You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Hari Kodungallur <hk...@spikesource.com> on 2005/03/17 05:40:10 UTC

activemq

Hello,

I just noticed that ActiveMQ moved from CVS to SVN. So I looked at
geronimo's latest maven.xml and ActiveMQ checkout has been removed. So,
I just wanted to know whether we just depend on the ActiveMQ jar file
instead of building ActiveMQ.

Thanks much!
-Hari

Re: activemq

Posted by David Jencks <dj...@gluecode.com>.

That is correct.

The combined build of geronimo, openejb, and tranql is actually a 
rather bad idea although IMO required by the current module structure.  
I've been hoping for several months that we could move to a more 
sensible comprehensive build system but it may still not happen for 
some time.

thanks
david jencks

On Mar 16, 2005, at 8:40 PM, Hari Kodungallur wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I just noticed that ActiveMQ moved from CVS to SVN. So I looked at
> geronimo's latest maven.xml and ActiveMQ checkout has been removed. So,
> I just wanted to know whether we just depend on the ActiveMQ jar file
> instead of building ActiveMQ.
>
> Thanks much!
> -Hari
>

Re: activemq

Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com>.

Yes...we will depend on the jar.

Jeff

Hari Kodungallur wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I just noticed that ActiveMQ moved from CVS to SVN. So I looked at
> geronimo's latest maven.xml and ActiveMQ checkout has been removed. So,
> I just wanted to know whether we just depend on the ActiveMQ jar file
> instead of building ActiveMQ.
> 
> Thanks much!
> -Hari