You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Norberto Meijome <fr...@meijome.net> on 2008/06/24 04:05:36 UTC

Cost of having fieldTypes defined but not used

Hi all,
I'm curious , what is the cost (memory / processing time @ load? performance hit ? ) of having several unused fieldTypes defined in schema.xml ?

cheers,
B

_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome

"Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity."
  Frank Leahy

I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.

Re: Cost of having fieldTypes defined but not used

Posted by Mike Klaas <mi...@gmail.com>.

On 23-Jun-08, at 7:05 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm curious , what is the cost (memory / processing time @ load?  
> performance hit ? ) of having several unused fieldTypes defined in  
> schema.xml ?

Affects startup time only, likely non-measurable.

-Mike