You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@turbine.apache.org by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> on 2002/03/18 19:13:47 UTC
Version Names
Hi,
As things are now decoupled how do we want to version Torque and
Fulcrum. There are some version numbers on their currently but I think
it's been fairly arbitrary.
Should Torque and Fulcrum actually be 2.2 or 3.0 or something different
all together. I would like to tag all the repositories with what we
decide before releasing the 2.2 beta 1.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Version Names
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 14:41, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
>
> > As things are now decoupled how do we want to version Torque and
> > Fulcrum. There are some version numbers on their currently but I think
> > it's been fairly arbitrary.
> >
> > Should Torque and Fulcrum actually be 2.2 or 3.0 or something different
> > all together. I would like to tag all the repositories with what we
> > decide before releasing the 2.2 beta 1.
>
> The decoupled components should be versioned separately from Turbine
> itself. I would like to start the versioning for the decoupled
> components at 3.0, as that's approximately where they were broken out
> from Turbine proper.
All right. 3.0 it is. Probably the best place to start, I'm not
particularly fussy I would just like to prevent confusion so the 3.0
route is probably the best.
> - Dan
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Version Names
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
> As things are now decoupled how do we want to version Torque and
> Fulcrum. There are some version numbers on their currently but I think
> it's been fairly arbitrary.
>
> Should Torque and Fulcrum actually be 2.2 or 3.0 or something different
> all together. I would like to tag all the repositories with what we
> decide before releasing the 2.2 beta 1.
The decoupled components should be versioned separately from Turbine
itself. I would like to start the versioning for the decoupled
components at 3.0, as that's approximately where they were broken out
from Turbine proper.
- Dan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Version Names
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 13:21, James Taylor wrote:
> I think continuing the version numbers from the monolithic turbine is a
> good idea, thus torque-2.2 and 3.0, fulcrum-2.2 and 3.0. Seems to have
> the least potential for confusion.
So you want to call the decoupled versions 3.0, yes?
> -- jt
>
> On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 13:13, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As things are now decoupled how do we want to version Torque and
> > Fulcrum. There are some version numbers on their currently but I think
> > it's been fairly arbitrary.
> >
> > Should Torque and Fulcrum actually be 2.2 or 3.0 or something different
> > all together. I would like to tag all the repositories with what we
> > decide before releasing the 2.2 beta 1.
> >
> > --
> > jvz.
> >
> > Jason van Zyl
> > jvanzyl@apache.org
> >
> > http://tambora.zenplex.org
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Version Names
Posted by James Taylor <jt...@4lane.com>.
I think continuing the version numbers from the monolithic turbine is a
good idea, thus torque-2.2 and 3.0, fulcrum-2.2 and 3.0. Seems to have
the least potential for confusion.
-- jt
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 13:13, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As things are now decoupled how do we want to version Torque and
> Fulcrum. There are some version numbers on their currently but I think
> it's been fairly arbitrary.
>
> Should Torque and Fulcrum actually be 2.2 or 3.0 or something different
> all together. I would like to tag all the repositories with what we
> decide before releasing the 2.2 beta 1.
>
> --
> jvz.
>
> Jason van Zyl
> jvanzyl@apache.org
>
> http://tambora.zenplex.org
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>