You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> on 2002/11/10 07:48:51 UTC

RE: svn commit: rev 3709 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_wclibsvn_client

> From: Greg Hudson [mailto:ghudson@MIT.EDU]
> Sent: 10 November 2002 08:32

> On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 08:47, philip@tigris.org wrote:
> >   (temp_file_plain_cleanup_handler): Use parent pool.
> 
> Is that okay, if in actuality it is the parent pool (or its parent,
> etc.) being cleaned up?
> 
> (I could see the answer being yes or no, I just don't know which.  I'm
> surprised it's not okay to make allocations in the pool being cleaned,
> actually; it seems like it would be easy to make that possible. 
> Allowing the addition of new cleanup handlers during cleanup is a little
> more dicey, and could lead to infinite loops if misused, but it also
> seems eminently possible.)

Working on it.

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org