You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cocoon.apache.org by Bruno Dumon <br...@outerthought.org> on 2003/11/01 21:14:31 UTC
[WOODY] Form definition syntax change that affects all users
I've committed the previously discussed change of embedding child
widgets inside a wd:widgets element in the form definition. This is a
small change, but will require updating all existing form definitions.
So next time you update CVS, or update to the next release of Cocoon,
you'll need to update your form definitions.
Here's what practically needs to be done:
A form definition that previously looked like this:
<wd:form>
<wd:field .../>
<wd:field .../>
<wd:repeater .../>
</wd:form>
should now become:
<wd:form>
<wd:widgets>
<wd:field .../>
<wd:field .../>
<wd:repeater .../>
</wd:widgets>
</wd:form>
The same is true for the repeater widget:
<wd:repeater>
<wd:field .../>
<wd:field .../>
</wd:repeater>
becomes
<wd:repeater>
<wd:widgets>
<wd:field .../>
<wd:field .../>
<wd:widgets>
</wd:repeater>
The aggregatefield widget had already a container tag, but it was called
wd:children. It should now be renamed to wd:widgets.
--
Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
bruno@outerthought.org bruno@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
Re: [WOODY] Form definition syntax change that affects all users
Posted by Bruno Dumon <br...@outerthought.org>.
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 10:44, Marc Portier wrote:
> Bruno,
>
> Could we be missing the commits on both
> - RepeaterDefinitionBuilder and
> - AggregateDefinitionBuilder?
oops, should be ok now
>
> I did a recent checkout and checked over at
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/formmodel/
>
> regards,
> -marc=
>
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> <snip />
>
> > The same is true for the repeater widget:
> >
> > <wd:repeater>
> > <wd:field .../>
> > <wd:field .../>
> > </wd:repeater>
> >
> > becomes
> >
> > <wd:repeater>
> > <wd:widgets>
> > <wd:field .../>
> > <wd:field .../>
> > <wd:widgets>
> > </wd:repeater>
> >
> > The aggregatefield widget had already a container tag, but it was called
> > wd:children. It should now be renamed to wd:widgets.
> >
--
Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
bruno@outerthought.org bruno@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
Re: [WOODY] Form definition syntax change that affects all users
Posted by Bruno Dumon <br...@outerthought.org>.
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 10:44, Marc Portier wrote:
> Bruno,
>
> Could we be missing the commits on both
> - RepeaterDefinitionBuilder and
> - AggregateDefinitionBuilder?
oops, should be ok now
>
> I did a recent checkout and checked over at
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/formmodel/
>
> regards,
> -marc=
>
> Bruno Dumon wrote:
>
> <snip />
>
> > The same is true for the repeater widget:
> >
> > <wd:repeater>
> > <wd:field .../>
> > <wd:field .../>
> > </wd:repeater>
> >
> > becomes
> >
> > <wd:repeater>
> > <wd:widgets>
> > <wd:field .../>
> > <wd:field .../>
> > <wd:widgets>
> > </wd:repeater>
> >
> > The aggregatefield widget had already a container tag, but it was called
> > wd:children. It should now be renamed to wd:widgets.
> >
--
Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
bruno@outerthought.org bruno@apache.org
Re: [WOODY] Form definition syntax change that affects all users
Posted by Marc Portier <mp...@outerthought.org>.
Bruno,
Could we be missing the commits on both
- RepeaterDefinitionBuilder and
- AggregateDefinitionBuilder?
I did a recent checkout and checked over at
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/formmodel/
regards,
-marc=
Bruno Dumon wrote:
<snip />
> The same is true for the repeater widget:
>
> <wd:repeater>
> <wd:field .../>
> <wd:field .../>
> </wd:repeater>
>
> becomes
>
> <wd:repeater>
> <wd:widgets>
> <wd:field .../>
> <wd:field .../>
> <wd:widgets>
> </wd:repeater>
>
> The aggregatefield widget had already a container tag, but it was called
> wd:children. It should now be renamed to wd:widgets.
>
--
Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0116284/
mpo@outerthought.org mpo@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
Re: [WOODY] Form definition syntax change that affects all users
Posted by Marc Portier <mp...@outerthought.org>.
Bruno,
Could we be missing the commits on both
- RepeaterDefinitionBuilder and
- AggregateDefinitionBuilder?
I did a recent checkout and checked over at
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/formmodel/
regards,
-marc=
Bruno Dumon wrote:
<snip />
> The same is true for the repeater widget:
>
> <wd:repeater>
> <wd:field .../>
> <wd:field .../>
> </wd:repeater>
>
> becomes
>
> <wd:repeater>
> <wd:widgets>
> <wd:field .../>
> <wd:field .../>
> <wd:widgets>
> </wd:repeater>
>
> The aggregatefield widget had already a container tag, but it was called
> wd:children. It should now be renamed to wd:widgets.
>
--
Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0116284/
mpo@outerthought.org mpo@apache.org