You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "stack (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/10/11 02:07:44 UTC

[jira] Commented: (HBASE-919) Master and Region Server should not use HTable

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12638689#action_12638689 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-919:
-----------------------------

This issue was uncovered because of way HMaster now refuses to let out the root location till all regions deployed?  HBASE-918?

Would there ever be functionality in HTable that is not in HConnectionManager regards retries or table-level manipulations that an HMaster or an HRS might exploit?


> Master and Region Server should not use HTable
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-919
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-919
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: master, regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 0.18.0
>            Reporter: Jim Kellerman
>            Assignee: Jim Kellerman
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.18.1, 0.19.0
>
>
> The master and region servers should NEVER use a HTable. HTable is only for client side use. During cluster startup, for example, there is not enough initialized for an HTable to work in either the master or a region server.
> The master and region server should therefore only use HConnectionManager and even there should only use very basic operations like getHRegionConnection.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.