You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/06/04 06:45:00 UTC

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-527) Break dependency cycle between camel and camel.impl

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43210#action_43210 ] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-527:
-----------------------------------

I am currently working on the ProducerTemplate patch, testing it before comitting it.

I have marked the old CamelTemplate as @deprecated and hinted to use ProducerTemplate instead that can be fetch using the CamelContext.

> Break dependency cycle between camel and camel.impl
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-527
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-527
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>            Assignee: Hadrian Zbarcea
>             Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>         Attachments: producertemplate.patch, servicehelper.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 3 hours
>  Remaining Estimate: 3 hours
>
> Currently there is a dependency cycle between camel and camel.impl. While I think there is no problem when impl uses camel the other direction should not occur. Luckily there ist only one case where this happens. The class CamelTemplate from camel uses ServiceSupport from impl. 
> As a solution I would suggest to move ServiceSupport and Service to util. ServiceHelper is already in util and Service as well as ServiceSupport do not need any other classes. This would help to break the dependency cycle and at the same time move some classes out of the already quite big camel package.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.