Re: [Ftpserver] Comments on the new code

[Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>]

Paul Hammant wrote:
> 
> OK, if we're keen about Dependency Injection, we'd need to change a  
> lot.  The basic FtpConfig component should have little knowledge of  
> UserManager (and others), and no coupling to it...

If we do aim for a DI/IoC approach (and I think we should), should we 
choose a DI implementation (Pico, Spring...) that we ship as the default 
implementation? Or, should we try to implement a specialized runtime 
ourselves? I would certainly go for the former option and would favour 
Spring but I'm guessing that Paul won't agree on this choice :-).

/niklas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org