You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Jason Rutherglen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/08/12 00:00:15 UTC
[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1577) Benchmark of different in RAM
realtime techniques
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12742084#action_12742084 ]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1577:
------------------------------------------
We need a benchmark that simply measures the indexing of
1,5,10,100,1000 docs + (reopen + query). The first benchmark can
use IW.getReader as is (meaning the newly created segments are
written to disk), the other LUCENE-1313 (which stores newly
created segments in RAM). This way we can accurately say which
method works best and in what situation. The use case
LUCENE-1313 is designed for is sub 100 document updates.
I'll update LUCENE-1313, and give this a try.
> Benchmark of different in RAM realtime techniques
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1577
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1577
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/*
> Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1577.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> A place to post code that benchmarks the differences in the speed of indexing and searching using different realtime techniques.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org