[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11393) Replication TableCfs should be a PB object rather than a string

["Heng Chen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14977900#comment-14977900 ] 

Heng Chen commented on HBASE-11393:
-----------------------------------

For backward compatibility, should we add a new interface something like 
{code}
void addPeer(String peerId, ReplicationPeerConfig peerConfig, TableCfsProto.TableCfs tableCFs)
      throws ReplicationException;
{code}

Or we just modify the original interface?



> Replication TableCfs should be a PB object rather than a string
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11393
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11393
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> We concatenate the list of tables and column families in format  "table1:cf1,cf2;table2:cfA,cfB" in zookeeper for table-cf to replication peer mapping. 
> This results in ugly parsing code. We should do this a PB object. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)