You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bob mcwhirter <bo...@werken.com> on 2003/09/04 02:38:24 UTC
Issue tracking (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20787] - Jelly project.xml specifies dependencies that are not in Ibiblio repository)
Someone should probalby shut down the jelly bugzilla, since
I believe folks are using Jira for all of the jellybugs...
-bob
On 4 Sep 2003 bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20787>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20787
>
> Jelly project.xml specifies dependencies that are not in Ibiblio repository
>
> proyal@apache.org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
> Resolution| |WONTFIX
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From proyal@apache.org 2003-09-04 00:39 -------
> no further information from reporter for 2 months. closing for now
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
--
Bob McWhirter bob@werken.com
The Werken Company http://werken.com/
Re: Issue tracking (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20787] - Jelly
project.xml specifies dependencies that are not in Ibiblio repository)
Posted by "Craig R. McClanahan" <cr...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Peter Royal wrote:
> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 20:55:50 -0400
> From: Peter Royal <pr...@apache.org>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <co...@jakarta.apache.org>
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <co...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Issue tracking (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20787] -
> Jelly project.xml specifies dependencies that are not in Ibiblio
> repository)
>
> On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 08:38 PM, bob mcwhirter wrote:
> > Someone should probalby shut down the jelly bugzilla, since
> > I believe folks are using Jira for all of the jellybugs...
>
> yup, i'm just trying to clear out the issues (2 maybe 3 left).. most
> people are good about using JIRA :)
>
> thing is, how to go about closing it?
I've got admin rights on Bugzilla ... just give me a holler when you've
got everything cleaned out and I'll delete that category. You'll lose the
bugs themselves as well, but it doesn't sound like you're using Bugzilla
for that anyway.
> -pete
Craig
Re: Issue tracking (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20787] - Jelly
project.xml specifies dependencies that are not in Ibiblio repository)
Posted by di...@multitask.com.au.
Ask infrastructure@ I believe.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Peter Royal <pr...@apache.org> wrote on 04/09/2003 10:55:50 AM:
> On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 08:38 PM, bob mcwhirter wrote:
> > Someone should probalby shut down the jelly bugzilla, since
> > I believe folks are using Jira for all of the jellybugs...
>
> yup, i'm just trying to clear out the issues (2 maybe 3 left).. most
> people are good about using JIRA :)
>
> thing is, how to go about closing it?
> -pete
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
Re: Issue tracking (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20787] - Jelly project.xml specifies dependencies that are not in Ibiblio repository)
Posted by Peter Royal <pr...@apache.org>.
On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 08:38 PM, bob mcwhirter wrote:
> Someone should probalby shut down the jelly bugzilla, since
> I believe folks are using Jira for all of the jellybugs...
yup, i'm just trying to clear out the issues (2 maybe 3 left).. most
people are good about using JIRA :)
thing is, how to go about closing it?
-pete