You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com> on 2008/03/14 16:16:14 UTC

Cute name for Sling Client Library: Catapult (Re: [jira] Commented: (SLING-326) Rename µjax to "sling client library")

Hi all,

Once upon a time Carsten proposed "Catapult" when we were looking for a
name - it escapes my memory, what exactly it was ;-)

Now we are more closely integrating µjax into Sling as the Sling Client
Library. And of course, the famous "Catapult" is put back in action.

I would like to take this up and put it for discussion, that we
code-name the Sling Client Library as "Catapult".

Internally, we would still use sling: as prefix. But we might name the
client side java script file catapult.js...

WDYT ?

Regards
Felix


Re: Cute name for Sling Client Library: Catapult (Re: [jira] Commented: (SLING-326) Rename µjax to "sling client library")

Posted by Peter Svensson <ps...@gmail.com>.
+1

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Felix Meschberger wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Once upon a time Carsten proposed "Catapult" when we were looking for a
> > name - it escapes my memory, what exactly it was ;-)
> >
> > Now we are more closely integrating µjax into Sling as the Sling Client
> > Library. And of course, the famous "Catapult" is put back in action.
> >
> > I would like to take this up and put it for discussion, that we
> > code-name the Sling Client Library as "Catapult".
> >
> > Internally, we would still use sling: as prefix. But we might name the
> > client side java script file catapult.js...
> >
> > WDYT ?
> >
> Juppy, yes, yes, yes, please :)
>
> Big +1
>
> Carsten
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziegeler@apache.org
>

Re: Cute name for Sling Client Library: Catapult (Re: [jira] Commented: (SLING-326) Rename µjax to "sling client library")

Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Once upon a time Carsten proposed "Catapult" when we were looking for a
> name - it escapes my memory, what exactly it was ;-)
> 
> Now we are more closely integrating µjax into Sling as the Sling Client
> Library. And of course, the famous "Catapult" is put back in action.
> 
> I would like to take this up and put it for discussion, that we
> code-name the Sling Client Library as "Catapult".
> 
> Internally, we would still use sling: as prefix. But we might name the
> client side java script file catapult.js...
> 
> WDYT ?
> 
Juppy, yes, yes, yes, please :)

Big +1

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org