You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> on 2011/05/31 23:06:46 UTC
Standalone Modules (Re: svn commit: r1129784)
On May 31, 2011, at 9:29 AM, genspring@apache.org wrote:
> 1, add a isStandalone field for modules. when the module is part of a ear, it's not standalone.
Since we already have an immutable "standaloneModule" boolean in AppModule. Maybe instead of adding second mutable boolean for the same thing, we could add a 'DeploymentModule parent' field and implement isStandaloneModule() of the child as:
public boolean isStandaloneModule() {
return parent.isStandaloneModule();
}
Thoughts?
-David
Re: Standalone Modules (Re: svn commit: r1129784)
Posted by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>.
Good suggestion, I added a patch to OPENEJB-1322. Could you take a look ?
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:06 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On May 31, 2011, at 9:29 AM, genspring@apache.org wrote:
>
> > 1, add a isStandalone field for modules. when the module is part of a
> ear, it's not standalone.
>
> Since we already have an immutable "standaloneModule" boolean in AppModule.
> Maybe instead of adding second mutable boolean for the same thing, we could
> add a 'DeploymentModule parent' field and implement isStandaloneModule() of
> the child as:
>
> public boolean isStandaloneModule() {
> return parent.isStandaloneModule();
> }
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> -David
>
>
--
Shawn