Re: Submission to ApacheCon on Tika

[Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, good! I'll adjust my submission so that it would work well as a
> possible followup to your talk, and we can coordinate the details if
> both get accepted.

Looks like all the Tika talks got accepted!

See http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/event/128f3cc50234ff7be822feea58870ca7
for my submission. As mentioned, I adjusted it to more explicitly
cover the odds and ends that won't fit (or won't be covered in much
detail) in the other presentations. So far I identified structured
text, language detection, type inference, XMP and JVM forking as such
topics. I can also cover things like details of type detection,
container parsing and the various ParseContext tricks we have,
depending on how much or little of those topics are already included
in the other presentations. Let's sync up on the details over the next
few weeks as we work on the presentations.

The schedule for Tika-related talks
(http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/?s=tika) looks a bit
awkward. My talk is scheduled for Wednesday morning before Nick's
afternoon slot, and Chris' and Annie's case studies overlap at 10am on
Wednesday. I guess we should ask the organizers to consider
rescheduling the talks.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: Submission to ApacheCon on Tika

[Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>]

Thanks Jukka!

My Tika talk had to be moved to Wednesday since I wasn't sure
I would be there at ApacheCon the whole time, and co-locating
my talks around the same day was advantageous, so I asked Rich
to move me. Annie's talk was originally I believe set for Wed
too, however I am not sure if she has the same constraints.

Cheers,
Chris




-----Original Message-----
From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <de...@tika.apache.org>
Date: Sunday, March 2, 2014 7:59 AM
To: Tika Development <de...@tika.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Submission to ApacheCon on Tika

>Hi,
>
>On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> OK, good! I'll adjust my submission so that it would work well as a
>> possible followup to your talk, and we can coordinate the details if
>> both get accepted.
>
>Looks like all the Tika talks got accepted!
>
>See 
>http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/event/128f3cc50234ff7be822feea5
>8870ca7
>for my submission. As mentioned, I adjusted it to more explicitly
>cover the odds and ends that won't fit (or won't be covered in much
>detail) in the other presentations. So far I identified structured
>text, language detection, type inference, XMP and JVM forking as such
>topics. I can also cover things like details of type detection,
>container parsing and the various ParseContext tricks we have,
>depending on how much or little of those topics are already included
>in the other presentations. Let's sync up on the details over the next
>few weeks as we work on the presentations.
>
>The schedule for Tika-related talks
>(http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/?s=tika) looks a bit
>awkward. My talk is scheduled for Wednesday morning before Nick's
>afternoon slot, and Chris' and Annie's case studies overlap at 10am on
>Wednesday. I guess we should ask the organizers to consider
>rescheduling the talks.
>
>BR,
>
>Jukka Zitting

Re: Submission to ApacheCon on Tika

[Nick Burch <ap...@gagravarr.org>]

On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> The schedule for Tika-related talks 
> (http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/?s=tika) looks a bit 
> awkward. My talk is scheduled for Wednesday morning before Nick's 
> afternoon slot, and Chris' and Annie's case studies overlap at 10am on 
> Wednesday. I guess we should ask the organizers to consider rescheduling 
> the talks.

Can you give Rich a prod about that? I'd asked him when the draft schedule 
came out to re-order them, but it looks like that has got lost / forgotten 
:(

(I'm also talking in the community track on Wednesday, so that does give a 
little bit of a constraint, but Rich had agreed to a tweak that would've 
kept a sensible order and not had me talking twice at the same time!)

Nick