You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Mesos Reviewbot <re...@mesos.apache.org> on 2019/07/17 14:18:11 UTC

Re: Review Request 71092: Added additional synchronization to a previously flaky test.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/71092/#review216690
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [71092]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' CONFIGURATION='--verbose --disable-libtool-wrappers --disable-parallel-test-execution' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker-build.sh

- Mesos Reviewbot


On July 17, 2019, 12:02 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/71092/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 17, 2019, 12:02 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benno Evers, Greg Mann, and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-9895
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9895
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This test did not make sure that the agent's task status update manager
> had received a task status update acknowledgemtn before launching a
> subsequent task. The agent then, given its state, correctly rejected the
> task.
> 
> This patch adds additional synchronization so the agent has finished
> processing the task status update like expected.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp 1ed59ca5af69a6b53ceb8be035e608286299c2f1 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/71092/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This test previously failed about 4% of the time in ~400 iterations (~20 failures) under a lot of additional system stress. With this patch it did not fail once in 500 iterations.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>