You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@calcite.apache.org by Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> on 2025/02/26 08:46:17 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
Hello everyone,
Now that Avatica 1.26.0 has been released [1], I think we can resume the
discussion towards Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an Avatica upgrade).
@Stamatis, as RM did you have any timing in mind?
Best,
Ruben
[1] https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/news/2025/02/24/release-1.26.0/
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:27 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes, I can be the RM that's why I started this thread. I also started
> going over the tickets tagged for 1.39.0 to see what can make it and
> what not.
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:56 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Francis. I think it is preferable to focus first on Avatica
> > 1.26.0, and afterwards releasing Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an
> > upgrade to said Avatica version).
> >
> > BTW, according to previous threads [1], the next release managers should
> be:
> > - 1.39.0 Stamatis Zampetakis
> > - 1.40.0 Hongyu Guo
> > - 1.41.0 Jing Zhang
> >
> > @Stamatis, are you still available to be the next release manager for
> > 1.39.0?
> >
> > Best,
> > Ruben
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tw1rlv5yznlmqtt2chgfwy04f0wxtbhm
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:55 PM Francis Chuang <francischuang@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Let's try and get Avatica out first as it's been more than 8 months
> > > since the last release and I think we are very close with getting most
> > > of the PRs in. Another benefit is that Calcite can upgrade to the
> latest
> > > version of Avatica for release 1.39.0
> > >
> > > On 14/01/2025 4:58 am, Mihai Budiu wrote:
> > > > Personally I hope we can merge
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4139
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 4:35 AM
> > > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > It's been almost three months since our last release (15 Oct 2024)
> and
> > > > there are about 135 new commits in main. I think it is a good time to
> > > > start the discussion for 1.39.0.
> > > >
> > > > From the existing tickets tagged for 1.39.0 [1], I don't see release
> > > > blockers. Are there any other must have items that we want to include
> > > > in the release?
> > > >
> > > > There is a parallel thread about an Avatica release so I guess one of
> > > > the main questions is how we should proceed in terms of timing. Do we
> > > > want to focus on Avatica first or advance both in parallel?
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Stamatis
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
Posted by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
Calcite 1.39.0 is released so main is again open for receiving new commits.
Best,
Stamatis
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 6:13 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am starting the release process. Please hold off your commits to main.
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 1:05 AM Xiong Duan <xi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for the first RC on March 10, 2025.
> >
> > Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2025年3月5日周三 03:40写道：
> > >
> > > +1 for March 10th RC
> > >
> > > There are only 4 open issues tagged 1.39 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.39.0%20%20AND%20%20%20statusCategory%20%20!%3D%20Done ]
> > >
> > > > On Mar 4, 2025, at 2:56 AM, Alessandro Solimando <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I share the same feeling, there are no blockers currently and the current
> > > > release is already pretty massive.
> > > > Thanks Stamatis for this hard work!
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 11:54, Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I think this is a reasonable plan as this release is quite behind. The
> > > >> nice to haves, unless they can be committed by March 10, can go into the
> > > >> next release (approx. 3 months away) if we get back to our usual release
> > > >> cadence.
> > > >>
> > > >> On 4/03/2025 9:46 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
> > > >>> Hi all,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The 1.39.0 release already has more than 200 tickets and given that we
> > > >>> are behind our usual (~3 months) release cadence I would suggest
> > > >>> cutting an RC rather soon.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I went over the tickets in the 1.39.0 release dashboard [1] and didn't
> > > >>> see any release blockers. I removed the fix version for some tickets
> > > >>> that are somewhat abandoned and asked for feedback on some others to
> > > >>> gauge the likelihood about inclusion in the release.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> If there are any issues/PRs that we must include in the release please
> > > >>> let me know.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> As things stand right now I could cut the first RC on March 10, 2025.
> > > >>> How do you feel about this timeline?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Stamatis
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1]
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:50 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hello everyone,
> > > >>>> Now that Avatica 1.26.0 has been released [1], I think we can resume the
> > > >>>> discussion towards Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an Avatica
> > > >> upgrade).
> > > >>>> @Stamatis, as RM did you have any timing in mind?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best,
> > > >>>> Ruben
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/news/2025/02/24/release-1.26.0/
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:27 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Yes, I can be the RM that's why I started this thread. I also started
> > > >>>>> going over the tickets tagged for 1.39.0 to see what can make it and
> > > >>>>> what not.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>> Stamatis
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:56 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I agree with Francis. I think it is preferable to focus first on
> > > >> Avatica
> > > >>>>>> 1.26.0, and afterwards releasing Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include
> > > >> an
> > > >>>>>> upgrade to said Avatica version).
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> BTW, according to previous threads [1], the next release managers
> > > >> should
> > > >>>>> be:
> > > >>>>>> - 1.39.0 Stamatis Zampetakis
> > > >>>>>> - 1.40.0 Hongyu Guo
> > > >>>>>> - 1.41.0 Jing Zhang
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> @Stamatis, are you still available to be the next release manager for
> > > >>>>>> 1.39.0?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>> Ruben
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tw1rlv5yznlmqtt2chgfwy04f0wxtbhm
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:55 PM Francis Chuang <
> > > >> francischuang@apache.org
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Let's try and get Avatica out first as it's been more than 8 months
> > > >>>>>>> since the last release and I think we are very close with getting
> > > >> most
> > > >>>>>>> of the PRs in. Another benefit is that Calcite can upgrade to the
> > > >>>>> latest
> > > >>>>>>> version of Avatica for release 1.39.0
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 14/01/2025 4:58 am, Mihai Budiu wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> Personally I hope we can merge
> > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4139
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > > >>>>>>>> From: Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 4:35 AM
> > > >>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Hi all,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> It's been almost three months since our last release (15 Oct 2024)
> > > >>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>> there are about 135 new commits in main. I think it is a good time
> > > >> to
> > > >>>>>>>> start the discussion for 1.39.0.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> From the existing tickets tagged for 1.39.0 [1], I don't see
> > > >> release
> > > >>>>>>>> blockers. Are there any other must have items that we want to
> > > >> include
> > > >>>>>>>> in the release?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> There is a parallel thread about an Avatica release so I guess one
> > > >> of
> > > >>>>>>>> the main questions is how we should proceed in terms of timing. Do
> > > >> we
> > > >>>>>>>> want to focus on Avatica first or advance both in parallel?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>> Stamatis
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
Posted by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>.
Hi everyone,
I am starting the release process. Please hold off your commits to main.
Best,
Stamatis
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 1:05 AM Xiong Duan <xi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 for the first RC on March 10, 2025.
>
> Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2025年3月5日周三 03:40写道：
> >
> > +1 for March 10th RC
> >
> > There are only 4 open issues tagged 1.39 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.39.0%20%20AND%20%20%20statusCategory%20%20!%3D%20Done ]
> >
> > > On Mar 4, 2025, at 2:56 AM, Alessandro Solimando <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I share the same feeling, there are no blockers currently and the current
> > > release is already pretty massive.
> > > Thanks Stamatis for this hard work!
> > >
> > > On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 11:54, Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think this is a reasonable plan as this release is quite behind. The
> > >> nice to haves, unless they can be committed by March 10, can go into the
> > >> next release (approx. 3 months away) if we get back to our usual release
> > >> cadence.
> > >>
> > >> On 4/03/2025 9:46 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> The 1.39.0 release already has more than 200 tickets and given that we
> > >>> are behind our usual (~3 months) release cadence I would suggest
> > >>> cutting an RC rather soon.
> > >>>
> > >>> I went over the tickets in the 1.39.0 release dashboard [1] and didn't
> > >>> see any release blockers. I removed the fix version for some tickets
> > >>> that are somewhat abandoned and asked for feedback on some others to
> > >>> gauge the likelihood about inclusion in the release.
> > >>>
> > >>> If there are any issues/PRs that we must include in the release please
> > >>> let me know.
> > >>>
> > >>> As things stand right now I could cut the first RC on March 10, 2025.
> > >>> How do you feel about this timeline?
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Stamatis
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:50 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hello everyone,
> > >>>> Now that Avatica 1.26.0 has been released [1], I think we can resume the
> > >>>> discussion towards Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an Avatica
> > >> upgrade).
> > >>>> @Stamatis, as RM did you have any timing in mind?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Ruben
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/news/2025/02/24/release-1.26.0/
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:27 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Yes, I can be the RM that's why I started this thread. I also started
> > >>>>> going over the tickets tagged for 1.39.0 to see what can make it and
> > >>>>> what not.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best,
> > >>>>> Stamatis
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:56 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I agree with Francis. I think it is preferable to focus first on
> > >> Avatica
> > >>>>>> 1.26.0, and afterwards releasing Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include
> > >> an
> > >>>>>> upgrade to said Avatica version).
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> BTW, according to previous threads [1], the next release managers
> > >> should
> > >>>>> be:
> > >>>>>> - 1.39.0 Stamatis Zampetakis
> > >>>>>> - 1.40.0 Hongyu Guo
> > >>>>>> - 1.41.0 Jing Zhang
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @Stamatis, are you still available to be the next release manager for
> > >>>>>> 1.39.0?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> Ruben
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tw1rlv5yznlmqtt2chgfwy04f0wxtbhm
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:55 PM Francis Chuang <
> > >> francischuang@apache.org
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Let's try and get Avatica out first as it's been more than 8 months
> > >>>>>>> since the last release and I think we are very close with getting
> > >> most
> > >>>>>>> of the PRs in. Another benefit is that Calcite can upgrade to the
> > >>>>> latest
> > >>>>>>> version of Avatica for release 1.39.0
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 14/01/2025 4:58 am, Mihai Budiu wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Personally I hope we can merge
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4139
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>> From: Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 4:35 AM
> > >>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> It's been almost three months since our last release (15 Oct 2024)
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>> there are about 135 new commits in main. I think it is a good time
> > >> to
> > >>>>>>>> start the discussion for 1.39.0.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> From the existing tickets tagged for 1.39.0 [1], I don't see
> > >> release
> > >>>>>>>> blockers. Are there any other must have items that we want to
> > >> include
> > >>>>>>>> in the release?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> There is a parallel thread about an Avatica release so I guess one
> > >> of
> > >>>>>>>> the main questions is how we should proceed in terms of timing. Do
> > >> we
> > >>>>>>>> want to focus on Avatica first or advance both in parallel?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>> Stamatis
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
Posted by Xiong Duan <xi...@apache.org>.
+1 for the first RC on March 10, 2025.
Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com> 于2025年3月5日周三 03:40写道：
>
> +1 for March 10th RC
>
> There are only 4 open issues tagged 1.39 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.39.0%20%20AND%20%20%20statusCategory%20%20!%3D%20Done ]
>
> > On Mar 4, 2025, at 2:56 AM, Alessandro Solimando <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I share the same feeling, there are no blockers currently and the current
> > release is already pretty massive.
> > Thanks Stamatis for this hard work!
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 11:54, Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think this is a reasonable plan as this release is quite behind. The
> >> nice to haves, unless they can be committed by March 10, can go into the
> >> next release (approx. 3 months away) if we get back to our usual release
> >> cadence.
> >>
> >> On 4/03/2025 9:46 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> The 1.39.0 release already has more than 200 tickets and given that we
> >>> are behind our usual (~3 months) release cadence I would suggest
> >>> cutting an RC rather soon.
> >>>
> >>> I went over the tickets in the 1.39.0 release dashboard [1] and didn't
> >>> see any release blockers. I removed the fix version for some tickets
> >>> that are somewhat abandoned and asked for feedback on some others to
> >>> gauge the likelihood about inclusion in the release.
> >>>
> >>> If there are any issues/PRs that we must include in the release please
> >>> let me know.
> >>>
> >>> As things stand right now I could cut the first RC on March 10, 2025.
> >>> How do you feel about this timeline?
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Stamatis
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:50 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello everyone,
> >>>> Now that Avatica 1.26.0 has been released [1], I think we can resume the
> >>>> discussion towards Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an Avatica
> >> upgrade).
> >>>> @Stamatis, as RM did you have any timing in mind?
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Ruben
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/news/2025/02/24/release-1.26.0/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:27 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Yes, I can be the RM that's why I started this thread. I also started
> >>>>> going over the tickets tagged for 1.39.0 to see what can make it and
> >>>>> what not.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Stamatis
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:56 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I agree with Francis. I think it is preferable to focus first on
> >> Avatica
> >>>>>> 1.26.0, and afterwards releasing Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include
> >> an
> >>>>>> upgrade to said Avatica version).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BTW, according to previous threads [1], the next release managers
> >> should
> >>>>> be:
> >>>>>> - 1.39.0 Stamatis Zampetakis
> >>>>>> - 1.40.0 Hongyu Guo
> >>>>>> - 1.41.0 Jing Zhang
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> @Stamatis, are you still available to be the next release manager for
> >>>>>> 1.39.0?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Ruben
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tw1rlv5yznlmqtt2chgfwy04f0wxtbhm
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:55 PM Francis Chuang <
> >> francischuang@apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Let's try and get Avatica out first as it's been more than 8 months
> >>>>>>> since the last release and I think we are very close with getting
> >> most
> >>>>>>> of the PRs in. Another benefit is that Calcite can upgrade to the
> >>>>> latest
> >>>>>>> version of Avatica for release 1.39.0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 14/01/2025 4:58 am, Mihai Budiu wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Personally I hope we can merge
> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4139
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>> From: Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 4:35 AM
> >>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's been almost three months since our last release (15 Oct 2024)
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> there are about 135 new commits in main. I think it is a good time
> >> to
> >>>>>>>> start the discussion for 1.39.0.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> From the existing tickets tagged for 1.39.0 [1], I don't see
> >> release
> >>>>>>>> blockers. Are there any other must have items that we want to
> >> include
> >>>>>>>> in the release?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There is a parallel thread about an Avatica release so I guess one
> >> of
> >>>>>>>> the main questions is how we should proceed in terms of timing. Do
> >> we
> >>>>>>>> want to focus on Avatica first or advance both in parallel?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> Stamatis
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
Posted by Julian Hyde <jh...@gmail.com>.
+1 for March 10th RC
There are only 4 open issues tagged 1.39 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.39.0%20%20AND%20%20%20statusCategory%20%20!%3D%20Done ]
> On Mar 4, 2025, at 2:56 AM, Alessandro Solimando <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I share the same feeling, there are no blockers currently and the current
> release is already pretty massive.
> Thanks Stamatis for this hard work!
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 11:54, Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I think this is a reasonable plan as this release is quite behind. The
>> nice to haves, unless they can be committed by March 10, can go into the
>> next release (approx. 3 months away) if we get back to our usual release
>> cadence.
>>
>> On 4/03/2025 9:46 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The 1.39.0 release already has more than 200 tickets and given that we
>>> are behind our usual (~3 months) release cadence I would suggest
>>> cutting an RC rather soon.
>>>
>>> I went over the tickets in the 1.39.0 release dashboard [1] and didn't
>>> see any release blockers. I removed the fix version for some tickets
>>> that are somewhat abandoned and asked for feedback on some others to
>>> gauge the likelihood about inclusion in the release.
>>>
>>> If there are any issues/PRs that we must include in the release please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> As things stand right now I could cut the first RC on March 10, 2025.
>>> How do you feel about this timeline?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Stamatis
>>>
>>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:50 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>> Now that Avatica 1.26.0 has been released [1], I think we can resume the
>>>> discussion towards Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an Avatica
>> upgrade).
>>>> @Stamatis, as RM did you have any timing in mind?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Ruben
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/news/2025/02/24/release-1.26.0/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:27 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I can be the RM that's why I started this thread. I also started
>>>>> going over the tickets tagged for 1.39.0 to see what can make it and
>>>>> what not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Stamatis
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:56 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with Francis. I think it is preferable to focus first on
>> Avatica
>>>>>> 1.26.0, and afterwards releasing Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include
>> an
>>>>>> upgrade to said Avatica version).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, according to previous threads [1], the next release managers
>> should
>>>>> be:
>>>>>> - 1.39.0 Stamatis Zampetakis
>>>>>> - 1.40.0 Hongyu Guo
>>>>>> - 1.41.0 Jing Zhang
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Stamatis, are you still available to be the next release manager for
>>>>>> 1.39.0?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Ruben
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tw1rlv5yznlmqtt2chgfwy04f0wxtbhm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:55 PM Francis Chuang <
>> francischuang@apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's try and get Avatica out first as it's been more than 8 months
>>>>>>> since the last release and I think we are very close with getting
>> most
>>>>>>> of the PRs in. Another benefit is that Calcite can upgrade to the
>>>>> latest
>>>>>>> version of Avatica for release 1.39.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 14/01/2025 4:58 am, Mihai Budiu wrote:
>>>>>>>> Personally I hope we can merge
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4139
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>> From: Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 4:35 AM
>>>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's been almost three months since our last release (15 Oct 2024)
>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> there are about 135 new commits in main. I think it is a good time
>> to
>>>>>>>> start the discussion for 1.39.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From the existing tickets tagged for 1.39.0 [1], I don't see
>> release
>>>>>>>> blockers. Are there any other must have items that we want to
>> include
>>>>>>>> in the release?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is a parallel thread about an Avatica release so I guess one
>> of
>>>>>>>> the main questions is how we should proceed in terms of timing. Do
>> we
>>>>>>>> want to focus on Avatica first or advance both in parallel?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Stamatis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
Posted by Alessandro Solimando <al...@gmail.com>.
I share the same feeling, there are no blockers currently and the current
release is already pretty massive.
Thanks Stamatis for this hard work!
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 11:54, Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>
wrote:
> I think this is a reasonable plan as this release is quite behind. The
> nice to haves, unless they can be committed by March 10, can go into the
> next release (approx. 3 months away) if we get back to our usual release
> cadence.
>
> On 4/03/2025 9:46 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The 1.39.0 release already has more than 200 tickets and given that we
> > are behind our usual (~3 months) release cadence I would suggest
> > cutting an RC rather soon.
> >
> > I went over the tickets in the 1.39.0 release dashboard [1] and didn't
> > see any release blockers. I removed the fix version for some tickets
> > that are somewhat abandoned and asked for feedback on some others to
> > gauge the likelihood about inclusion in the release.
> >
> > If there are any issues/PRs that we must include in the release please
> > let me know.
> >
> > As things stand right now I could cut the first RC on March 10, 2025.
> > How do you feel about this timeline?
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> > [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:50 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello everyone,
> >> Now that Avatica 1.26.0 has been released [1], I think we can resume the
> >> discussion towards Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an Avatica
> upgrade).
> >> @Stamatis, as RM did you have any timing in mind?
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Ruben
> >>
> >> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/news/2025/02/24/release-1.26.0/
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:27 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, I can be the RM that's why I started this thread. I also started
> >>> going over the tickets tagged for 1.39.0 to see what can make it and
> >>> what not.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Stamatis
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:56 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I agree with Francis. I think it is preferable to focus first on
> Avatica
> >>>> 1.26.0, and afterwards releasing Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include
> an
> >>>> upgrade to said Avatica version).
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW, according to previous threads [1], the next release managers
> should
> >>> be:
> >>>> - 1.39.0 Stamatis Zampetakis
> >>>> - 1.40.0 Hongyu Guo
> >>>> - 1.41.0 Jing Zhang
> >>>>
> >>>> @Stamatis, are you still available to be the next release manager for
> >>>> 1.39.0?
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Ruben
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tw1rlv5yznlmqtt2chgfwy04f0wxtbhm
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:55 PM Francis Chuang <
> francischuang@apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Let's try and get Avatica out first as it's been more than 8 months
> >>>>> since the last release and I think we are very close with getting
> most
> >>>>> of the PRs in. Another benefit is that Calcite can upgrade to the
> >>> latest
> >>>>> version of Avatica for release 1.39.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 14/01/2025 4:58 am, Mihai Budiu wrote:
> >>>>>> Personally I hope we can merge
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4139
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>> From: Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 4:35 AM
> >>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> >>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It's been almost three months since our last release (15 Oct 2024)
> >>> and
> >>>>>> there are about 135 new commits in main. I think it is a good time
> to
> >>>>>> start the discussion for 1.39.0.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From the existing tickets tagged for 1.39.0 [1], I don't see
> release
> >>>>>> blockers. Are there any other must have items that we want to
> include
> >>>>>> in the release?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There is a parallel thread about an Avatica release so I guess one
> of
> >>>>>> the main questions is how we should proceed in terms of timing. Do
> we
> >>>>>> want to focus on Avatica first or advance both in parallel?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Stamatis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
Posted by Francis Chuang <fr...@apache.org>.
I think this is a reasonable plan as this release is quite behind. The
nice to haves, unless they can be committed by March 10, can go into the
next release (approx. 3 months away) if we get back to our usual release
cadence.
On 4/03/2025 9:46 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The 1.39.0 release already has more than 200 tickets and given that we
> are behind our usual (~3 months) release cadence I would suggest
> cutting an RC rather soon.
>
> I went over the tickets in the 1.39.0 release dashboard [1] and didn't
> see any release blockers. I removed the fix version for some tickets
> that are somewhat abandoned and asked for feedback on some others to
> gauge the likelihood about inclusion in the release.
>
> If there are any issues/PRs that we must include in the release please
> let me know.
>
> As things stand right now I could cut the first RC on March 10, 2025.
> How do you feel about this timeline?
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:50 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>> Now that Avatica 1.26.0 has been released [1], I think we can resume the
>> discussion towards Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an Avatica upgrade).
>> @Stamatis, as RM did you have any timing in mind?
>>
>> Best,
>> Ruben
>>
>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/news/2025/02/24/release-1.26.0/
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:27 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I can be the RM that's why I started this thread. I also started
>>> going over the tickets tagged for 1.39.0 to see what can make it and
>>> what not.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Stamatis
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:56 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Francis. I think it is preferable to focus first on Avatica
>>>> 1.26.0, and afterwards releasing Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an
>>>> upgrade to said Avatica version).
>>>>
>>>> BTW, according to previous threads [1], the next release managers should
>>> be:
>>>> - 1.39.0 Stamatis Zampetakis
>>>> - 1.40.0 Hongyu Guo
>>>> - 1.41.0 Jing Zhang
>>>>
>>>> @Stamatis, are you still available to be the next release manager for
>>>> 1.39.0?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Ruben
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tw1rlv5yznlmqtt2chgfwy04f0wxtbhm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:55 PM Francis Chuang <francischuang@apache.org
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Let's try and get Avatica out first as it's been more than 8 months
>>>>> since the last release and I think we are very close with getting most
>>>>> of the PRs in. Another benefit is that Calcite can upgrade to the
>>> latest
>>>>> version of Avatica for release 1.39.0
>>>>>
>>>>> On 14/01/2025 4:58 am, Mihai Budiu wrote:
>>>>>> Personally I hope we can merge
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4139
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>> From: Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@apache.org>
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 4:35 AM
>>>>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
>>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's been almost three months since our last release (15 Oct 2024)
>>> and
>>>>>> there are about 135 new commits in main. I think it is a good time to
>>>>>> start the discussion for 1.39.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From the existing tickets tagged for 1.39.0 [1], I don't see release
>>>>>> blockers. Are there any other must have items that we want to include
>>>>>> in the release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a parallel thread about an Avatica release so I guess one of
>>>>>> the main questions is how we should proceed in terms of timing. Do we
>>>>>> want to focus on Avatica first or advance both in parallel?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Stamatis
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
Posted by Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
The 1.39.0 release already has more than 200 tickets and given that we
are behind our usual (~3 months) release cadence I would suggest
cutting an RC rather soon.
I went over the tickets in the 1.39.0 release dashboard [1] and didn't
see any release blockers. I removed the fix version for some tickets
that are somewhat abandoned and asked for feedback on some others to
gauge the likelihood about inclusion in the release.
If there are any issues/PRs that we must include in the release please
let me know.
As things stand right now I could cut the first RC on March 10, 2025.
How do you feel about this timeline?
Best,
Stamatis
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:50 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> Now that Avatica 1.26.0 has been released [1], I think we can resume the
> discussion towards Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an Avatica upgrade).
> @Stamatis, as RM did you have any timing in mind?
>
> Best,
> Ruben
>
> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/news/2025/02/24/release-1.26.0/
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:27 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I can be the RM that's why I started this thread. I also started
> > going over the tickets tagged for 1.39.0 to see what can make it and
> > what not.
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 8:56 AM Ruben Q L <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree with Francis. I think it is preferable to focus first on Avatica
> > > 1.26.0, and afterwards releasing Calcite 1.39.0 (which shall include an
> > > upgrade to said Avatica version).
> > >
> > > BTW, according to previous threads [1], the next release managers should
> > be:
> > > - 1.39.0 Stamatis Zampetakis
> > > - 1.40.0 Hongyu Guo
> > > - 1.41.0 Jing Zhang
> > >
> > > @Stamatis, are you still available to be the next release manager for
> > > 1.39.0?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Ruben
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tw1rlv5yznlmqtt2chgfwy04f0wxtbhm
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:55 PM Francis Chuang <francischuang@apache.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Let's try and get Avatica out first as it's been more than 8 months
> > > > since the last release and I think we are very close with getting most
> > > > of the PRs in. Another benefit is that Calcite can upgrade to the
> > latest
> > > > version of Avatica for release 1.39.0
> > > >
> > > > On 14/01/2025 4:58 am, Mihai Budiu wrote:
> > > > > Personally I hope we can merge
> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4139
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Stamatis Zampetakis <za...@apache.org>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 4:35 AM
> > > > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org <de...@calcite.apache.org>
> > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.39.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > It's been almost three months since our last release (15 Oct 2024)
> > and
> > > > > there are about 135 new commits in main. I think it is a good time to
> > > > > start the discussion for 1.39.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > From the existing tickets tagged for 1.39.0 [1], I don't see release
> > > > > blockers. Are there any other must have items that we want to include
> > > > > in the release?
> > > > >
> > > > > There is a parallel thread about an Avatica release so I guess one of
> > > > > the main questions is how we should proceed in terms of timing. Do we
> > > > > want to focus on Avatica first or advance both in parallel?
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Stamatis
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >