You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Richard Eckart de Castilho <ec...@ukp.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> on 2012/12/10 11:16:29 UTC
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] uimaFIT contribution to the UIMA sandbox
Hi,
it looks like we have submitted all the necessary documents:
1) a signed software grant from Technische Universität Darmstadt
2) a signed software grant from the University of Colorado
3) a signed license agreement from Fabio Mancinelli
I got direct confirmations that Craig (secretary@apache.org) received the documents for 1) and 3). I have been told by the University of Colorado that they also got a confirmation for 2).
To my knowledge, this resolves the contribution process, so that we can now officially attach the contribution ZIP to UIMA-2470, right?
I have also submitted an ICLA. As far as I know, Steven has also already submitted an ICLA as part of the cTakes incubation. Some time back I though that I had seen a web page listing the names of all people with signed ICLAs and all companies with signed CCLAs, but unfortunately I do not find it anymore.
Cheers,
-- Richard
Am 19.11.2012 um 17:41 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
> Hi Richard,
>
> What are the next steps here? Are you waiting on us, or on paperwork fixing?
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 10/26/2012 2:52 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>> The vote passes with 4 +1 votes and no other votes received.
>>
>> +1 Marshall Schor
>> +1 Tommaso Teofili
>> +1 Peter Klügl
>> +1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik
>>
>> Thanks for voting!
>>
>> I'll now fix the paperwork. Thank you for your support!
>>
>> -- Richard
>>
>>>>> Thank you for your comments to UIMA-2470.
>>>>>
>>>>> The comments raise no blockers towards the contribution of the staging
>>>>> package [1] as is, only several suggestions on changes that need to be made
>>>>> eventually as part of the contribution process. One vote was cast towards
>>>>> the contributing the staging packages as is and perform the suggested
>>>>> changes after the contribution. I also think that would be preferable to
>>>>> maintain a clear legacy trace.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I'm going to test my luck and call for a formal vote now.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm asking if you will please VOTE on bringing uimaFIT via the prepared
>>>>> staging package [1] into the Sandbox, after we get a software grant for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the contribution
>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the contribution (please explain why)
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Richard
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/UIMA-2470<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2470>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Eckart de Castilho
Technical Lead
Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing Lab (UKP-TUD)
FB 20 Computer Science Department
Technische Universität Darmstadt
Hochschulstr. 10, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
phone [+49] (0)6151 16-7477, fax -5455, room S2/02/B117
eckart@ukp.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de
Web Research at TU Darmstadt (WeRC) www.werc.tu-darmstadt.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] uimaFIT contribution to the UIMA sandbox
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 12/10/2012 5:16 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it looks like we have submitted all the necessary documents:
>
> 1) a signed software grant from Technische Universität Darmstadt
> 2) a signed software grant from the University of Colorado
> 3) a signed license agreement from Fabio Mancinelli
>
> I got direct confirmations that Craig (secretary@apache.org) received the documents for 1) and 3). I have been told by the University of Colorado that they also got a confirmation for 2).
>
> To my knowledge, this resolves the contribution process, so that we can now officially attach the contribution ZIP to UIMA-2470, right?
Yes.
>
> I have also submitted an ICLA. As far as I know, Steven has also already submitted an ICLA as part of the cTakes incubation. Some time back I though that I had seen a web page listing the names of all people with signed ICLAs and all companies with signed CCLAs, but unfortunately I do not find it anymore.
Here's how I find it. Start at incubator.apache.org - left nav - "Who We Are" -
bottom of that page has link to all committers - 3rd paragr has link to Persons
with Signed CLAs who are not yet committers.
-Marshall
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
> Am 19.11.2012 um 17:41 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> What are the next steps here? Are you waiting on us, or on paperwork fixing?
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 10/26/2012 2:52 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>> The vote passes with 4 +1 votes and no other votes received.
>>>
>>> +1 Marshall Schor
>>> +1 Tommaso Teofili
>>> +1 Peter Klügl
>>> +1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik
>>>
>>> Thanks for voting!
>>>
>>> I'll now fix the paperwork. Thank you for your support!
>>>
>>> -- Richard
>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for your comments to UIMA-2470.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The comments raise no blockers towards the contribution of the staging
>>>>>> package [1] as is, only several suggestions on changes that need to be made
>>>>>> eventually as part of the contribution process. One vote was cast towards
>>>>>> the contributing the staging packages as is and perform the suggested
>>>>>> changes after the contribution. I also think that would be preferable to
>>>>>> maintain a clear legacy trace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I'm going to test my luck and call for a formal vote now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm asking if you will please VOTE on bringing uimaFIT via the prepared
>>>>>> staging package [1] into the Sandbox, after we get a software grant for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the contribution
>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the contribution (please explain why)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/UIMA-2470<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2470>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] uimaFIT contribution to the UIMA sandbox
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I just checked in the ASF spot where they track received software grants, and
see the two (1) and (3) above, but nothing (yet) for (2).
So, let's wait till they appear there before adding this to our svn.
-Marshall
On 12/10/2012 5:16 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it looks like we have submitted all the necessary documents:
>
> 1) a signed software grant from Technische Universität Darmstadt
> 2) a signed software grant from the University of Colorado
> 3) a signed license agreement from Fabio Mancinelli
>
> I got direct confirmations that Craig (secretary@apache.org) received the documents for 1) and 3). I have been told by the University of Colorado that they also got a confirmation for 2).
>
> To my knowledge, this resolves the contribution process, so that we can now officially attach the contribution ZIP to UIMA-2470, right?
>
> I have also submitted an ICLA. As far as I know, Steven has also already submitted an ICLA as part of the cTakes incubation. Some time back I though that I had seen a web page listing the names of all people with signed ICLAs and all companies with signed CCLAs, but unfortunately I do not find it anymore.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
> Am 19.11.2012 um 17:41 schrieb Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> What are the next steps here? Are you waiting on us, or on paperwork fixing?
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 10/26/2012 2:52 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>> The vote passes with 4 +1 votes and no other votes received.
>>>
>>> +1 Marshall Schor
>>> +1 Tommaso Teofili
>>> +1 Peter Klügl
>>> +1 Jaroslaw Cwiklik
>>>
>>> Thanks for voting!
>>>
>>> I'll now fix the paperwork. Thank you for your support!
>>>
>>> -- Richard
>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for your comments to UIMA-2470.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The comments raise no blockers towards the contribution of the staging
>>>>>> package [1] as is, only several suggestions on changes that need to be made
>>>>>> eventually as part of the contribution process. One vote was cast towards
>>>>>> the contributing the staging packages as is and perform the suggested
>>>>>> changes after the contribution. I also think that would be preferable to
>>>>>> maintain a clear legacy trace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I'm going to test my luck and call for a formal vote now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm asking if you will please VOTE on bringing uimaFIT via the prepared
>>>>>> staging package [1] into the Sandbox, after we get a software grant for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the contribution
>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the contribution (please explain why)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/UIMA-2470<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2470>
>