You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Ju...@davenport-industries.com.au on 2004/03/16 08:19:42 UTC

RE: * DAV SPAM ALERT * RE: SA 4 Win 's gotta be bugged bad!

Disregard this msg- I found the answer!


Regards,

Julian Milano
IT Manager


Davenport Group
79-81 Coppin Street (PO Box 12) Richmond Victoria 3121
Ph : (613) 8416 6666 

Limits of Liability and Disclaimer - Davenport Industries is not liable for
any loss, damages, claims, cost demand and expense whatsoever and howsoever
arising in connection with this email transmission. The receiver of this
transmission shall ascertain the accuracy and suitability of this data for
their purposes. Although computer virus scanning software is used by
Davenport Industries, the receiver shall be responsible for their own virus
protection and Davenport Industries shall not be held liable for and
subsequent loss, damage, cost or expense.

This email and any attachment is confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have
received this email in error you are prohibited from disclosing, copying or
using the information contained in it and please inform us by reply email
and delete.



-----Original Message-----
From: JulianM@davenport-industries.com.au
[mailto:JulianM@davenport-industries.com.au]
Sent: Monday, 15 March 2004 03:46 pm
To: spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: * DAV SPAM ALERT * RE: SA 4 Win 's gotta be bugged bad!


Spam detection software, running on the system
"davmail.davenport-industries.com.au", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
your mail administrator for details.

Content preview:  This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader
  does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be
  legible. What's worse now is this: I copied the HOT_NASTY rule to my
  custom ruleset file, and modified it as such: [...] 

Content analysis details:   (10.3 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
 0.5 ST_bw_horniest         BODY: ST - Body mentions horniest
 3.0 RM_bw_VIAGRA           BODY: mentions viagra
 1.9 VIAGRA                 BODY: Plugs Viagra
 0.2 EXCUSE_16              BODY: I wonder how many emails they sent in
error
 1.0 AM_BODY_PLING          BODY: Body has lots of exclamation points
 0.0 HOT_NASTY              BODY: Possible porn - Hot, Nasty, Wild, Young
 0.0 Julian01               BODY: Test for 'Julian'
 0.1 Met222                 BODY: /ADV/i
 0.0 PORN_16                BODY: Possible porn - nasty, dirty, little etc.
 0.1 Met2                   BODY: /single/i
 0.2 ADULT_SITE             BODY: Possible porn - Adult Web Sites
 0.8 HTML_30_40             BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE    BODY: HTML font color is blue
 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_GREEN   BODY: HTML font color is green
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG          BODY: HTML has a big font
 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE  BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette
 2.0 LOCAL_DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION LOCAL_DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.