You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com> on 2013/11/26 15:57:45 UTC
1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name
Hi,
i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception.
My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow it's
there in the debugger.
Any idea?
I must still use 1.1.5 :/
Regards,
Thomas
Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a
bean name
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
hi thomas,
please create a jira-ticket.
regards,
gerhard
2013/11/28 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
> Hi Gerhard,
>
> i added a unit test.
> It only occurs on multiple specialization -> BeanA -> @Specialized BeanB ->
> @Specialized BeanC.
> Can i check in and create a issue for it?
>
> It would be great if anyone of you could check it.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
>
>
> 2013/11/28 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>
>
> > hi thomas,
> >
> > i did a quick-check and don't see the same effect.
> > it would be great, if you provide a small demo which illustrates the
> issue.
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/28 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Guys, i really need your help!
> > > It was introduced in one of the ~300 commits for #344
> > > The most revisions event don't compile so i can't find the breaking
> > commit!
> > >
> > > How is it possible that my Bean does not have a @Named in the source
> code
> > > but it's really there in the debugger?
> > > Can ASM manipulate this without inheritance? I never looked deeper in
> > that
> > > byte code generation/manipulation stuff.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/11/26 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception.
> > > > My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow
> > it's
> > > > there in the debugger.
> > > >
> > > > Any idea?
> > > >
> > > > I must still use 1.1.5 :/
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a
bean name
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Hey Mark,
i also posted it in the ticket:
webbeans-impl\src\test\java\org\apache\webbeans\newtests\specalization\multiple
I just commented @Test, to not break the build.
Regards,
Thomas
2013/11/28 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> what is the name of the unit test? Or to which JIRA did you attach it?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
> >To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2013, 13:04
> >Subject: Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare
> a bean name
> >
> >
> >Hi Gerhard,
> >
> >i added a unit test.
> >It only occurs on multiple specialization -> BeanA -> @Specialized BeanB
> ->
> >@Specialized BeanC.
> >Can i check in and create a issue for it?
> >
> >It would be great if anyone of you could check it.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >2013/11/28 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> hi thomas,
> >>
> >> i did a quick-check and don't see the same effect.
> >> it would be great, if you provide a small demo which illustrates the
> issue.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> gerhard
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/11/28 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> > Guys, i really need your help!
> >> > It was introduced in one of the ~300 commits for #344
> >> > The most revisions event don't compile so i can't find the breaking
> >> commit!
> >> >
> >> > How is it possible that my Bean does not have a @Named in the source
> code
> >> > but it's really there in the debugger?
> >> > Can ASM manipulate this without inheritance? I never looked deeper in
> >> that
> >> > byte code generation/manipulation stuff.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2013/11/26 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception.
> >> > > My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow
> >> it's
> >> > > there in the debugger.
> >> > >
> >> > > Any idea?
> >> > >
> >> > > I must still use 1.1.5 :/
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Thomas
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
what is the name of the unit test? Or to which JIRA did you attach it?
LieGrue,
strub
>________________________________
> From: Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
>To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2013, 13:04
>Subject: Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a bean name
>
>
>Hi Gerhard,
>
>i added a unit test.
>It only occurs on multiple specialization -> BeanA -> @Specialized BeanB ->
>@Specialized BeanC.
>Can i check in and create a issue for it?
>
>It would be great if anyone of you could check it.
>
>Regards,
>Thomas
>
>
>
>
>2013/11/28 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>
>
>> hi thomas,
>>
>> i did a quick-check and don't see the same effect.
>> it would be great, if you provide a small demo which illustrates the issue.
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/28 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > Guys, i really need your help!
>> > It was introduced in one of the ~300 commits for #344
>> > The most revisions event don't compile so i can't find the breaking
>> commit!
>> >
>> > How is it possible that my Bean does not have a @Named in the source code
>> > but it's really there in the debugger?
>> > Can ASM manipulate this without inheritance? I never looked deeper in
>> that
>> > byte code generation/manipulation stuff.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/11/26 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception.
>> > > My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow
>> it's
>> > > there in the debugger.
>> > >
>> > > Any idea?
>> > >
>> > > I must still use 1.1.5 :/
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Thomas
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a
bean name
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Hi Gerhard,
i added a unit test.
It only occurs on multiple specialization -> BeanA -> @Specialized BeanB ->
@Specialized BeanC.
Can i check in and create a issue for it?
It would be great if anyone of you could check it.
Regards,
Thomas
2013/11/28 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>
> hi thomas,
>
> i did a quick-check and don't see the same effect.
> it would be great, if you provide a small demo which illustrates the issue.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2013/11/28 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
>
> > Guys, i really need your help!
> > It was introduced in one of the ~300 commits for #344
> > The most revisions event don't compile so i can't find the breaking
> commit!
> >
> > How is it possible that my Bean does not have a @Named in the source code
> > but it's really there in the debugger?
> > Can ASM manipulate this without inheritance? I never looked deeper in
> that
> > byte code generation/manipulation stuff.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/26 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception.
> > > My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow
> it's
> > > there in the debugger.
> > >
> > > Any idea?
> > >
> > > I must still use 1.1.5 :/
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Thomas
> > >
> >
>
Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a
bean name
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
hi thomas,
i did a quick-check and don't see the same effect.
it would be great, if you provide a small demo which illustrates the issue.
regards,
gerhard
2013/11/28 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
> Guys, i really need your help!
> It was introduced in one of the ~300 commits for #344
> The most revisions event don't compile so i can't find the breaking commit!
>
> How is it possible that my Bean does not have a @Named in the source code
> but it's really there in the debugger?
> Can ASM manipulate this without inheritance? I never looked deeper in that
> byte code generation/manipulation stuff.
>
>
>
> 2013/11/26 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception.
> > My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow it's
> > there in the debugger.
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> > I must still use 1.1.5 :/
> >
> > Regards,
> > Thomas
> >
>
Re: 1.2.1 - @Specialized Class : XXX may not explicitly declare a
bean name
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Guys, i really need your help!
It was introduced in one of the ~300 commits for #344
The most revisions event don't compile so i can't find the breaking commit!
How is it possible that my Bean does not have a @Named in the source code
but it's really there in the debugger?
Can ASM manipulate this without inheritance? I never looked deeper in that
byte code generation/manipulation stuff.
2013/11/26 Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> i just upgraded to 1.2.1 and i get this exception.
> My @Specialized class does not have a @Named annotation but somehow it's
> there in the debugger.
>
> Any idea?
>
> I must still use 1.1.5 :/
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>