows 7, so I'll try to do some quick testing tonight.
> Hopefully the fix is something reasonably straightforward; it would be
> disappointing if windows 7 broke Buildr in more fundamental ways.
>
> Daniel
>
> On May 4, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't have a windows 7 machine handy for testing so I'm kinda stuck.
> >
> > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:56, Alex Boisvert
> > <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might
> >>> need to
> >>> change packaging for that new OS.
> >>>
> >>
> >> It would be good to know if the release actually works on Windows.
> >>
> >> Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
> >>
> >>
> >> I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance
> >> release
> >>> with
> >>> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
> >>
> >> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and finding
> >> their
> >> Buildr install broken.
> >>
> >> alex
> >>
> >>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>.
I have Windows 7, so I'll try to do some quick testing tonight.
Hopefully the fix is something reasonably straightforward; it would be
disappointing if windows 7 broke Buildr in more fundamental ways.
Daniel
On May 4, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>
wrote:
> I don't have a windows 7 machine handy for testing so I'm kinda stuck.
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:56, Alex Boisvert
> <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might
>>> need to
>>> change packaging for that new OS.
>>>
>>
>> It would be good to know if the release actually works on Windows.
>>
>> Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
>>
>>
>> I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance
>> release
>>> with
>>> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
>>>
>>
>> Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
>>
>> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and finding
>> their
>> Buildr install broken.
>>
>> alex
>>
>>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
I don't have a windows 7 machine handy for testing so I'm kinda stuck.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:56, Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
>
>> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might need to
>> change packaging for that new OS.
>>
>
> It would be good to know if the release actually works on Windows.
>
> Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
>
>
> I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance release
>> with
>> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
>>
>
> Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
>
> I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and finding their
> Buildr install broken.
>
> alex
>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
> We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might need to
> change packaging for that new OS.
>
It would be good to know if the release actually works on Windows.
Are the spec failures false negatives, or blocking issues?
I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance release with
> complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
>
Same here, assuming there are no real blockers on Windows.
I wouldn't want people running "gem update" on Windows and finding their
Buildr install broken.
alex
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
We have spec failures on Windows 7, and it looks like we might need to
change packaging for that new OS.
I would be ok with releasing now but we will need a maintenance release with
complete windows 7 support and JRuby 1.5 quickly.
There have been so far:
+1 : 3,
+0 : 0
-1 : 0
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 14:14, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's the current status of the release effort? (I'm a bit foggy on
> what's
> going on) One of the reasons I ask is I'm doing the Profict presentation
> on
> Friday demoing several features from 1.4, and it would be a lot more
> compelling if 1.4 was actually out. :-)
>
> Daniel
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> >wrote:
>
> > http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/>
> >
> > Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Antoine
> >
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>.
What's the current status of the release effort? (I'm a bit foggy on what's
going on) One of the reasons I ask is I'm doing the Profict presentation on
Friday demoing several features from 1.4, and it would be a lot more
compelling if 1.4 was actually out. :-)
Daniel
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/>
>
> Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoine
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
I understand the pain. I don't know who has access to Gemcutter (Assaf ?).
My plan this week-end is to release 1.4 final and figure that out.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 13:17, Charles Oliver Nutter <he...@headius.com>wrote:
> Is it possible to push out some "pre" gems for the RCs? You'd just
> need the gemspec version to be 1.4.0.rc2 and it would only be
> installable using gem install --pre then. It would make it easier on
> those of us playing with it on JRuby 1.5 :)
>
> - Charlie
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Adam Young <ay...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I've confirmed that for candlepin, both the 1.4 version of buildr
> produces
> > identical output as the 1.3 version .
> >
> > On 04/22/2010 07:47 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> >>
> >> Thx!
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 16:45, Adam Young<ay...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Seems to run correctly for candlepin. I'll do a deeper dive over the
> >>> weekend.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 04/22/2010 07:37 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I realize everyone does gem, but it would be helpful if there were
> >>>> building instructions in the README for the tar.gz crowd.
> >>>>
> >>>> I did
> >>>> rake
> >>>> and it didn't work.
> >>>>
> >>>> Took me a while to find
> >>>>
> >>>> rake setup install
> >>>>
> >>>> from
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/site/contributing.html#edge
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 04/22/2010 06:27 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Antoine
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Charles Oliver Nutter <he...@headius.com>.
Is it possible to push out some "pre" gems for the RCs? You'd just
need the gemspec version to be 1.4.0.rc2 and it would only be
installable using gem install --pre then. It would make it easier on
those of us playing with it on JRuby 1.5 :)
- Charlie
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Adam Young <ay...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I've confirmed that for candlepin, both the 1.4 version of buildr produces
> identical output as the 1.3 version .
>
> On 04/22/2010 07:47 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>>
>> Thx!
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 16:45, Adam Young<ay...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Seems to run correctly for candlepin. I'll do a deeper dive over the
>>> weekend.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/22/2010 07:37 PM, Adam Young wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I realize everyone does gem, but it would be helpful if there were
>>>> building instructions in the README for the tar.gz crowd.
>>>>
>>>> I did
>>>> rake
>>>> and it didn't work.
>>>>
>>>> Took me a while to find
>>>>
>>>> rake setup install
>>>>
>>>> from
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/site/contributing.html#edge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 04/22/2010 06:27 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>>>>>
>>>>> Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Antoine
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Adam Young <ay...@redhat.com>.
I've confirmed that for candlepin, both the 1.4 version of buildr
produces identical output as the 1.3 version .
On 04/22/2010 07:47 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Thx!
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 16:45, Adam Young<ay...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Seems to run correctly for candlepin. I'll do a deeper dive over the
>> weekend.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/22/2010 07:37 PM, Adam Young wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I realize everyone does gem, but it would be helpful if there were
>>> building instructions in the README for the tar.gz crowd.
>>>
>>> I did
>>> rake
>>> and it didn't work.
>>>
>>> Took me a while to find
>>>
>>> rake setup install
>>>
>>> from
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/site/contributing.html#edge
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/22/2010 06:27 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>>>>
>>>> Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Antoine
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
Thx!
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 16:45, Adam Young <ay...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Seems to run correctly for candlepin. I'll do a deeper dive over the
> weekend.
>
>
>
>
> On 04/22/2010 07:37 PM, Adam Young wrote:
>
>> I realize everyone does gem, but it would be helpful if there were
>> building instructions in the README for the tar.gz crowd.
>>
>> I did
>> rake
>> and it didn't work.
>>
>> Took me a while to find
>>
>> rake setup install
>>
>> from
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/site/contributing.html#edge
>>
>>
>> On 04/22/2010 06:27 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>>>
>>> Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Adam Young <ay...@redhat.com>.
Seems to run correctly for candlepin. I'll do a deeper dive over the
weekend.
On 04/22/2010 07:37 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> I realize everyone does gem, but it would be helpful if there were
> building instructions in the README for the tar.gz crowd.
>
> I did
> rake
> and it didn't work.
>
> Took me a while to find
>
> rake setup install
>
> from
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/site/contributing.html#edge
>
>
>
> On 04/22/2010 06:27 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>>
>> Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Adam Young <ay...@redhat.com>.
I'm holding off, as I've installed a custom gem on this machine, and
figured that I'd get the gem when I did the gem2rpm.
On 04/22/2010 07:46 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Adam, you can get the gem from the dist folder, install it locally by doing
> gem install name_of_gem.gem
>
> That's pretty equivalent to the rake approach - which I never used, thanks
> for the tip :)
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 16:37, Adam Young<ay...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I realize everyone does gem, but it would be helpful if there were building
>> instructions in the README for the tar.gz crowd.
>>
>> I did
>> rake
>> and it didn't work.
>>
>> Took me a while to find
>>
>> rake setup install
>>
>> from
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/site/contributing.html#edge
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/22/2010 06:27 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>>
>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>>>
>>> Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
Adam, you can get the gem from the dist folder, install it locally by doing
gem install name_of_gem.gem
That's pretty equivalent to the rake approach - which I never used, thanks
for the tip :)
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 16:37, Adam Young <ay...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I realize everyone does gem, but it would be helpful if there were building
> instructions in the README for the tar.gz crowd.
>
> I did
> rake
> and it didn't work.
>
> Took me a while to find
>
> rake setup install
>
> from
>
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/site/contributing.html#edge
>
>
>
> On 04/22/2010 06:27 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>>
>> Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Posted by Adam Young <ay...@redhat.com>.
I realize everyone does gem, but it would be helpful if there were
building instructions in the README for the tar.gz crowd.
I did
rake
and it didn't work.
Took me a while to find
rake setup install
from
http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/site/contributing.html#edge
On 04/22/2010 06:27 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC2/
>
> Please test it thoroughly so that we can do the GA ASAP!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoine
>
>