You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@whirr.apache.org by Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> on 2010/10/27 19:32:41 UTC
Time for a 0.2.0 release of Whirr?
Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues
fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to
fix before 0.2.0
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91
In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue
(107) seems worthy of a new release.
I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. :-)
Patrick
Re: Time for a 0.2.0 release of Whirr?
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com>.
I've committed a fix for the final blocker JIRA (WHIRR-91) against
whirr 0.2.0. I'll work on creating a release candidate.
Patrick
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Tom White <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Feel free to take a look at it.
>
> Thanks!
> Tom
>
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> Tom were you still planning to do 91? If not lmk and I'll take a stab
>> at it. I'd like to get an RC built asap.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>> Do you think WHIRR-116 is a blocker too?
>>>
>>> I don't think so given the docs are available in the releases
>>> themselves. Would be nice to have at some point though.
>>>
>>> I do notice that it's
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/whirr/quick-start-guide.html
>>> rather than say whirr/docs/current/... which would facilitate having
>>> multiple versions under docs with current being a symbolic link to the
>>> most recent stable release docs. I'll update the jira.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would be nice to fix all four, but I agree that only WHIRR-91 is a blocker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues
>>>>>>> fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to
>>>>>>> fix before 0.2.0
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue
>>>>>>> (107) seems worthy of a new release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Time for a 0.2.0 release of Whirr?
Posted by Tom White <to...@gmail.com>.
Feel free to take a look at it.
Thanks!
Tom
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Tom were you still planning to do 91? If not lmk and I'll take a stab
> at it. I'd like to get an RC built asap.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> Do you think WHIRR-116 is a blocker too?
>>
>> I don't think so given the docs are available in the releases
>> themselves. Would be nice to have at some point though.
>>
>> I do notice that it's
>> http://incubator.apache.org/whirr/quick-start-guide.html
>> rather than say whirr/docs/current/... which would facilitate having
>> multiple versions under docs with current being a symbolic link to the
>> most recent stable release docs. I'll update the jira.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager!
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be nice to fix all four, but I agree that only WHIRR-91 is a blocker.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues
>>>>>> fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to
>>>>>> fix before 0.2.0
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue
>>>>>> (107) seems worthy of a new release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Time for a 0.2.0 release of Whirr?
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com>.
Tom were you still planning to do 91? If not lmk and I'll take a stab
at it. I'd like to get an RC built asap.
Thanks,
Patrick
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> Do you think WHIRR-116 is a blocker too?
>
> I don't think so given the docs are available in the releases
> themselves. Would be nice to have at some point though.
>
> I do notice that it's
> http://incubator.apache.org/whirr/quick-start-guide.html
> rather than say whirr/docs/current/... which would facilitate having
> multiple versions under docs with current being a symbolic link to the
> most recent stable release docs. I'll update the jira.
>
> Patrick
>
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager!
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice to fix all four, but I agree that only WHIRR-91 is a blocker.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues
>>>>> fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to
>>>>> fix before 0.2.0
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91
>>>>>
>>>>> In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue
>>>>> (107) seems worthy of a new release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Time for a 0.2.0 release of Whirr?
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com>.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Do you think WHIRR-116 is a blocker too?
I don't think so given the docs are available in the releases
themselves. Would be nice to have at some point though.
I do notice that it's
http://incubator.apache.org/whirr/quick-start-guide.html
rather than say whirr/docs/current/... which would facilitate having
multiple versions under docs with current being a symbolic link to the
most recent stable release docs. I'll update the jira.
Patrick
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager!
>>>
>>> It would be nice to fix all four, but I agree that only WHIRR-91 is a blocker.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues
>>>> fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to
>>>> fix before 0.2.0
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91
>>>>
>>>> In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue
>>>> (107) seems worthy of a new release.
>>>>
>>>> I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Time for a 0.2.0 release of Whirr?
Posted by Tom White <to...@cloudera.com>.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Grt. I marked 91 as a blocker.
>
> 1) Tom can you put up a patch for 91?
Will do.
Do you think WHIRR-116 is a blocker too?
> 2) as soon as 91 gets committed I'll cut an RC. Is there a "how to
> release" document for this?
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WHIRR/How+To+Release
Tom
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager!
>>
>> It would be nice to fix all four, but I agree that only WHIRR-91 is a blocker.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tom
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues
>>> fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to
>>> fix before 0.2.0
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91
>>>
>>> In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue
>>> (107) seems worthy of a new release.
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. :-)
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>
>
Re: Time for a 0.2.0 release of Whirr?
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com>.
Grt. I marked 91 as a blocker.
1) Tom can you put up a patch for 91?
2) as soon as 91 gets committed I'll cut an RC. Is there a "how to
release" document for this?
Patrick
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager!
>
> It would be nice to fix all four, but I agree that only WHIRR-91 is a blocker.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues
>> fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to
>> fix before 0.2.0
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91
>>
>> In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue
>> (107) seems worthy of a new release.
>>
>> I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. :-)
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>
Re: Time for a 0.2.0 release of Whirr?
Posted by Tom White <to...@cloudera.com>.
+1
Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager!
It would be nice to fix all four, but I agree that only WHIRR-91 is a blocker.
Cheers,
Tom
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues
> fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to
> fix before 0.2.0
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91
>
> In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue
> (107) seems worthy of a new release.
>
> I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. :-)
>
> Patrick
>
Re: Time for a 0.2.0 release of Whirr?
Posted by Adrian Cole <ad...@jclouds.org>.
+1
This would be really helpful for you to aid in release management.
-Adrian
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks, do you think it's a good time for a 0.2.0 release? 21 issues
> fixed so far, 4 open. Only one of those seems like it would be good to
> fix before 0.2.0
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91
>
> In particular updating to the new jclouds and addressing the AMI issue
> (107) seems worthy of a new release.
>
> I'd be happy to serve as release manager if everyone else is too busy. :-)
>
> Patrick
>