Re: [PR] Add loading of ET_DYN shared object test to sotest [nuttx-apps]

["acassis (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>]

acassis commented on PR #2026:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2026#issuecomment-1852030002

   > Also, as far as I can tell the following archs can support sotest (i.e. it's a selectable Kconfig option):
   > 
   >     1. ./boards/xtensa/esp32/esp32-devkitc/configs/sotest/defconfig
   > 
   >     2. ./boards/xtensa/esp32s2/esp32s2-saola-1/configs/sotest/defconfig
   > 
   >     3. ./boards/risc-v/esp32c3/esp32c3-devkit/configs/sotest/defconfig
   > 
   >     4. ./boards/risc-v/c906/smartl-c906/configs/sotest/defconfig
   > 
   >     5. ./boards/sim/sim/sim/configs/sotest32/defconfig
   > 
   >     6. ./boards/sim/sim/sim/configs/sotest/defconfig
   > 
   >     7. ./boards/arm64/qemu/qemu-armv8a/configs/sotest/defconfig
   > 
   > 
   > Should I be specifying the `SHMODULEFLAGS` in the corresponding `Make.defs` file for each of those "boards" or in the arch generic files such as `./arch/risc-v/src/common/Toolchain.defs`?
   > 
   > @xiaoxiang781216
   
   @Donny9 @xiaoxiang781216 what do you think? Since SHMODULEFLAGS is defined to sim "board" I think it also will be needed for other arch's boards.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org