You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Henri Biestro (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/06/07 13:15:06 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (JEXL-250) Safe navigation operator

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Henri Biestro closed JEXL-250.
------------------------------

> Safe navigation operator
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: JEXL-250
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-250
>             Project: Commons JEXL
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 3.1
>            Reporter: Dmitri Blinov
>            Assignee: Henri Biestro
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.2
>
>
> It would be more convenient for a script writer to have a kind of safe navigation operator, in the form of, for example, ({{object?.property),}} for null pointer dereferences. I think its quite a common feature of many scripting (and compiled languages) now. The safe operator should work like basic navigation operator for non null values and should short-circuit the entire expression evaluation after encountering null value.
> I see the difference of new operator from the existing lenient mode evaluation in ability to explicitly define places in an expression where {{null}} deference is allowed, for example the expression {code}Order.Customer?.Name{code} defines that each {{Order}} should have a {{Customer}} and only the {{Name}} of the {{Customer}} is optional.
> The difference of new operator from the existing null coalescing {{??}} operator is in its ability to short-circuit evaluation.
> So, safe navigation operator would be a helpful syntaxic sugar which in my opinion does not overlap with an existing functionality.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)