You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Guanghao Zhang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/11 13:50:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21705) Should treat meta table specially for some methods in AsyncAdmin

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16740390#comment-16740390 ] 

Guanghao Zhang commented on HBASE-21705:
----------------------------------------

There is a check for META Table in AsyncMetaTableAccessor#tableExists

> Should treat meta table specially for some methods in AsyncAdmin
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-21705
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21705
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Admin, asyncclient, Client
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.2.0, 2.1.3, 2.0.5
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-21705.patch
>
>
> For example, tableExists, isTableEnabled, isTableDisabled...
> For now, we will go to the meta table directly but obviously, meta table does not contain the record for itself...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)