You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@continuum.apache.org by Nigel Magnay <ni...@gmail.com> on 2006/04/25 15:47:11 UTC
is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?
It's in the release note -
I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?
Posted by Mang Jun Lau <Ma...@otpp.com>.
How does this actually work? I put P:\builds into the Deployment
Repository Directory field and the build is not copied over. Am I missing
some setting or something?
_Mang Lau
"Nigel Magnay" <ni...@gmail.com>
04/25/2006 11:06 AM
Please respond to
continuum-users@maven.apache.org
To
continuum-users@maven.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?
AHa - that fixed it (and a little local difficulty in forgetting I
needed to do mvn -U)
Is there a wiki for this kind of stuff that I could add to? I can't
believe I'll be the last to tie my own shoelaces together on that one.
On 25/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> Do you have define the deployment repository field in configuration
screen? It's empty by default.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Nigel Magnay a écrit :
> > Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
> > handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
> > nice.
> >
> > On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.
> >>
> >>- Brett
> >>
> >>On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>It's in the release note -
> >>>I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?
Posted by Baron Reznik <br...@fastmobile.com>.
Perhaps create a wiki, and add a patch for the FAQ to point to the
wiki? :-)
I agree though - a continuum wiki would be nice.
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 18:33 +0200, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> You can create a patch for FAQ or other pages and I'll apply it
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Nigel Magnay a écrit :
> > AHa - that fixed it (and a little local difficulty in forgetting I
> > needed to do mvn -U)
> >
> > Is there a wiki for this kind of stuff that I could add to? I can't
> > believe I'll be the last to tie my own shoelaces together on that one.
> >
> > On 25/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> >
> >>Do you have define the deployment repository field in configuration screen? It's empty by default.
> >>
> >>Emmanuel
> >>
> >>Nigel Magnay a écrit :
> >>
> >>>Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
> >>>handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
> >>>nice.
> >>>
> >>>On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.
> >>>>
> >>>>- Brett
> >>>>
> >>>>On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>It's in the release note -
> >>>>>I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
You can create a patch for FAQ or other pages and I'll apply it
Emmanuel
Nigel Magnay a écrit :
> AHa - that fixed it (and a little local difficulty in forgetting I
> needed to do mvn -U)
>
> Is there a wiki for this kind of stuff that I could add to? I can't
> believe I'll be the last to tie my own shoelaces together on that one.
>
> On 25/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>
>>Do you have define the deployment repository field in configuration screen? It's empty by default.
>>
>>Emmanuel
>>
>>Nigel Magnay a écrit :
>>
>>>Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
>>>handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
>>>nice.
>>>
>>>On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.
>>>>
>>>>- Brett
>>>>
>>>>On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>It's in the release note -
>>>>>I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?
Posted by Nigel Magnay <ni...@gmail.com>.
AHa - that fixed it (and a little local difficulty in forgetting I
needed to do mvn -U)
Is there a wiki for this kind of stuff that I could add to? I can't
believe I'll be the last to tie my own shoelaces together on that one.
On 25/04/06, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> Do you have define the deployment repository field in configuration screen? It's empty by default.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Nigel Magnay a écrit :
> > Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
> > handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
> > nice.
> >
> > On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.
> >>
> >>- Brett
> >>
> >>On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>It's in the release note -
> >>>I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Do you have define the deployment repository field in configuration screen? It's empty by default.
Emmanuel
Nigel Magnay a écrit :
> Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
> handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
> nice.
>
> On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.
>>
>>- Brett
>>
>>On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>It's in the release note -
>>>I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?
Posted by Nigel Magnay <ni...@gmail.com>.
Hmm.. I must be doing something wrong - are there any docs for this or
handy pointers? It sounds a really useful feature - 1.0.3 is really
nice.
On 25/04/06, Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.
>
> - Brett
>
> On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's in the release note -
> > I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
> >
>
Re: is CONTINUUM-609 really in 1.0.3?
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
It's not browsable, but it will work just fine when used from Maven.
- Brett
On 4/25/06, Nigel Magnay <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's in the release note -
> I try http://box:8080/continuum/repository but just get a 404 ?
>