You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@knox.apache.org by Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com> on 2013/03/28 21:17:24 UTC
[VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Hi Everyone,
I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
wanting a release at this time are:
1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we try it.
2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
[ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
Kevin.
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com>.
Lets consider the thread terminated :-)
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 29, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> OK. I see. The [DISCUSS] is enough to create the RC and the [VOTE] is for approval of the RC. I assumed we were voting to ensure that everyone agreed we should even create an RC. So I'll get busy and create the RC and then call for a vote.
>
> What is the proper way to terminate this thread. I'm assuming it will take me a few days to properly create the RC.
>
> On 3/29/13 12:04 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>> Hey Kevin, you basically need two steps. One a DISCUSS thread where
>> you propose making a release, and (assuming folks agree) another a
>> VOTE thread on a staged RC candidate. People (PPMC & IPMC) should try
>> out the release and do the various RC checks, and then vote. If the
>> vote passes make the release official..
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Mar 29, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I still don't understand. I thought I...
>>>
>>> 1. Started a [DISCUSS] thread on Wednesday.
>>> 2. Waited 24 hours for feedback and didn't get anything negative.
>>> 3. Started this [VOTE] thread on Thursday
>>> 4. As indicated in the initial [VOTE] email, will wait until Monday for
>>> vote results.
>>> 5. If the vote passes, Monday I will start creating, signing and
>>> staging the first RC.
>>>
>>> Specifically other than my blunders earlier in the month I have not created a RC yet because the vote hasn't passed.
>>> Just trying to understand my mistakes so as to not repeat them.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/29/13 12:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>>> Hey Kevin,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry I was unclear. I meant, making the actual release candidate,
>>>> and then calling the VOTE on its release. I didn't mean calling the
>>>> VOTE to decide whether or not to make the RC.
>>>>
>>>> My bad, should have been specific.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for all of your effort!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>> Senior Computer Scientist
>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>
>>>> Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>>>> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:59 PM
>>>> To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>>>
>>>>> I sent the [DISCUSS] yesterday and Chris suggested waiting 24 hours and
>>>>> calling a vote which is exactly what I did. What am I missing?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/28/13 4:36 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>>>>>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>>>>>> <ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>>>>>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>>>>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>>>>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kevin.
>
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>.
OK. I see. The [DISCUSS] is enough to create the RC and the [VOTE] is
for approval of the RC. I assumed we were voting to ensure that
everyone agreed we should even create an RC. So I'll get busy and
create the RC and then call for a vote.
What is the proper way to terminate this thread. I'm assuming it will
take me a few days to properly create the RC.
On 3/29/13 12:04 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
> Hey Kevin, you basically need two steps. One a DISCUSS thread where
> you propose making a release, and (assuming folks agree) another a
> VOTE thread on a staged RC candidate. People (PPMC & IPMC) should try
> out the release and do the various RC checks, and then vote. If the
> vote passes make the release official..
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 29, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> I still don't understand. I thought I...
>>
>> 1. Started a [DISCUSS] thread on Wednesday.
>> 2. Waited 24 hours for feedback and didn't get anything negative.
>> 3. Started this [VOTE] thread on Thursday
>> 4. As indicated in the initial [VOTE] email, will wait until Monday for
>> vote results.
>> 5. If the vote passes, Monday I will start creating, signing and
>> staging the first RC.
>>
>> Specifically other than my blunders earlier in the month I have not created a RC yet because the vote hasn't passed.
>> Just trying to understand my mistakes so as to not repeat them.
>>
>>
>> On 3/29/13 12:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>> Hey Kevin,
>>>
>>> Sorry I was unclear. I meant, making the actual release candidate,
>>> and then calling the VOTE on its release. I didn't mean calling the
>>> VOTE to decide whether or not to make the RC.
>>>
>>> My bad, should have been specific.
>>>
>>> Thanks for all of your effort!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>> Senior Computer Scientist
>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>
>>> Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>>> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:59 PM
>>> To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>>
>>>> I sent the [DISCUSS] yesterday and Chris suggested waiting 24 hours and
>>>> calling a vote which is exactly what I did. What am I missing?
>>>>
>>>> On 3/28/13 4:36 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>>>>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>>>>> <ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>>>>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
>>>>>> try
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>>>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>>>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kevin.
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com>.
Hey Kevin, you basically need two steps. One a DISCUSS thread where
you propose making a release, and (assuming folks agree) another a
VOTE thread on a staged RC candidate. People (PPMC & IPMC) should try
out the release and do the various RC checks, and then vote. If the
vote passes make the release official..
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 29, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> I still don't understand. I thought I...
>
> 1. Started a [DISCUSS] thread on Wednesday.
> 2. Waited 24 hours for feedback and didn't get anything negative.
> 3. Started this [VOTE] thread on Thursday
> 4. As indicated in the initial [VOTE] email, will wait until Monday for
> vote results.
> 5. If the vote passes, Monday I will start creating, signing and
> staging the first RC.
>
> Specifically other than my blunders earlier in the month I have not created a RC yet because the vote hasn't passed.
> Just trying to understand my mistakes so as to not repeat them.
>
>
> On 3/29/13 12:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>> Hey Kevin,
>>
>> Sorry I was unclear. I meant, making the actual release candidate,
>> and then calling the VOTE on its release. I didn't mean calling the
>> VOTE to decide whether or not to make the RC.
>>
>> My bad, should have been specific.
>>
>> Thanks for all of your effort!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>
>> Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:59 PM
>> To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>
>>> I sent the [DISCUSS] yesterday and Chris suggested waiting 24 hours and
>>> calling a vote which is exactly what I did. What am I missing?
>>>
>>> On 3/28/13 4:36 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>>>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>>>> <ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>>>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
>>>>> try
>>>>> it.
>>>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>>>
>>>>> Kevin.
>
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hey Kevin,
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>
Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
Date: Friday, March 29, 2013 8:48 AM
To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>I still don't understand. I thought I...
>
> 1. Started a [DISCUSS] thread on Wednesday.
> 2. Waited 24 hours for feedback and didn't get anything negative.
> 3. Started this [VOTE] thread on Thursday
> 4. As indicated in the initial [VOTE] email, will wait until Monday for
> vote results.
> 5. If the vote passes, Monday I will start creating, signing and
> staging the first RC.
>
>Specifically other than my blunders earlier in the month I have not
>created a RC yet because the vote hasn't passed.
>Just trying to understand my mistakes so as to not repeat them.
Don't worry they aren't blunders.
Basically the idea is:
1. [DISCUSS], no objections; then
2. Do RC work (you need the URLs and staging repos/etc. before sending
[VOTE] RC email); then
3. [VOTE] release candidate on dev@knox
4. If all good in #3, then:
A. if you got 3 +1 IPMC votes in #4, you simply forward the result to
general@incubator
B. If you didn't get 3 +1 IPMC votes in #4, you ask for more VOTEs on
the general@incubator email
That's it.
You're doing great.
Cheers,
Chris
>
>
>On 3/29/13 12:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>> Hey Kevin,
>>
>> Sorry I was unclear. I meant, making the actual release candidate,
>> and then calling the VOTE on its release. I didn't mean calling the
>> VOTE to decide whether or not to make the RC.
>>
>> My bad, should have been specific.
>>
>> Thanks for all of your effort!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>
>> Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org"
>><de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:59 PM
>> To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>
>>> I sent the [DISCUSS] yesterday and Chris suggested waiting 24 hours and
>>> calling a vote which is exactly what I did. What am I missing?
>>>
>>> On 3/28/13 4:36 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>>>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>>>> <ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons
>>>>>for
>>>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
>>>>> try
>>>>> it.
>>>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>>>
>>>>> Kevin.
>>>>>
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>.
I still don't understand. I thought I...
1. Started a [DISCUSS] thread on Wednesday.
2. Waited 24 hours for feedback and didn't get anything negative.
3. Started this [VOTE] thread on Thursday
4. As indicated in the initial [VOTE] email, will wait until Monday for
vote results.
5. If the vote passes, Monday I will start creating, signing and
staging the first RC.
Specifically other than my blunders earlier in the month I have not
created a RC yet because the vote hasn't passed.
Just trying to understand my mistakes so as to not repeat them.
On 3/29/13 12:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hey Kevin,
>
> Sorry I was unclear. I meant, making the actual release candidate,
> and then calling the VOTE on its release. I didn't mean calling the
> VOTE to decide whether or not to make the RC.
>
> My bad, should have been specific.
>
> Thanks for all of your effort!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>
> Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:59 PM
> To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>
>> I sent the [DISCUSS] yesterday and Chris suggested waiting 24 hours and
>> calling a vote which is exactly what I did. What am I missing?
>>
>> On 3/28/13 4:36 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>>> <ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>>
>>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
>>>> try
>>>> it.
>>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>>
>>>> Kevin.
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hey Kevin,
Sorry I was unclear. I meant, making the actual release candidate,
and then calling the VOTE on its release. I didn't mean calling the
VOTE to decide whether or not to make the RC.
My bad, should have been specific.
Thanks for all of your effort!
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>
Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:59 PM
To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>I sent the [DISCUSS] yesterday and Chris suggested waiting 24 hours and
>calling a vote which is exactly what I did. What am I missing?
>
>On 3/28/13 4:36 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>> <ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>
>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
>>>try
>>> it.
>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>
>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>
>>> Kevin.
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>.
I sent the [DISCUSS] yesterday and Chris suggested waiting 24 hours and
calling a vote which is exactly what I did. What am I missing?
On 3/28/13 4:36 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
> <ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>
>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we try
>> it.
>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>
>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>
>> Kevin.
>>
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>.
The release doc is a bit of a mess and mostly just a place holder but is
linked of the site.
https://cwiki.apache.org/KNOX/release-process.html
On 3/28/13 6:03 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> +100!
>
> Makes sense to me, Kevin.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>
> Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:01 PM
> To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>
>> Chris,
>> I have a release process doc started based on a few examples I've
>> found. I found however that trying to document without actually having
>> done it once very difficult. This is one of the reasons I'm
>> recommending a release so that I can do it and document what was required.
>> Kevin.
>>
>> On 3/28/13 4:46 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>> +1 from me and yes, a [DISCUSS] would have been fine.
>>>
>>> Mainly to indicate that you are discussing it, but not to block you
>>> from doing it. However, in the meanwhile, one thing you may want to
>>> focus on Kevin is creating a ReleaseProcess doc like this one:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
>>>
>>>
>>> And putting on the wiki to let folks know what steps you are executing.
>>> Yes I know this is documented in general (in various places). However,
>>> having
>>> a project specific release doc, with simply the steps is great too.
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>> Senior Computer Scientist
>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com>
>>> Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org"
>>> <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>>> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:36 PM
>>> To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>>
>>>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>>>> <ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>>>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
>>>>> try
>>>>> it.
>>>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>>>
>>>>> Kevin.
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
+100!
Makes sense to me, Kevin.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>
Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:01 PM
To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>Chris,
>I have a release process doc started based on a few examples I've
>found. I found however that trying to document without actually having
>done it once very difficult. This is one of the reasons I'm
>recommending a release so that I can do it and document what was required.
>Kevin.
>
>On 3/28/13 4:46 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>> +1 from me and yes, a [DISCUSS] would have been fine.
>>
>> Mainly to indicate that you are discussing it, but not to block you
>> from doing it. However, in the meanwhile, one thing you may want to
>> focus on Kevin is creating a ReleaseProcess doc like this one:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
>>
>>
>> And putting on the wiki to let folks know what steps you are executing.
>> Yes I know this is documented in general (in various places). However,
>> having
>> a project specific release doc, with simply the steps is great too.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Chris
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com>
>> Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org"
>><de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:36 PM
>> To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>
>>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>>> <ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>>
>>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
>>>>try
>>>> it.
>>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>>
>>>> Kevin.
>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by Kevin Minder <ke...@hortonworks.com>.
Chris,
I have a release process doc started based on a few examples I've
found. I found however that trying to document without actually having
done it once very difficult. This is one of the reasons I'm
recommending a release so that I can do it and document what was required.
Kevin.
On 3/28/13 4:46 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> +1 from me and yes, a [DISCUSS] would have been fine.
>
> Mainly to indicate that you are discussing it, but not to block you
> from doing it. However, in the meanwhile, one thing you may want to
> focus on Kevin is creating a ReleaseProcess doc like this one:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
>
>
> And putting on the wiki to let folks know what steps you are executing.
> Yes I know this is documented in general (in various places). However,
> having
> a project specific release doc, with simply the steps is great too.
>
> Cheers!
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com>
> Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:36 PM
> To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>
>> Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>> <ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>
>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we try
>>> it.
>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>
>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>
>>> Kevin.
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by Sumit Mohanty <sm...@hortonworks.com>.
+1
On 3/28/13 1:46 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
<ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>+1 from me and yes, a [DISCUSS] would have been fine.
>
>Mainly to indicate that you are discussing it, but not to block you
>from doing it. However, in the meanwhile, one thing you may want to
>focus on Kevin is creating a ReleaseProcess doc like this one:
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
>
>
>And putting on the wiki to let folks know what steps you are executing.
>Yes I know this is documented in general (in various places). However,
>having
>a project specific release doc, with simply the steps is great too.
>
>Cheers!
>Chris
>
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>Senior Computer Scientist
>NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com>
>Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:36 PM
>To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>
>>Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
>><ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>>
>>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we
>>>try
>>> it.
>>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>>
>>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>>
>>> Kevin.
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
+1 from me and yes, a [DISCUSS] would have been fine.
Mainly to indicate that you are discussing it, but not to block you
from doing it. However, in the meanwhile, one thing you may want to
focus on Kevin is creating a ReleaseProcess doc like this one:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
And putting on the wiki to let folks know what steps you are executing.
Yes I know this is documented in general (in various places). However,
having
a project specific release doc, with simply the steps is great too.
Cheers!
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com>
Reply-To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:36 PM
To: "dev@knox.incubator.apache.org" <de...@knox.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
>
>
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
><ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
>> wanting a release at this time are:
>>
>> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we try
>> it.
>> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
>> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
>> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>>
>> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
>> [ ] +0 Don't care.
>> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>>
>> Kevin.
>>
Re: [VOTE] Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
Posted by Devaraj Das <dd...@hortonworks.com>.
Well this could have been a discussion.. But in any case, +1.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Kevin Minder
<ke...@hortonworks.com>wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I would like to propose creating a Knox 0.2.0 release. My reasons for
> wanting a release at this time are:
>
> 1) We won't know for certain what is required for a release until we try
> it.
> 2) The incubation docs recommend to release as soon as possible.
> 3) We have external people interested in finding out more about Knox.
> 4) I hope a release can help us recruit more external contributors.
>
> The vote will close on Monday, April 1st at 1pmPT/4pmET.
>
> [ ] +1 Create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't create an Apache Knox Gateway 0.2.0 release because...
>
> Kevin.
>