You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geode.apache.org by Raymond Ingles <ri...@pivotal.io> on 2020/05/07 15:34:20 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Redis API Improvements
Just a quick nudge - we set a deadline for comments for tomorrow. Anyone
had a chance to look this over yet? Thanks!
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:09 PM Raymond Ingles <ri...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The current Redis API support in Geode has been marked experimental for a
> couple years and has several bugs and inconsistencies compared to native
> Redis. We created a RFC for updating the Geode Redis API support, to
> address issues in the implementation, improve performance and add High
> Availability support.
>
> Please review and comment by 5/8/2020.
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Redis+API+Improvements
>
> Thanks!
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Redis API Improvements
Posted by Darrel Schneider <ds...@pivotal.io>.
Experimental features are subject to change or removal. No guarantees are
made of backwards compatibility.
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:53 PM Donal Evans <do...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Looks good to me. Fixing broken implementation and providing reliable HA
> can only be a good thing. My only concern is the backwards compatibility
> issue, but I don't know if we make any guarantees regarding that for
> experimental features, so it may be a non-issue.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:35 AM Raymond Ingles <ri...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > Just a quick nudge - we set a deadline for comments for tomorrow. Anyone
> > had a chance to look this over yet? Thanks!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:09 PM Raymond Ingles <ri...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The current Redis API support in Geode has been marked experimental
> for a
> > > couple years and has several bugs and inconsistencies compared to
> native
> > > Redis. We created a RFC for updating the Geode Redis API support, to
> > > address issues in the implementation, improve performance and add High
> > > Availability support.
> > >
> > > Please review and comment by 5/8/2020.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Redis+API+Improvements
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Redis API Improvements
Posted by Donal Evans <do...@pivotal.io>.
Looks good to me. Fixing broken implementation and providing reliable HA
can only be a good thing. My only concern is the backwards compatibility
issue, but I don't know if we make any guarantees regarding that for
experimental features, so it may be a non-issue.
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:35 AM Raymond Ingles <ri...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Just a quick nudge - we set a deadline for comments for tomorrow. Anyone
> had a chance to look this over yet? Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:09 PM Raymond Ingles <ri...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The current Redis API support in Geode has been marked experimental for a
> > couple years and has several bugs and inconsistencies compared to native
> > Redis. We created a RFC for updating the Geode Redis API support, to
> > address issues in the implementation, improve performance and add High
> > Availability support.
> >
> > Please review and comment by 5/8/2020.
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Redis+API+Improvements
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>