You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> on 2008/12/26 17:47:51 UTC
[VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
Distribution:
* [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
Maven 2 staging repository:
* [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
list.
As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
to help do the work
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
Posted by Al Sutton <al...@funkyandroid.com>.
I've now his an exception in the ssl plugin which comes from Google
code. I'm going to have more time to debug this a bit more tomorrow, but
thanks for the pointers.
Al.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> add this to your struts.xml:
>
> <constant name="struts.codebehind.classSuffix" value="Controller"/>
> <constant name="struts.codebehind.action.checkImplementsAction" value="false"/>
> <constant name="struts.codebehind.action.checkAnnotation" value="false"/>
> <constant name="struts.codebehind.action.defaultMethodName" value="index"/>
> <constant name="struts.configuration.classpath.defaultParentPackage"
> value="rest-default" />
>
> does it work after that?
> musachy
>
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As Codebehind was deprecated REST should build on top of Convention,
>> you might want to start a new thread for this (maybe we broke
>> something in REST?).
>>
>> musachy
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Al Sutton <al...@funkyandroid.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've just dropped the 2.1.3 jars into an app which was working with 2.1.2
>>> and the rest URLs appear to no longer work.
>>>
>>> Previously / fired off Controller.index() in my actions package. Now I just
>>> get;
>>>
>>> "T here is no Action mapped for namespace / and action name . - [unknown
>>> location]"
>>>
>>> I've traced through to where RestActionProxyFactory calls through to
>>> DefaultActionProxy.prepare() on line 59, and it seems that the action name
>>> is apps whereas all of the keys inside DefaultActionPropxy,prepare are
>>> appsController, and hence a problem arises.
>>>
>>> I couldn't see any info about it in the version notes, is it something wierd
>>> I've done?
>>>
>>> Al.
>>>
>>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
>>>>
>>>> Release notes:
>>>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
>>>>
>>>> Distribution:
>>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
>>>>
>>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
>>>>
>>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>>> [ ] Alpha
>>>> [ ] Beta
>>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>>
>>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>>>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>>>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>>>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>>>> to help do the work
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> ======
>>> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the company
>>> number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House, 152-160 City
>>> Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK.
>>> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
>>> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
>>> subsidiaries.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
======
Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK.
The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
subsidiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
add this to your struts.xml:
<constant name="struts.codebehind.classSuffix" value="Controller"/>
<constant name="struts.codebehind.action.checkImplementsAction" value="false"/>
<constant name="struts.codebehind.action.checkAnnotation" value="false"/>
<constant name="struts.codebehind.action.defaultMethodName" value="index"/>
<constant name="struts.configuration.classpath.defaultParentPackage"
value="rest-default" />
does it work after that?
musachy
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As Codebehind was deprecated REST should build on top of Convention,
> you might want to start a new thread for this (maybe we broke
> something in REST?).
>
> musachy
>
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Al Sutton <al...@funkyandroid.com> wrote:
>> I've just dropped the 2.1.3 jars into an app which was working with 2.1.2
>> and the rest URLs appear to no longer work.
>>
>> Previously / fired off Controller.index() in my actions package. Now I just
>> get;
>>
>> "T here is no Action mapped for namespace / and action name . - [unknown
>> location]"
>>
>> I've traced through to where RestActionProxyFactory calls through to
>> DefaultActionProxy.prepare() on line 59, and it seems that the action name
>> is apps whereas all of the keys inside DefaultActionPropxy,prepare are
>> appsController, and hence a problem arises.
>>
>> I couldn't see any info about it in the version notes, is it something wierd
>> I've done?
>>
>> Al.
>>
>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>>
>>> The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
>>>
>>> Distribution:
>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
>>>
>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
>>>
>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>
>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>>> list.
>>>
>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>>> to help do the work
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ======
>> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the company
>> number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House, 152-160 City
>> Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK.
>> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
>> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
>> subsidiaries.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
As Codebehind was deprecated REST should build on top of Convention,
you might want to start a new thread for this (maybe we broke
something in REST?).
musachy
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Al Sutton <al...@funkyandroid.com> wrote:
> I've just dropped the 2.1.3 jars into an app which was working with 2.1.2
> and the rest URLs appear to no longer work.
>
> Previously / fired off Controller.index() in my actions package. Now I just
> get;
>
> "T here is no Action mapped for namespace / and action name . - [unknown
> location]"
>
> I've traced through to where RestActionProxyFactory calls through to
> DefaultActionProxy.prepare() on line 59, and it seems that the action name
> is apps whereas all of the keys inside DefaultActionPropxy,prepare are
> appsController, and hence a problem arises.
>
> I couldn't see any info about it in the version notes, is it something wierd
> I've done?
>
> Al.
>
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>
>> The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
>>
>> Release notes:
>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
>>
>> Distribution:
>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
>>
>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
>>
>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>> with a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>
>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>
>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>> list.
>>
>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>> to help do the work
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ======
> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the company
> number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House, 152-160 City
> Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK.
> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> subsidiaries.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
Posted by Al Sutton <al...@funkyandroid.com>.
I've just dropped the 2.1.3 jars into an app which was working with
2.1.2 and the rest URLs appear to no longer work.
Previously / fired off Controller.index() in my actions package. Now I
just get;
"T here is no Action mapped for namespace / and action name . - [unknown
location]"
I've traced through to where RestActionProxyFactory calls through to
DefaultActionProxy.prepare() on line 59, and it seems that the action
name is apps whereas all of the keys inside DefaultActionPropxy,prepare
are appsController, and hence a problem arises.
I couldn't see any info about it in the version notes, is it something
wierd I've done?
Al.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
======
Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK.
The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
subsidiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
+1 GA
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
Posted by Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com>.
Should be done, it might have bulk mailed on 29 issues though, sorry :(
-Wes
On Sat, 2008-12-27 at 12:45 -0500, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> yes, the good news is that rolling 2.1.4 won't be that painful. We
> need to move the jira tickets to 2.1.5 leaving the one for this
> problem, and the one I opened for REST.
>
> musachy
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:40 PM, James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com> wrote:
> > Fair enough. I agree. Does that mean we'll fix and roll a 2.1.4?
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I am downgrading my vote to:
> >>
> >> +1 Leave at test build
> >>
> >> See https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2937 for details.
> >> Thanks Al, for testing and reporting.
> >> musachy
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
> >> >
> >> > Release notes:
> >> > * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
> >> >
> >> > Distribution:
> >> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
> >> >
> >> > Maven 2 staging repository:
> >> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
> >> >
> >> > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> >> > with a vote on its quality:
> >> >
> >> > [ ] Leave at test build
> >> > [ ] Alpha
> >> > [ ] Beta
> >> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >> >
> >> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> >> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> >> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >> >
> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> >> > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> >> > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> >> > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> >> > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> >> > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> >> > list.
> >> >
> >> > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> >> > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> >> > to help do the work
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
yes, the good news is that rolling 2.1.4 won't be that painful. We
need to move the jira tickets to 2.1.5 leaving the one for this
problem, and the one I opened for REST.
musachy
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:40 PM, James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com> wrote:
> Fair enough. I agree. Does that mean we'll fix and roll a 2.1.4?
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am downgrading my vote to:
>>
>> +1 Leave at test build
>>
>> See https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2937 for details.
>> Thanks Al, for testing and reporting.
>> musachy
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
>> >
>> > Release notes:
>> > * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
>> >
>> > Distribution:
>> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
>> >
>> > Maven 2 staging repository:
>> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
>> >
>> > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>> > with a vote on its quality:
>> >
>> > [ ] Leave at test build
>> > [ ] Alpha
>> > [ ] Beta
>> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
>> >
>> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>> >
>> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>> > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>> > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>> > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>> > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>> > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>> > list.
>> >
>> > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>> > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>> > to help do the work
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
Posted by James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com>.
Fair enough. I agree. Does that mean we'll fix and roll a 2.1.4?
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am downgrading my vote to:
>
> +1 Leave at test build
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2937 for details.
> Thanks Al, for testing and reporting.
> musachy
>
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
> >
> > Release notes:
> > * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
> >
> > Distribution:
> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
> >
> > Maven 2 staging repository:
> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
> >
> > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> > with a vote on its quality:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >
> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> > list.
> >
> > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> > to help do the work
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
I am downgrading my vote to:
+1 Leave at test build
See https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2937 for details.
Thanks Al, for testing and reporting.
musachy
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.3 Quality
Posted by Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com>.
I d/l and tested the apps here -
http://code.google.com/p/struts2inpractice/
I've been working on a book (as some of you might know) and I have been
working off of trunk, so I updated my local poms and ran / tested
locally and they all worked. Of course, they don't use all of Struts2
functionality (yet, I'm only through chapter 4), but have been using 2.1
since the get-go and personally, I think it's ready for primetime.
+1 GA
-Wes
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 11:47 -0500, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.3 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-213.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.3/m2-staging-repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org