[CANCEL] [VOTE] AciveMQ Protocol Buffers 1.0 and Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.0 releases

[Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>]

Hi,

I'm canceling this release because of source archive problem.

As we're waiting for Colin's tests to finish and we will possibly have some
tweaking in the default configs, I would like to use this time window to
release protobuf 1.0 in a separate release and thus avoid this issue of
including protobuf source in activemq release.

I've merged David's changes in the protobuf release and adapted it a bit
more. It builds fine from source release and activemq (5.3 branch) builds
and runs fine with it. I'll run a full activemq 5.3 branch build with it on
Monday.

I'm starting a new vote for this on a new thread.


Thank you all for your help
--
Dejan Bosanac

Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net


On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:20 AM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>wrote:

> IMO since you aren't building protbuf as part of amq, it is a separate
> bunch of stuff and a separate release with a separate source archive.  If
> you want a single source archive, put the protobuf modules inside the amq
> tree and link up the build.
>
> I think I already set up the protobuf build inside amq 6 to the new style
> stuff, sorry I missed this one, but should be easy to merge the changes.
>
> So this means I'm -1 on these releases since the source archive is a
> required part of the release.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>
>  Ok, I'll modify tomorrow how we create source release and include protobuf
>> code in it. I guess I'll need to tweak assembly-plugin and
>> apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor, but have to research it more on
>> how to do it. If anybody has any experience with this and would provide
>> any
>> pointers it would be very helpful.
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac
>>
>> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Yeah that that does not have the source tar ball for the protobuf
>>> release.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>  On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Hiram Chirino <ch...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could you also post links to the source tarballs?  Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He already did:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/activemq-staging-030/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.3.0/
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>> --
>>>> perl -e 'print
>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>>> );'
>>>>
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>>>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>>
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com/
>>>
>>>
>