You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@mesos.apache.org by "Yan Xu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/08/10 21:07:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-1719) Master should persist active
frameworks information
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16122328#comment-16122328 ]
Yan Xu commented on MESOS-1719:
-------------------------------
[~adam-mesos] does this being labelled {{mesosphere}} mean this is on your roadmap in the near to medium term?
> Master should persist active frameworks information
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-1719
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1719
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: master
> Reporter: Vinod Kone
> Assignee: Yongqiao Wang
> Labels: mesosphere, reliability
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1219 disallows completed frameworks from re-registering with the same framework id, as long as the master doesn't failover.
> This ticket tracks the work for it work across the master failover using registrar.
> There are some open questions that need to be addressed:
> --> Should registry contain framework ids only framework infos.
> For disallowing completed frameworks from re-registering, persisting
> framework ids is enough. But, if in the future, we want to disallow
> frameworks from re-registering if some parts of framework info
> changed then we need to persist the info too.
> --> How to update the framework info.
> Currently frameworks are allowed to update framework info while re-
> registering, but it only takes effect on the master when the master fails
> over and on the slave when the slave fails over. How should things
> change when persist framework info?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)