You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to user@flume.apache.org by "Ryo.Hongo" <xx...@gmail.com> on 2013/02/19 04:21:03 UTC

It's better not to use thrift?

Hi.

I want to use thrift. but ThriftFlumeEvent class is deprecated...

It's better not to use thrift?

Please tell me better way.
ryo.

Re: It's better not to use thrift?

Posted by "Ryo.Hongo" <xx...@gmail.com>.

Hi, Mike.

I'll consider your advise!
Thank you!




2013/2/20 Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org>

> Hari has done recent work on a modern Thrift RPC implementation. The
> existing impl. is there for legacy purposes and does not have a batch
> append() call so it turns out to be quite slow.
>
> Have you considered using the HTTP source? With decent batch sizes and
> keep-alive the performance might be fine for your use case (depending on
> what your requirements are).
>
> Regards
> Mike
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Ryo.Hongo <xx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I want to use thrift. but ThriftFlumeEvent class is deprecated...
>>
>> It's better not to use thrift?
>>
>> Please tell me better way.
>> ryo.
>>
>
>

Re: It's better not to use thrift?

Posted by Mike Percy <mp...@apache.org>.

Hari has done recent work on a modern Thrift RPC implementation. The
existing impl. is there for legacy purposes and does not have a batch
append() call so it turns out to be quite slow.

Have you considered using the HTTP source? With decent batch sizes and
keep-alive the performance might be fine for your use case (depending on
what your requirements are).

Regards
Mike

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Ryo.Hongo <xx...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> I want to use thrift. but ThriftFlumeEvent class is deprecated...
>
> It's better not to use thrift?
>
> Please tell me better way.
> ryo.
>