You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Chris Velevitch <ch...@gmail.com> on 2013/09/23 08:07:51 UTC
compatibilityVersionString
In the class FlexVersion, it has a property
called compatibilityVersionString. In Flex 4.6 the value is 4.6.0, in Flex
4.10 the value is 4.16.0. I would have thought the value should be 4.10.0.
This looks like a bug.
--
Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
m: 0415 469 095
www.apugs.org.au
Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
Topic: Building Everyday Web Apps as Cloud Apps by Geoff Bowers
Date: Monday, 30th Sep
Details and RSVP on http://www.meetup.com/Sydney-Adobe-Platform-User-Group
Re: compatibilityVersionString
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> In the class FlexVersion, it has a property
> called compatibilityVersionString. In Flex 4.6 the value is 4.6.0, in Flex
> 4.10 the value is 4.16.0. I would have thought the value should be 4.10.0.
> This looks like a bug.
It's a bug but probably has no effect. Nothing internally currently checks against VERSION_4_10 (which also have the same wrong value) or uses that method.
Thanks for finding it.
Justin
Re: compatibilityVersionString
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Please file a bug.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/22/13 11:11 PM, "Chris Velevitch" <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes, it is a bug because:-
>
> public static const VERSION_4_10:uint = 0x04100000
>
>should be:-
>
> public static const VERSION_4_10:uint = 0x040A0000
>
>And so should CURRENT_VERSION.
>
>
>On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Chris Velevitch
><ch...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> In the class FlexVersion, it has a property
>> called compatibilityVersionString. In Flex 4.6 the value is 4.6.0, in
>>Flex
>> 4.10 the value is 4.16.0. I would have thought the value should be
>>4.10.0.
>> This looks like a bug.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Chris
>> --
>> Chris Velevitch
>> Manager - Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
>> m: 0415 469 095
>> www.apugs.org.au
>>
>> Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
>> Topic: Building Everyday Web Apps as Cloud Apps by Geoff Bowers
>> Date: Monday, 30th Sep
>> Details and RSVP on
>>http://www.meetup.com/Sydney-Adobe-Platform-User-Group
>>
>
>
>
>--
>
>
>Chris
>--
>Chris Velevitch
>Manager - Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
>m: 0415 469 095
>www.apugs.org.au
>
>Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
>Topic: Building Everyday Web Apps as Cloud Apps by Geoff Bowers
>Date: Monday, 30th Sep
>Details and RSVP on http://www.meetup.com/Sydney-Adobe-Platform-User-Group
Re: compatibilityVersionString
Posted by Chris Velevitch <ch...@gmail.com>.
Yes, it is a bug because:-
public static const VERSION_4_10:uint = 0x04100000
should be:-
public static const VERSION_4_10:uint = 0x040A0000
And so should CURRENT_VERSION.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Chris Velevitch
<ch...@gmail.com>wrote:
> In the class FlexVersion, it has a property
> called compatibilityVersionString. In Flex 4.6 the value is 4.6.0, in Flex
> 4.10 the value is 4.16.0. I would have thought the value should be 4.10.0.
> This looks like a bug.
>
> --
>
>
> Chris
> --
> Chris Velevitch
> Manager - Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
> m: 0415 469 095
> www.apugs.org.au
>
> Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
> Topic: Building Everyday Web Apps as Cloud Apps by Geoff Bowers
> Date: Monday, 30th Sep
> Details and RSVP on http://www.meetup.com/Sydney-Adobe-Platform-User-Group
>
--
Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
m: 0415 469 095
www.apugs.org.au
Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
Topic: Building Everyday Web Apps as Cloud Apps by Geoff Bowers
Date: Monday, 30th Sep
Details and RSVP on http://www.meetup.com/Sydney-Adobe-Platform-User-Group
Re: compatibilityVersionString
Posted by Chris Velevitch <ch...@gmail.com>.
Log as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33771
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Justin,
>
> I'm about to shutdown for tonight, can you do a quick check to make sure
> no code in the modules folder needs to change as well? Just take a quick
> look at any changes to that folder between 4.9 and 4.10.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/22/13 11:26 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Fixed and checked into develop branch.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Justin
>
>
--
Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
m: 0415 469 095
www.apugs.org.au
Adobe Platform Users Group, Sydney
Topic: Building Everyday Web Apps as Cloud Apps by Geoff Bowers
Date: Monday, 30th Sep
Details and RSVP on http://www.meetup.com/Sydney-Adobe-Platform-User-Group
Re: compatibilityVersionString
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> I'm about to shutdown for tonight, can you do a quick check to make sure
> no code in the modules folder needs to change as well? Just take a quick
> look at any changes to that folder between 4.9 and 4.10.
I checked it's correct, from MxmlConfiguration.java:
public static final int VERSION_4_11 = 0x040b0000;
public static final int VERSION_4_10 = 0x040a0000;
public static final int LATEST_MAJOR_VERSION = 4;
public static final int LATEST_MINOR_VERSION = 11;
Thanks,
Justin
Re: compatibilityVersionString
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Justin,
I'm about to shutdown for tonight, can you do a quick check to make sure
no code in the modules folder needs to change as well? Just take a quick
look at any changes to that folder between 4.9 and 4.10.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/22/13 11:26 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Fixed and checked into develop branch.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
Re: compatibilityVersionString
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
Fixed and checked into develop branch.
Thanks,
Justin