You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to taglibs-user@tomcat.apache.org by "Gideon, Thomas" <Th...@B2eMarkets.com> on 2002/10/15 22:39:09 UTC

Implicit PageContext argument for EL fucntions (was RE: Beefing u p JSTL EL in JSP 2)

+1

I think this is an excellent suggestion.

Thomas Gideon
Sr. Software Developer
B2eMarkets

301.230.2236  Tel.
301.230.2248  Fax.
thomas.gideon@B2eMarkets.com
www.B2eMarkets.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Lenz [mailto:cmlenz@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:21 PM
> To: Tag Libraries Users List
> Subject: Re: Beefing up JSTL EL in JSP 2
> 
> 
> On a somewhat related note, I've been wondering if the 
> EL-functions as 
> discussed here shouldn't have an implicit pageContext argument.
> 
> For instance, if the TLD specified a function like:
> 
>    <function>
>      <name>isUserInRole</name>
>      <function-class>mypkg.MyFunctions</function-class>
>      <function-signature>
>        boolean isUserInRole(PageContext, String)
>      </function-signature>
>    </function>
> 
> the page author could simply write:
> 
>    ${my:isUserInRole('editor')}
> 
> without needing to pass the pageContext object. The EL-engine 
> would take 
> care about that. I personally think the page author would expect a 
> EL-function to get informed about the page context automatically, and 
> that many useful functions would need access to it.
> 
> Anyway, I should probably send this to the JSP-group, just wanted to 
> hear if anyone else thinks it'd be a good idea... Thoughts?

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>