You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Maurice Amsellem <ma...@systar.com> on 2013/11/08 02:11:00 UTC
SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Hi Team,
There have been many issues fixed for 4.12.
Is it intended to deliver a 4.11.1 soon ?
In which case, maybe we should create 4.11.1 version in JIRA, and use it in the FixVersion, instead of 4.12?
WDYT ?
Maurice
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by "piotr.zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Justin.
I'd like to help with this, so I'll try to fix some bugs soon and submit
patch.
Piotr
-----
Flex/Air developer open to new job offers and challenges.
piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/SDK-4-11-service-pack-tp32043p32336.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> What's with this "service pack"? Are you going to release version with
> latest fixes?
Apache doesn't have a concept of service packs, but if a serious issue exists with 4.11.0, any committer can patch the 4.11 branch, compile and create a 4.11.1 release and put it out there to vote on. The advantage here is that if 4.11.1 branch only have minimal changes from 4.11.0 so it's not going to require as much testing as a new 4.12.0 release (in theory).
Alternatively we can wait until we have enough patches and changes for a new 4.12.0 release, I'd guess (but it's not certain) that would be in 2 or 3 months time.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by "piotr.zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
What's with this "service pack"? Are you going to release version with
latest fixes?
Piotr
-----
Flex/Air developer open to new job offers and challenges.
piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/SDK-4-11-service-pack-tp32043p32331.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
On 14/11/2013 22:45, Mark Kessler wrote:
> supposed to match the build number?
That's what 4.9.1 does if you install it with the installer (files and
the XML agree).
Tom
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>.
Still too useful to give up RSLs. But isn't the RSLS in the flex config
supposed to match the build number?
-Mark
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> wrote:
> Yup, still happening, so we really should fix that too.
>
> Breaking RSLs is bad; though I understand people who want to move away
> from them now Adobe can't host trusted versions, for us we update our app
> more often than we change SDK version, so it's a benefit to have them.
>
> Tom
>
> On 14/11/2013 14:40, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
>
>> Look into frameworks/flex-config.xml
>>
>> The rsl urls version numbers are 0.0.0 instead of : 11.0.20131017
>>
>
>
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
Yup, still happening, so we really should fix that too.
Breaking RSLs is bad; though I understand people who want to move away
from them now Adobe can't host trusted versions, for us we update our
app more often than we change SDK version, so it's a benefit to have them.
Tom
On 14/11/2013 14:40, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
> Look into frameworks/flex-config.xml
>
> The rsl urls version numbers are 0.0.0 instead of : 11.0.20131017
RE: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Maurice Amsellem <ma...@systar.com>.
Look into frameworks/flex-config.xml
The rsl urls version numbers are 0.0.0 instead of : 11.0.20131017
Only an issue of you use rsls in your project.
Maurice
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Tom Chiverton [mailto:tc@extravision.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 14 novembre 2013 15:04
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
On 08/11/2013 01:57, Justin Mclean wrote:
> I think there was also an issue with the Flex config RSL numbers - easily fixed but still a pain.
Not sure what this is, but I've just done a fresh install (WinXP) of the latest SDK from the installer if you want me check something ?
Compiling AIR and Flex apps seems OK so far.
Tom
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
On 08/11/2013 01:57, Justin Mclean wrote:
> I think there was also an issue with the Flex config RSL numbers - easily fixed but still a pain.
Not sure what this is, but I've just done a fresh install (WinXP) of the
latest SDK from the installer if you want me check something ?
Compiling AIR and Flex apps seems OK so far.
Tom
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> - FLEX-33813 Flex Incorrectly Scaling Down Application on iPad
I think there was also an issue with the Flex config RSL numbers - easily fixed but still a pain.
> My question was also on the JIRA process: is it the way it should work to mark issues as fixed for the next major version ?
> How was it managed eg. for 4.9.1 ?
Just assume it's 4.12 and we'll rename if needed.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> If we KNOW that the next delivery will be 4.11.1, why name it 4.12, and rename it 4.12 just before the delivery ?
Because at the time the version is changed in the code we don't know what the next version will be. Remember it effects the nightly build in the installer and a few other things.
Thanks,
Justin
RE: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Maurice Amsellem <ma...@systar.com>.
That's also my opinion.
If we KNOW that the next delivery will be 4.11.1, why name it 4.12, and rename it 4.12 just before the delivery ?
Now, if a release will not necessary have an update (as was the case e.g. for 4.10), then the above does not stand.
Maurice
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Tianzhen Lin [mailto:tangent@usa.net]
Envoyé : vendredi 8 novembre 2013 15:16
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
I wonder if we may have any target release cycles, for example 2 months between the release of 4.x and 4.x+1. If so, any fixes designed to release between release cycles could use the 4.x.y theme.
For that matter, without knowing all the efforts going on, I tend to have an impression that the service pack may be better called as 4.11.1, and containing only well known errors reported since 4.11
My two cents.
Tangent
On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:44 PM, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
> From the ones I have worked on :
>
> - FLEX-33813 Flex Incorrectly Scaling Down Application on iPad
>
> is the only one that has no workaround, and is a regression.
>
> My question was also on the JIRA process: is it the way it should work to mark issues as fixed for the next major version ?
> How was it managed eg. for 4.9.1 ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Maurice
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com] Envoyé : vendredi 8 novembre
> 2013 02:32 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
>
> What is in the fixed list that we need to get out so quickly (because there is no workaround or is a serious regression)?
>
> On 11/7/13 5:11 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" <ma...@systar.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> There have been many issues fixed for 4.12.
>>
>> Is it intended to deliver a 4.11.1 soon ?
>>
>> In which case, maybe we should create 4.11.1 version in JIRA, and use
>> it in the FixVersion, instead of 4.12?
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Maurice
>>
>
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Tianzhen Lin <ta...@usa.net>.
I wonder if we may have any target release cycles, for example 2 months between the release of 4.x and 4.x+1. If so, any fixes designed to release between release cycles could use the 4.x.y theme.
For that matter, without knowing all the efforts going on, I tend to have an impression that the service pack may be better called as 4.11.1, and containing only well known errors reported since 4.11
My two cents.
Tangent
On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:44 PM, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
> From the ones I have worked on :
>
> - FLEX-33813 Flex Incorrectly Scaling Down Application on iPad
>
> is the only one that has no workaround, and is a regression.
>
> My question was also on the JIRA process: is it the way it should work to mark issues as fixed for the next major version ?
> How was it managed eg. for 4.9.1 ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Maurice
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
> Envoyé : vendredi 8 novembre 2013 02:32
> À : dev@flex.apache.org
> Objet : Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
>
> What is in the fixed list that we need to get out so quickly (because there is no workaround or is a serious regression)?
>
> On 11/7/13 5:11 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" <ma...@systar.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> There have been many issues fixed for 4.12.
>>
>> Is it intended to deliver a 4.11.1 soon ?
>>
>> In which case, maybe we should create 4.11.1 version in JIRA, and use
>> it in the FixVersion, instead of 4.12?
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Maurice
>>
>
RE: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Maurice Amsellem <ma...@systar.com>.
>From the ones I have worked on :
- FLEX-33813 Flex Incorrectly Scaling Down Application on iPad
is the only one that has no workaround, and is a regression.
My question was also on the JIRA process: is it the way it should work to mark issues as fixed for the next major version ?
How was it managed eg. for 4.9.1 ?
Thanks,
Maurice
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 8 novembre 2013 02:32
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
What is in the fixed list that we need to get out so quickly (because there is no workaround or is a serious regression)?
On 11/7/13 5:11 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" <ma...@systar.com> wrote:
>Hi Team,
>
>There have been many issues fixed for 4.12.
>
>Is it intended to deliver a 4.11.1 soon ?
>
>In which case, maybe we should create 4.11.1 version in JIRA, and use
>it in the FixVersion, instead of 4.12?
>
>WDYT ?
>
>Maurice
>
Re: SDK 4.11 service pack ?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
What is in the fixed list that we need to get out so quickly (because
there is no workaround or is a serious regression)?
On 11/7/13 5:11 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" <ma...@systar.com> wrote:
>Hi Team,
>
>There have been many issues fixed for 4.12.
>
>Is it intended to deliver a 4.11.1 soon ?
>
>In which case, maybe we should create 4.11.1 version in JIRA, and use it
>in the FixVersion, instead of 4.12?
>
>WDYT ?
>
>Maurice
>