You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Allen Evans (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/09/09 17:50:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (SUREFIRE-1694) Surefire silently skips tests in
presence of transitive dependency
Allen Evans created SUREFIRE-1694:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Surefire silently skips tests in presence of transitive dependency
Key: SUREFIRE-1694
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1694
Project: Maven Surefire
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Maven Surefire Plugin
Affects Versions: 2.22.2
Reporter: Allen Evans
In a multi-module project, one module "functional-tests" contains a test suite that tests the whole application.
Usually, running mvn verify will run the tests in this module.
{code:java}
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.22.0:test (default-test) @ functional-tests ---
[WARNING] file.encoding cannot be set as system property, use <argLine>-Dfile.encoding=...</argLine> instead
[INFO]
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------
...{code}
Recently, I added a dependency (io.vertx:vertx-config-git) to the pom.xml of one of my project's modules "config", and now mvn verify breezes through the functional-tests module without running any of the tests, and without logging anything noteworthy (even with the -X flag)
{code:java}
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.22.0:test (default-test) @ functional-tests ---
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:2.8:copy-dependencies (copy-dependencies) @ functional-tests ---
...{code}
After adding a dependency:exclusion tag to the pom.xml of the "config" module that excludes a particular transitive dependency from vertx-config-git (org.eclipse.jgit:org.eclipse.jgit), the tests work as before. Obviously this is not a solution, but it seems to narrow down the problem.
Is it likely that my issue is caused by the presence of org.eclipse.jgit in my dependency tree? This seems counterintuitive.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)