You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by Michelle Caisse <Mi...@Sun.COM> on 2005/03/29 19:04:22 UTC
Re: TCK: object id class
Hi, Erik,
You must be using the repository from the wiki. Michael checked the JDO
1.1 files into the Apache subversion repository about a week ago and the
problem is fixed there. Please try it and let me know if you still have
any problems.
I think we didn't announce the check-in. My apologies. I am working on
getting the 2.0 project ready for check-in and I will send email when
that happens.
BTW, I moved this thread to the jdo-dev alias.
-- Michelle
erik@jpox.org wrote:
>The ID(String) constructors for the inner classes in the fieldtypes package are
>not correct too.
>
>Quoting erik@jpox.org:
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Some of the object id classes in the tck do not override toString and neither
>>provide a constructor with String argument or implement Serializable
>>interface.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: TCK: object id class
Posted by Craig Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Erik, Andy, David,
If you have not done so, please subscribe to this alias. The changes to
tck11 were announced on this alias and future changes to api20, tck20
will be announced as well.
Thanks,
Craig
On Mar 29, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Michelle Caisse wrote:
> Hi, Erik,
>
> You must be using the repository from the wiki. Michael checked the
> JDO 1.1 files into the Apache subversion repository about a week ago
> and the problem is fixed there. Please try it and let me know if you
> still have any problems.
>
> I think we didn't announce the check-in. My apologies. I am working
> on getting the 2.0 project ready for check-in and I will send email
> when that happens.
>
> BTW, I moved this thread to the jdo-dev alias.
>
> -- Michelle
>
> erik@jpox.org wrote:
>
>> The ID(String) constructors for the inner classes in the fieldtypes
>> package are
>> not correct too.
>>
>> Quoting erik@jpox.org:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Some of the object id classes in the tck do not override toString
>>> and neither
>>> provide a constructor with String argument or implement Serializable
>>> interface.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: TCK: object id class
Posted by Michelle Caisse <Mi...@Sun.COM>.
Yes, that's right. We discovered it building with jpox. -- Michelle
erik@jpox.org wrote:
>By the way, this is there since the JDOTCK 1.
>
>Erik Bengtson
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: erik@jpox.org [mailto:erik@jpox.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:07 PM
>To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>Subject: RE: TCK: object id class
>
>Michelle,
>
>I just got the latest version and the constructor taking String does not
>correspond to the toString
>
> public Oid(String s) { identifier = Integer.parseInt(s); }
>
> public String toString() { return this.getClass().getName() + ":
>" + identifier;}
>
>Regards,
>
>Erik Bengtson
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michelle Caisse [mailto:Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 7:04 PM
>To: erik@jpox.org
>Cc: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
>Subject: Re: TCK: object id class
>
>Hi, Erik,
>
>You must be using the repository from the wiki. Michael checked the JDO
>1.1 files into the Apache subversion repository about a week ago and the
>problem is fixed there. Please try it and let me know if you still have
>any problems.
>
>I think we didn't announce the check-in. My apologies. I am working on
>getting the 2.0 project ready for check-in and I will send email when
>that happens.
>
>BTW, I moved this thread to the jdo-dev alias.
>
>-- Michelle
>
>erik@jpox.org wrote:
>
>
>The ID(String) constructors for the inner classes in the fieldtypes
>package are
>not correct too.
>
>Quoting erik@jpox.org:
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Some of the object id classes in the tck do not override toString and
>neither
>provide a constructor with String argument or implement Serializable
>interface.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
RE: TCK: object id class
Posted by er...@jpox.org.
By the way, this is there since the JDOTCK 1.
Erik Bengtson
-----Original Message-----
From: erik@jpox.org [mailto:erik@jpox.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:07 PM
To: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: RE: TCK: object id class
Michelle,
I just got the latest version and the constructor taking String does not
correspond to the toString
public Oid(String s) { identifier = Integer.parseInt(s); }
public String toString() { return this.getClass().getName() + ":
" + identifier;}
Regards,
Erik Bengtson
-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle Caisse [mailto:Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 7:04 PM
To: erik@jpox.org
Cc: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: TCK: object id class
Hi, Erik,
You must be using the repository from the wiki. Michael checked the JDO
1.1 files into the Apache subversion repository about a week ago and the
problem is fixed there. Please try it and let me know if you still have
any problems.
I think we didn't announce the check-in. My apologies. I am working on
getting the 2.0 project ready for check-in and I will send email when
that happens.
BTW, I moved this thread to the jdo-dev alias.
-- Michelle
erik@jpox.org wrote:
The ID(String) constructors for the inner classes in the fieldtypes
package are
not correct too.
Quoting erik@jpox.org:
Hi,
Some of the object id classes in the tck do not override toString and
neither
provide a constructor with String argument or implement Serializable
interface.
RE: TCK: object id class
Posted by er...@jpox.org.
Michelle,
I just got the latest version and the constructor taking String does not
correspond to the toString
public Oid(String s) { identifier = Integer.parseInt(s); }
public String toString() { return this.getClass().getName() + ":
" + identifier;}
Regards,
Erik Bengtson
-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle Caisse [mailto:Michelle.Caisse@Sun.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 7:04 PM
To: erik@jpox.org
Cc: jdo-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: TCK: object id class
Hi, Erik,
You must be using the repository from the wiki. Michael checked the JDO
1.1 files into the Apache subversion repository about a week ago and the
problem is fixed there. Please try it and let me know if you still have
any problems.
I think we didn't announce the check-in. My apologies. I am working on
getting the 2.0 project ready for check-in and I will send email when
that happens.
BTW, I moved this thread to the jdo-dev alias.
-- Michelle
erik@jpox.org wrote:
The ID(String) constructors for the inner classes in the fieldtypes
package are
not correct too.
Quoting erik@jpox.org:
Hi,
Some of the object id classes in the tck do not override toString and
neither
provide a constructor with String argument or implement Serializable
interface.