[jira] Commented: (AVRO-703) socket transport for Python

["Doug Cutting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966282#action_12966282 ] 

Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-703:
-----------------------------------

Looks good.  Is performance appreciably better than over HTTP?  I'd expect we might see a significant difference with one-way messages.

To test this we might:
 . extend Python's tool.py to use socket client & server when uri is "avro:"
 . extend Java's RpcSendTool and RpcReceiveTool to use sockets for "avro:" uris
 . change share/test/interop/bin/test_rpc_interop.sh to test using these "avro:" uris


> socket transport for Python
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-703
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703
>             Project: Avro
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: python
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.1
>            Reporter: Eric Evans
>            Assignee: Eric Evans
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 0001-python-socket-transceiver.patch
>
>
> Python users need a more performant alternative to HTTP transport. Patch to follow.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.