You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@usergrid.apache.org by lewis john mcgibbney <le...@apache.org> on 2016/01/27 00:36:07 UTC
Confused Roadmap!
Hi dev@,
I am puzzled as to what the Roadmap looks like for Usergrid
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
It seems literally all over the place, with issues being addressed and
resolved for branches which are not even available in Git!
Can anyone shine some light on to what new issues should be resolved
against?
Thanks
Lewis
Re: Confused Roadmap!
Posted by Jeff West <jw...@apigee.com>.
2.0.x never made it to a release and should not be released
2.1.0 is what we are bug fixing in, preparing for release
2.1.1 is what we are working on in master
2.1.2 is for future planning
1.0.3 is also for future on the 1.x line, but we will likely not do this release in favor of all work being on >=2.1.x. If there are major issues with 1.x we would cut a 1.0.3 release.
We need to publish an updated development flow. We will be:
- actively developing in master
- when we approach a release we will merge master into release
- as we do release testing we will put bug fixes in release
- once we cut an Apache release we will branch and have a release version as the name. We will also merge release back into master at this time.
This will make it easier and cleaner.
Also, versions were rarely used in JIRA in the past and half the tickets are duplicated in more than one JIRA project outside Apache. It was not well maintained or groomed.
We hope to change this in the future and be more diligent.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff West | Engineering | apigee <http://apigee.com/> | m: +1.214.450.9378 | twitter <https://twitter.com/jeffreyawest>@ <http://twitter.com/USERNAME>j <http://twitter.com/USERNAME>effreyawest @apigee <https://twitter.com/apigee> | Skype jeffrey.a.west
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:36 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <le...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi dev@,
> I am puzzled as to what the Roadmap looks like for Usergrid
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
>
> It seems literally all over the place, with issues being addressed and
> resolved for branches which are not even available in Git!
>
> Can anyone shine some light on to what new issues should be resolved
> against?
> Thanks
> Lewis
Re: Confused Roadmap!
Posted by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the explanation. I've added the descriptions to the relevant
branch administration in Jira.
The Usergrid Dev team was using the Apache Jira instance very well
throughout incubation and in to graduation, that's why I was surprised to
see so many branches with issues addressed in them all and no real sense of
direction.
On a different note, I understand that you guys are developing heavily on
2.X, however I suggest it would be a good idea to sort out Jira and define
a release for 1.X.
Right now Jira shows
1. that 16/17 issues for 1.0.2 have been resolved. Further that 1.0.2
has not been released... which in reality it has.
2. That 5/8 issues have been resolved for 1.0.3 and that this has not
been released... which is true.
What is to be done with the above?
In addition I went ahead and archived the 2.0.0 version in Jira. This will
no longer show as being available for assigning issues to.
Once 1 and 2 above are resolved then it will be clear that new issues
involving 2.X should be assigned to 2.1.0 or 2.1.1. Is this correct?
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:36 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <le...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi dev@,
> I am puzzled as to what the Roadmap looks like for Usergrid
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
>
> It seems literally all over the place, with issues being addressed and
> resolved for branches which are not even available in Git!
>
> Can anyone shine some light on to what new issues should be resolved
> against?
> Thanks
> Lewis
>
--
*Lewis*