You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "Michi Mutsuzaki (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/03/10 08:22:38 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2136) Sync() should get quorum acks.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14354457#comment-14354457 ] 

Michi Mutsuzaki commented on ZOOKEEPER-2136:
--------------------------------------------

Thank you for working on this Hongchao. Do you think you can add a test case for this change?

> Sync() should get quorum acks.
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2136
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2136
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Hongchao Deng
>            Assignee: Hongchao Deng
>             Fix For: 3.6.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2000.patch
>
>
> Currently if the sync packet goes to leader it doesn't get quorum acks. This is a problem during reconfig and leader changes. testPortChange() flaky failure is caused by such case.
> I proposed to change sync() semantics to require quorum acks in any case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)