You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> on 2006/08/13 03:19:10 UTC
Fwd: svn commit: r431079
Jeremy,
I haven't had time to look at this carefully but would it be better
to have InterfaceJavaIntrospector be an ImplementationProcessor since
the component type information for POJOs is compiled there?
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r431079
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
Thinking a little more, using the ImplementationProcessor mechanisms
seems like a better way to tackle this. One major advantage would be
that we could add metadata to the service contract based on data type
or annotations (e.g. adding metadata saying that a parameter should
be bound using SDO which could be detected through the marker
interface or an @SDO annotation).
I have a head full of WSDL stuff atm so I'll open a JIRA so we don't
forget.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> Perhaps - this just seemed real simple.
> --
> Jeremy
>
> On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:19 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
>
>> Jeremy,
>>
>> I haven't had time to look at this carefully but would it be
>> better to have InterfaceJavaIntrospector be an
>> ImplementationProcessor since the component type information for
>> POJOs is compiled there?
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r431079
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
Perhaps - this just seemed real simple.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:19 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I haven't had time to look at this carefully but would it be better
> to have InterfaceJavaIntrospector be an ImplementationProcessor
> since the component type information for POJOs is compiled there?
>
> Jim
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org